• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Was Biden the right Democratic nominee?

  • Yes

    Votes: 321 67.3%
  • No, Bernie was

    Votes: 112 23.5%
  • No, Elizabeth was

    Votes: 23 4.8%
  • No, Amy was

    Votes: 1 0.2%
  • No, Kamala was

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • No, Buttigieg was

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • No, someone else was

    Votes: 8 1.7%

  • Total voters
    477
Status
Not open for further replies.

mjc

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
5,880
I think Bernie would have been a better candidate generally, but not against Trump. He wouldn't be able to stay as collected as Biden has.
 

Dymaxion

Member
Sep 19, 2018
1,138
Yes. Whenever Trump and Pence call Biden and Harris radical leftists and socialists, I cannot help but laugh. No one other than loyal Trump voters would actually believe that line of attack. Their attempts to scream "Blue team bad!!" just have no power behind it.
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,674
Any of the major primary candidate would probably have won. You put Bernie, Warren, Harris, Buttigieg, whoever in that chair right now and they'd be in the lead.

The difference is degrees. Right now Biden has a ~10 point national lead and has 270 electoral votes even without any tossup states. The presidency isn't even a question, the question is how many senate seats we can win. That's what Biden gets you. With someone else, we'd be fighting tooth and nail to maintain a narrower lead. We'd win in the end, but maybe without a senate majority. That sort of thing.

Which is really what's important, so I'd lean yes, Biden was the right choice. He's a low-risk, high-reward candidate. Even if his more moderate rhetoric is going to hold us back on some things, it wouldn't be possible to pass that wildly progressive agenda without the huge mandate his victory would give.

It's really up to Congress to capitalize on the "easy win" here.
Agreed
 

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
39,029
And when it doesn't stick like they want, they try to incite division with Moderate Dems and Progressives. "The radical Left won't like that."

Spot on, but it's pathetic and sad.

Trump's "You just lost the left, you just lost the left, he just lost the left, you just lost the left," during the debate was just so pathetic.
 

Dyle

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
29,938
Every major primary candidate would be well ahead of Trump but I don't think any of them would be as far ahead as Biden is and I doubt some of the Senate races, particularly Iowa and South Carolina, would be going quite as well with other candidates at the top of the national ticket.
 

The Bookerman

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,124
I love bernie and his ideas, but in this type of utter chaos, that's not what the US needs. Needs unity, and bernie would have created too much of a culture clash. And Trump would have loved facing bernie. His bullshit talking points that Biden is a radical left wing nut would have stuck a little more to bernie.
 

Yerffej

Prophet of Regret
Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,536
The enthusiasm doesn't seem to be for Biden, it's against trump and a yearning to go back to the status quo of politics when people could drown it out.
I don't feel like that tracks. Yes there's massive hatred for Trump, but what soared Biden past the others was genuine enthusiasm. There's no getting around that. I don't feel like that's faded. I'd say adding Kamala to the ticket, and taking on more progressive policy has kept that momentum going.
 

Meg Cherry

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,279
Seattle, WA
He literally raped Tara Reade
Literally everyone else has dropped this talking point, because the facts literally do not line up with her account of events. Literally every journalist to investigate the claims found them to be literally false.

It's literally a non-issue, and you're literally a pawn in a far-right misinformation campaign if you're literally still spreading it.
 

Kamek

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,977
I think Kamala, or Pete could have also dealt with him handily, in a calm collected way.
 

ConfusingJazz

Not the Ron Paul Texas Fan.
Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,896
China
1. Return to Normalcy - voters love that shit. They loved it in 1920, they love it in 2020. Whether that's a good thing or not doesn't matter.
2. Nothing is sticking. Nothing.
3. Knows that when the other side is digging a hole, you let them keep going.
 

Ithil

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,386
I think Kamala, or Pete could have also dealt with him handily, in a calm collected way.
It's more than just dealing with Trump in a debate setting, it's how well they work for the whole ticket. Montana for instance, Bullock, the only Dem with a chance to win that Senate seat, was only convinced to run because Biden is the nominee. Places like Kansas wouldn't have their Senate seat in the conversation if Pete was the nominee.
 

Deleted member 4346

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,976
Of course not
Why would a known racist and rapist be the right candidate lol?

Biden voted for the Iraq War, too, which none of the other candidates in the Democratic primary did. That war cost hundreds of thousands of innocent lives. He shares in the blame for that.

Frankly it shows how low our standards have fallen, he's the epitome of "better things aren't possible". Unless the American electorate stops being so goddamned reactionary, or we actually fragment as a nation, we'll probably keep getting this caliber of presidential candidates.
 

Seesaw15

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,819
Yeah he's a clean old white man who is pretty moderate. You can tell the Trump campaign was DYING to go against Bernie with all their Radical Socialist Left attacks. So much so that they essentially grafted those attacks onto Biden with little effect. Imo Biden would have been a worse candidate against Trump in 2016 since he was a career politician going against Trumps outsider-ness. Now that Trump has been fucking up for 4 years Bidens steady hand seems like a great fit.
 

cabelhigh

Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,723
I think Bernie was the only one capable to tackle all the insane bullshit thats happening and come up with real solutions, but Biden might actually have been the only one able to get a wide enough base of support to make it happen.

We'll see tho. The whole "lets turn texas blue" stuff...exact same thing happened with Hillary. And it stayed red.
 

Chaos Legion

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 30, 2017
16,919
If he had caught on, I feel like Beto might have posed a similar foil to Trump.

But this is a great moment for Joseph and I'm happy that it was him.
 

Parthenios

The Fallen
Oct 28, 2017
13,613
I just wished Biden had run in 2016. He would have slaughtered Trump.
I don't think Biden would have beaten Clinton in the primary since I think the voters in the party had largely settled on Clinton long before, but I do think he would have mopped Trump in the general if he'd made it through.

The 2016 primary would have been interesting (moreso than it already was I think) because Biden and Clinton would have been playing at the same voters, so Sanders might have ended up winning the primary in that timeline?
 

Lost Lemurian

Member
Nov 30, 2019
4,297
Yes. Whenever Trump and Pence call Biden and Harris radical leftists and socialists, I cannot help but laugh. No one other than loyal Trump voters would actually believe that line of attack. Their attempts to scream "Blue team bad!!" just have no power behind it.
You can sense that the Trump team really thought that Bernie was gonna win the nomination, and planned their entire strategy around that. And once Biden got it, they had nothing to attack him with, and still can't seem to find anything that sticks.
 

ConfusingJazz

Not the Ron Paul Texas Fan.
Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,896
China
I don't think Biden would have beaten Clinton in the primary since I think the voters in the party had largely settled on Clinton long before, but I do think he would have mopped Trump in the general if he'd made it through.

The 2016 primary would have been interesting (moreso than it already was I think) because Biden and Clinton would have been playing at the same voters, so Sanders might have ended up winning the primary in that timeline?

The party elite were settled on her in 2008, and she got beat. Just because some powerful members of the party want something doesn't mean it will happen. Biden probably would have won in 2016.
 

captmcblack

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,065
I don't agree that he's the best or right candidate to handle it - but it doesn't actually matter, because he is the candidate and hopefully everyone reasonable will help him handle it and win.
 

hurlex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,143
Biden has such a large lead and Trump is fucking up so much you could make an argument Bernie or Warren could still win but Biden gives you the best chance at the presidency and the best chance at the Senate. Winning the Senate is such a big deal so it's best that Biden was the choice.
 

Arkeband

Banned
Nov 8, 2017
7,663
Yes, people couldn't even turn out to win Bernie the nomination, how were they going to turn out in the general?

say it with me: the people who vote in a primary are not the same people who vote in a general.

Additionally, Bernie has a very different set of voters than Biden's - for example, Latinos, anti-establishment, single-issue 2A voters, etc. Go into a rural community and check their temperature on Bernie, you'd be surprised at how they'd go either way between him or Trump.

And this ignores the basic fact that Bernie voters overwhelmingly became Biden voters and I imagine the opposite would happen if the situation was flipped the other way.

Just stop with this awful take, the premise is so removed from reality that it can't be read as anything other than antagonistic.
 

Deleted member 46493

User requested account closure
Banned
Aug 7, 2018
5,231
I've always hated the "Bernie people don't vote" line but I'm starting to believe it. This country is full of conservatives and neolibs who can't get down with a "socialist." As much as I wish it were Bernie, I have a feeling his odds of winning wouldn't be as high as Biden's.
This is the country that violently toppled legitimately elected leaders that flirted with leftist politics and replaced them with right wing dictators. I'll be a leftist/pro-Bernie/etc. for the rest of my life but the US is a fiscally conservative country - it'll always be a long shot.
 

dabig2

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,116
If you are progressive then you are going to be disappointed with Biden and the Democratic party and America in general.

One thing we should have all learned over these past 4 years is that America is in general a lot more dumb and conservative than progressives may have thought it to be. Its sad but America is just more comfortable with an old white guy for president.

Biden probably gives you the best chance to win but I don't think you are going to get real change under him. Just likely a return to 2012.

Generally true, but just had to say "disappointed" is almost selling short for how a lot of us view it.

My one and only take in regards to this election is below:

"Trump and Biden may have argued who would better protect America and her values, but the people in this country must eventually be saved from them both." -

www.theguardian.com

Trump v Biden in the first 2020 presidential debate: our panelists' verdict

Donald Trump set the tone for a brawl that offered a bleak picture of American democracy
The presidential debate did not demonstrate a decline of America's government, but a manifestation of America's government. Trump yelled and cheated his way through, even attacking the moderator in addition to his opponent. He lied often and loudly. Biden's truths were quiet and damaging. He wants to give more money to police. He is against socialism. He is against the Green New Deal.

Biden was audibly frustrated and visibly annoyed with Trump. The former vice-president told him to shut up and called him a clown and a racist. This volley may have ironically saved Biden's performance, as he regularly fumbled through his "uninterrupted" time and rebuttals.

Can only speak for myself, but I ain't treating a Biden admin like I did Obama's. No brownie points for crumbs argued for and doled out. No brownie points for barely lifting that dagger out of our backs. No brownie points for merely talking about systemic damages, and doing barely any work to even educate much less address. The time for all that shit has long since sailed.

Our planet is on fire, inequality worse than it has ever been, pandemics about and only set to rise in coming years, the next financial meltdown guaranteed imminent, etc. Those with greater power should be judged relative to their power (aka judged a hell of a lot more harshly than they are).
 

Poodlestrike

Smooth vs. Crunchy
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
13,496
Thread locked because the election's not over yet, so let's not tempt fate.

(Feel free to report after the election to resume discussion)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.