Reducing your eating window doesn't force you to not get the proper necessary nutrients when you do eat. In fact, that's what you should focus on eating when you do it.Is this healthy though? Not eating might be a good way of cutting calories, but what about your daily required vitamins/proteine etc.?
Is this healthy though? Not eating might be a good way of cutting calories, but what about your daily required vitamins/proteine etc.?
Reducing your eating window doesn't force you to not get the proper necessary nutrients when you do eat. In fact, that's what you should focus on eating when you do it.
You seem confused.
There's fasting fasting, which is where you abstain from food for a long time. There are medical guidelines for this sort of thing, but it's generally considered safe.
Then there's traditional intermittent fasting, where your diet doesn't change (unless you want it to) and you just eat all your food in a certain window of time. For instance, I eat between 7pm and midnight.
What do you mean with long term fast litterally no food?I'm doing a long term fast, tracking daily progress on my Instagram. My first fast I went from 202 to 174, now Im going to get the rest off and be ripped af. I still hit the gym daily too
https://www.instagram.com/fastlikeabear/
No food, 30 days. I've done two other 30 day fast, one being last March and another a few years ago.
No food, 30 days. I've done two other 30 day fast, one being last March and another a few years ago.
That's quite extensive, it's good that it's not a frequent thing. How do you approach solid food re-introduction?
30 day fasts are useless for nothing else but testing your own will.
Most people fast to help with losing weight/controlling hunger and locking in gains with their exercise regimes. Going more than, say a week or two, without eating you're just getting diminishing returns for your misery, for the purposes most people look into trying fasting for, and that's ignoring all the mental/social issues that ridiculously long fasts trigger, like missing out on family dinners or convincing your partner that going a month without eating is a good idea.
Most people fast to help with losing weight/controlling hunger and locking in gains with their exercise regimes. Going more than, say a week or two, without eating you're just getting diminishing returns for your misery, for the purposes most people look into trying fasting for, and that's ignoring all the mental/social issues that ridiculously long fasts trigger, like missing out on family dinners or convincing your partner that going a month without eating is a good idea.
Diminishing returns in the sense that they won't be seeing many more benefits in the same space of time as they would be on a more comfortable eating plan. Self-improvement is a marathon, not a sprint.Diminishing returns? Are you implying the metabolism slows down? That wouldn't be true... Also you're saying that without even taking into account how much one would want to lose or how lean/overweight they are...
People's social expectations of expecting others to eat and drink with them isn't a benefit when they cant take no for an answer. Each time I've done a 30 day fast I've had no problem with abstaining from food and no problem with any person accepting the reality of my decisions...
Man meadowdrone a four hour window is intense. I don't know how you do it but congratulations. The increased focus, sense of well being, etc, yeah I get none of that. I'm just miserable and hungry as fuck and watching the clock till I can do something about it, and that's all on a 6 hour window.
It's worth it though. Now that the bulk of the weight loss is done, it's time to zero in on the body fat and actually look like something for once in my god damn life.
It depends who you ask really, there is research suggesting even some sweeteners 'break a fast' but that won't stop me from putting a bit of milk and stevia in my coffees.This has probably been asked and answered repeatedly but is there a lower calorie threshold that you can have and that won't 'break' a fast? I usually don't have food from like 5pm until maybe 11 or 12 the next day, but I do tend to have coffee with a minor amount of soymilk in the morning at like 6 or 7.
I don't have a problem with just drinking it black then having it with some milk later in the day when I'm actually eating so whatever. Not actually doing keto either so not sure if this matters at all lol.
This has probably been asked and answered repeatedly but is there a lower calorie threshold that you can have and that won't 'break' a fast? I usually don't have food from like 5pm until maybe 11 or 12 the next day, but I do tend to have coffee with a minor amount of soymilk in the morning at like 6 or 7.
I don't have a problem with just drinking it black then having it with some milk later in the day when I'm actually eating so whatever. Not actually doing keto either so not sure if this matters at all lol.
It depends who you ask really, there is research suggesting even some sweeteners 'break a fast' but that won't stop me from putting a bit of milk and stevia in my coffees.
Most weight loss practitioners will say you can have a splash of milk for adherence purposes but it absolutely breaks your fast. Same thing with bone broth or anything caloric. Your body can also generate a response to things like BCAAs in water. Black coffee actually stops autophagy but not your fast. For the maximum results, lengthen your fasting window as much as possible and only drink water.
I recently switched to OMAD (23:1 fasting) and I'm never going back to 16:8.
Yeah, I've drunk black coffee (espresso) for about five years now. I can't go near sweetened shit now (pretty much anything)If you are doing keto or just avoiding all sugar, you develop a taste for it eventually.
Most weight loss practitioners will say you can have a splash of milk for adherence purposes but it absolutely breaks your fast. Same thing with bone broth or anything caloric. Your body can also generate a response to things like BCAAs in water. Black coffee actually stops autophagy but not your fast. For maximum results, lengthen your fasting window as much as possible and only drink water.
I recently switched to OMAD (23:1 fasting) and I'm never going back to 16:8. You can eat one large, super satiating meal with a lot of variety and it completely blunts your hunger when fasting.
If you are doing keto or just avoiding all sugar, you develop a taste for it eventually.
Another basic question - does shifting around the hours slightly but often do anything detrimental? i.e. eat between 11-4 today but 12-5 tomorrow? I know your body might do things like produce some stomach acid if it's anticipating food but minor and kind of often variations shouldn't do that much, correct?
There's been a lot of argument on that for some time. Not everyone has the same circadian rhythms though.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/24/well/when-we-eat-or-dont-eat-may-be-critical-for-health.html
What do you think of this? IMO it just advocates further for IF but it also recommends to shift the eating window to earlier rather than later in the day. I'm not sure how they came to the time conclusion based on the study they conducted, which seems to merely compare 12-hour and 6-hour eating window groups, but still I'm intrigued. Usually I have an easier time starting my eating window later, like 2PM.
Me too! Only 4 hours to go! Today has been rough, with coworkers eating cannolis and Chicken Express right next to me.