If it's bad, variations of this will be seen often. What a stupid title.
Thanks.watching the trailer again, it's not so bad. i don't even know why i expected something high budget for what is essentially an anime tie-in. i'm optimistic that it'll be a good game.
Kenzodielocke you should put the official upload in the OP.
People only cared because they saw the "PS4" meta-tag.
It's the same song and dance with every new DQ game. Threads with new gameplay info will get less posts than threads talking about platforms and what not.
The gameplay, on the other hand, looks like it's only for little babies. No way I'm playing that.
Do we have any factual information? The game will include all the manga?
Terrible name though.
That name is absolutely killing me.
Square-Enix JP desperately needs one native English speaker to just hang out in their offices to say "no" when they suggest extremely bad game titles.
Era's way too eager to be snarky, that's all. I thought it looked pretty fun, a different take on the franchise - almost had a DBZ Sagas feel to it (but you know, better looking/playing than Sagas obvi lol)Can someone explain to me exactly how this looks bad? I was expecting something truly awful looking at the replies here but instead it looks pretty good? Honestly.
Era's way too eager to be snarky, that's all. I thought it looked pretty fun, a different take on the franchise - almost had a DBZ Sagas feel to it (but you know, better looking/playing than Sagas obvi lol)
In regards to the name, I get what they were going for but surely they had to have known how easy it was to make fun of the name with Strash sounding like Trash. You're setting people up to make fun, Square, even if it's not trash.
And the art style and especially the cutscene animations. It looks so damn good in motion.They really nailed the colors, it looks like an old school anime.
Im in!
Can someone explain to me exactly how this looks bad? I was expecting something truly awful looking at the replies here but instead it looks pretty good? Honestly.
While I think this is a totally fair criticism, I think that was really just the state of fantasy manga in the early 2000s, haha.
The manga is from 89.While I think this is a totally fair criticism, I think that was really just the state of fantasy manga in the early 2000s, haha.
Gamers are strash.Can someone explain to me exactly how this looks bad? I was expecting something truly awful looking at the replies here but instead it looks pretty good? Honestly.
It's way older and one of the best shonen ever.While I think this is a totally fair criticism, I think that was really just the state of fantasy manga in the early 2000s, haha.
I like the 80's anime style character designs. Unique visual hook; which isn't something DQ usually has going for it.
SERVES ME RIGHT FOR JUST LOOKING AT GOOGLE'S INFO PREVIEWGamers are strash.
It's way older and one of the best shonen ever.