AgreedAny of the major primary candidate would probably have won. You put Bernie, Warren, Harris, Buttigieg, whoever in that chair right now and they'd be in the lead.
The difference is degrees. Right now Biden has a ~10 point national lead and has 270 electoral votes even without any tossup states. The presidency isn't even a question, the question is how many senate seats we can win. That's what Biden gets you. With someone else, we'd be fighting tooth and nail to maintain a narrower lead. We'd win in the end, but maybe without a senate majority. That sort of thing.
Which is really what's important, so I'd lean yes, Biden was the right choice. He's a low-risk, high-reward candidate. Even if his more moderate rhetoric is going to hold us back on some things, it wouldn't be possible to pass that wildly progressive agenda without the huge mandate his victory would give.
It's really up to Congress to capitalize on the "easy win" here.
And when it doesn't stick like they want, they try to incite division with Moderate Dems and Progressives. "The radical Left won't like that."
He literally raped Tara Reade
I don't feel like that tracks. Yes there's massive hatred for Trump, but what soared Biden past the others was genuine enthusiasm. There's no getting around that. I don't feel like that's faded. I'd say adding Kamala to the ticket, and taking on more progressive policy has kept that momentum going.The enthusiasm doesn't seem to be for Biden, it's against trump and a yearning to go back to the status quo of politics when people could drown it out.
Of course not
Why would a known racist and rapist be the right candidate lol?
Literally everyone else has dropped this talking point, because the facts literally do not line up with her account of events. Literally every journalist to investigate the claims found them to be literally false.
It's more than just dealing with Trump in a debate setting, it's how well they work for the whole ticket. Montana for instance, Bullock, the only Dem with a chance to win that Senate seat, was only convinced to run because Biden is the nominee. Places like Kansas wouldn't have their Senate seat in the conversation if Pete was the nominee.I think Kamala, or Pete could have also dealt with him handily, in a calm collected way.
Of course not
Why would a known racist and rapist be the right candidate lol?
I don't think Biden would have beaten Clinton in the primary since I think the voters in the party had largely settled on Clinton long before, but I do think he would have mopped Trump in the general if he'd made it through.I just wished Biden had run in 2016. He would have slaughtered Trump.
Like, based on latest polling, Biden is closer in Montana than Trump is in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Back in January there wasn't a single Democratic candidate that seemed remotely possible for.
You can sense that the Trump team really thought that Bernie was gonna win the nomination, and planned their entire strategy around that. And once Biden got it, they had nothing to attack him with, and still can't seem to find anything that sticks.Yes. Whenever Trump and Pence call Biden and Harris radical leftists and socialists, I cannot help but laugh. No one other than loyal Trump voters would actually believe that line of attack. Their attempts to scream "Blue team bad!!" just have no power behind it.
I don't think Biden would have beaten Clinton in the primary since I think the voters in the party had largely settled on Clinton long before, but I do think he would have mopped Trump in the general if he'd made it through.
The 2016 primary would have been interesting (moreso than it already was I think) because Biden and Clinton would have been playing at the same voters, so Sanders might have ended up winning the primary in that timeline?
Yes, people couldn't even turn out to win Bernie the nomination, how were they going to turn out in the general?
This is the country that violently toppled legitimately elected leaders that flirted with leftist politics and replaced them with right wing dictators. I'll be a leftist/pro-Bernie/etc. for the rest of my life but the US is a fiscally conservative country - it'll always be a long shot.I've always hated the "Bernie people don't vote" line but I'm starting to believe it. This country is full of conservatives and neolibs who can't get down with a "socialist." As much as I wish it were Bernie, I have a feeling his odds of winning wouldn't be as high as Biden's.
Only Biden and Bernie were in Congress at the time and could vote on it. Framing it that way is misleading.Biden voted for the Iraq War, too, which none of the other candidates in the Democratic primary did.
If you are progressive then you are going to be disappointed with Biden and the Democratic party and America in general.
One thing we should have all learned over these past 4 years is that America is in general a lot more dumb and conservative than progressives may have thought it to be. Its sad but America is just more comfortable with an old white guy for president.
Biden probably gives you the best chance to win but I don't think you are going to get real change under him. Just likely a return to 2012.
"Trump and Biden may have argued who would better protect America and her values, but the people in this country must eventually be saved from them both." -
The presidential debate did not demonstrate a decline of America's government, but a manifestation of America's government. Trump yelled and cheated his way through, even attacking the moderator in addition to his opponent. He lied often and loudly. Biden's truths were quiet and damaging. He wants to give more money to police. He is against socialism. He is against the Green New Deal.
Biden was audibly frustrated and visibly annoyed with Trump. The former vice-president told him to shut up and called him a clown and a racist. This volley may have ironically saved Biden's performance, as he regularly fumbled through his "uninterrupted" time and rebuttals.