• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Jun 20, 2019
2,638
The precise reason why so many are opposed to rash military actions is because of the unintended series of events they can instigate. Every decision to escalate heightens the odds of tragedy, purposeful or otherwise. That is why I believe the U.S. shares the blame in this tragedy.
Agree completely with the first part of this post. I don't really the blame game brings much illumination here. The greater lesson, and it's a very old one, is that two opposed military states creating a state of heightened tension and fear in each other's spheres of control can lead to tragedy and death because you are then depending on the cool judgment and capabilities of untold numbers of soldiers, bureaucrats, and civilian functionaries to make all the right decisions to avoid catastrophe. One or two fuckups and this is what you get, or worse.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
No, that isn't the case. No matter how much "the militia is backed by them" is thrown.
Excuses me? Yes it is. Soleimani has personally ordered the deaths of countless Americans, Iraqis, Syrians, Iranians, and more.
Defending American militarism is defending mass murderers.
Who is defending American militarism?

No one in this conflict is a good guy, it's just different types of bad and the people that suffer because of it.
 

Hierophant

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,196
Sydney
Please stop defending mass murderers. Soleimani wasn't killed for being strong, he was killed because he killed Americans.
I don't see how an example of the systemic devaluing of human life by the Iranian government isn't relevant to a thread about their lack of adequate care for human life.
If you want to stop defending mass murderers, stop defending the entire US executive branch, past and present, who are all just as culpable and guilty in the murders of millions.
He's a mass murder of Americans. What other explanation are you looking for?
It's good to finally admit that you literally only care when it's an American life being taken though, how many brown people are equal to one American life?
 

KCS

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,438
Sucks to be the guy who was told that American bombers would be coming in any minute to fuck their shit up and shot down the first thing that entered military airspace. The person who first leaked the footage of the attack is fucked as well.
 

SasaBassa

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,059
This is clearly Iran's fault but it doesn't happen without extreme US idiocy by the dumb fuck in chief.

What an awful start to the year.
 

Hierophant

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,196
Sydney
Excuses me? Yes it is. Soleimani has personally ordered the deaths of countless Americans, Iraqis, Syrians, and Iranians.

Who is defending American militarism?

No one in this conflict is a good guy, it's just different types of bad and the people that suffer because of it.
Youre literally bringing up biblical characters in your reasons for the current geopolitical situation in Iran, this is in the level of George Bush bringing up Gog and Magog for some stupid clash of the civilisations shit
 

Suiko

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,931
Sucks to be the guy who was told that American bombers would be coming in any minute to fuck their shit up and shot down the first thing that entered military airspace. The person who first leaked the footage of the attack is fucked as well.

This is unsubstantiated bullshit.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
If you want to stop defending mass murderers, stop defending the entire US executive branch, past and present, who are all just as culpable and guilty in the murders of millions.

It's good to finally admit that you literally only care when it's an American life being taken though, how many brown people are equal to one American life?
The fuck? First of all where am I defending Trump, and secondly where did I say I only care about Americans? I said the US government acted because the death of Americans.

You do your argument no service by willfully misrepresenting others.

Youre literally bringing up biblical characters in your reasons for the current geopolitical situation in Iran, this is in the level of George Bush bringing up Gog and Magog for some stupid clash of the civilisations shit
That was obviously a fanatical example of how far back you can trace this conflict.
 

Serpens007

Well, Tosca isn't for everyone
Moderator
Oct 31, 2017
8,127
Chile
Excuses me? Yes it is. Soleimani has personally ordered the deaths of countless Americans, Iraqis, Syrians, Iranians, and more.

Cool, so I'll wait to see the heads of those that ordered US intervention in my country for the dead of thousands, sponsored by the US since they are the only ones who can do that.

Who is defending American militarism?

No one in this conflict is a good guy, it's just different types of bad and the people that suffer because of it.

That's
The
Point

Iran is to blame for this. But people has the right to feel that is also a consequence of US interventionism.
 

Hierophant

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,196
Sydney
The fuck? First of all where am I defending Trump, and secondly where did I say I only care about Americans? I said the US government acted because the death of Americans.

You do your argument no service by willfully misrepresenting others.
Placing the blame entirely on Iran in this scenario is a defense of Trumps horrid foreign policy actions in the region and the entire lead up to the events, willingly overlooking history in regards to current political actions is the height of American arrogance.
 

s0l0kill

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
856
Thank god they said the truth this time because the families of the victims are the ones left in the dust here, still find it mind-boggling as to why they even tried covering this up. I don't buy the US is at fault here, this was in the middle of an Iranian attack, not a US one, it should've been a priority for Iran to make sure things like that won't happen while they're attacking another country from their territory.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
Placing the blame entirely on Iran in this scenario is a defense of Trumps horrid foreign policy actions in the region and the entire lead up to the events, willingly overlooking history in regards to current political actions is the height of American arrogance.
The history of the region didn't shot down this plane.

Blame the US for all the shit they have done, but this historic and tragic fuckup is the result of a very basic breakdown in the Iranian military and civilian air traffic and defense system. Period.
 

Riddler

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,779
He's a mass murder of Americans. What other explanation are you looking for?

sorry but this argument can be applied to most nations higher up military personnel(commanding or any soldier with a weapon) so other countries should be assassinating other country military?
Just a high amount of "taking down the bad guy" Excuses all around the world?
 

Pekola

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,507
You do your argument no service by willfully misrepresenting others.

You've misinterpreted the argument of at least 5 or more posters by implying they're "stanning" Iran or that they're absolving Iran of blame in this situation.

It's been a tense situation recently, to be sure. It's okay to take a step back.
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,183
Understanding that in this context, the situation has US involvement at the heart of it =/= Absolving Iran.

It's not rocket science.
Yep.

Time (I know) actually had a good article about this the other day:

Despite all the high-tech wizardry of modern warfare, human nature makes war messy. Military analysts describe a "fog" that sets in over the battlefield, making it difficult to rationally make decisions or assess facts, often resulting in miscalculation that results in unforeseeable consequences.

"How can it happen? The crew talked themselves into things that simply were not true," said John "Fozzy" Miller, a retired Navy admiral and former commander for U.S. naval forces in the Persian Gulf, referring to the USS Vincennes incident. "It's not because they had the wrong intent. It's because they felt like they could be under attack… and you just begin to see things that really aren't there."

Miller, who's now an associate fellow for the International Institute for Strategic Studies, cited the post-accident investigation done by the Navy that pointed to a kind of "group psychosis" that gripped the ship's crew that was constantly scanning the skies for an Iranian attack. Even when using sophisticated anti-aircraft systems, like the Vincennes' then-state-of-the-art Aegis Weapons System, a scared crew "can override all of that sophisticated information, and see something as an enemy target," Miller said.

Fred Kagan, director of the Critical Threats Project at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute think tank, says it would be a "humiliation" if Iran proves to have shot down a commercial jet with dozens of its own citizens onboard.

"It badly undermines their image of professionalism and quality of the air defense force around Tehran, which you would have thought are the best and most reliable forces they have," he told TIME Thursday.
 

Cranster

Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,788
Both are at fault. Iran for shooting it down and Trump for escalating shit with Iran.
 

Serpens007

Well, Tosca isn't for everyone
Moderator
Oct 31, 2017
8,127
Chile
I don't see your point? Does this statement make Soleimani any less a monster? He's just a monster with company.

It would seem you only care about those that Soleimani killed, that's the point. The world has seen how much the US has fucked places, killed, allowed atrocities, destroyed societies, etc. we are tired of giving the US a pass. If your world is black and white, maybe this will sound "making Soleimani less a monster".
 

Magneton

Banned
Jul 31, 2018
244
The history of the region didn't shot down this plane.

Blame the US for all the shit they have done, but this historic and tragic fuckup is the result of a very basic breakdown in the Iranian military and civilian air traffic and defense system. Period.

Period? Why are you acting like your opinion on this is the final word? Many people in this thread obviously think the greater context is important, but you keep dismissing their viewpoints as "useless."
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
It would seem you only care about those that Soleimani killed, that's the point. The world has seen how much the US has fucked places, killed, allowed atrocities, destroyed societies, etc. we are tired of giving the US a pass. If your world is black and white, maybe this will sound "making Soleimani less a monster".
...Are you actually defending Soleimani?
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
They mean that if Americans love this bad guy accountability shit, they should start by looking at their own home base.
Who is saying otherwise?
Period? Why are you acting like your opinion on this is the final word? Many people in this thread obviously think the greater context is important, but you keep dismissing their viewpoints as "useless."
Why are you putting quotes around a word I never used?
 
Nov 1, 2017
3,067
Why because you don't agree with them? It's not like he's being a total ass. I don't know how you're able to function in the real world if his replies require and ignore.
Eh, what? It's not like he's saying anything malicious. That is exactly what happened.
When a demented megalomaniac is in control of one of the world's largest armies and threatens your country (and has already provoked by assassinating their top general!), it's easy to see how the mistake was made. The blame is equal. To say Iran is 100% at fault is ignorance to a level where I do not wish to interact with them any further.
 
Last edited:
Oct 27, 2017
12,238
Who is saying otherwise?
Uh huh, but accountability for non Americans seems to be drone strike to the face, yet every former President walks free. You're saying that the US acted (by bombing a sovereign country) to a threat, yet the US have people doing the exact same thing, directly or indirectly, yet no one is droning them.
 

Magneton

Banned
Jul 31, 2018
244
Because I think they are wrong, just like they think I am? Your question doesn't make much sense to me, can you explain?

That doesn't answer my question. I'm asking why YOU are using language that shuts down discussion and positions your answers as all that needs to be said about this subject.
 

Deleted member 3968

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
888
The ability of certain ppl to intentionally misread ppl's words and to twist themselves into pretzels to defend 1 countries atrocities while condemning the other's is frankly staggering.

I'm actually not sure if it's on purpose or not anymore.

It's ok to take a step back if you can't engage honestly with others and recollect yourself.