-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Impeachment |OT|
- Thread starter Kaitos
- Start date
That was it?! "Ignore any involvement of Giuliani because he was just in Ukraine to defend Trump in the Mueller investigation"? Good lord.
That has to have only come up as a reminder that Trump got off from the Barr-scrubbed conclusions of the report last year. Like it was a defense of Rudy but only built in as a reminder of Trump's old "win."
That has to have only come up as a reminder that Trump got off from the Barr-scrubbed conclusions of the report last year. Like it was a defense of Rudy but only built in as a reminder of Trump's old "win."
Yes. But the American voting public is dumb. They believe the last thing they hear or see.
I kind of love that Schiff preemptively debunked literally everything they're saying in like 15 minutes.
"so-called", right after blabbering about due process. Also, "cross examening witnesses" is something the Senate has to do, not the House, as I understand it.
Good job making the other side's case?
Good job making the other side's case?
So did I misunderstand what he's saying, or did he say that it was not okay to prevent evidence in prior investigations but we don't want evidence now because those prior investigations show he's innocent?
This dude can't be serious. Hes trying so hard to normalize Trump's deranged behavior. We shouldn't try to pursue new evidence and witnesses?
The argument is that the Senate should not do anything (IE Call Witnesses) because the House doesn't have enough evidence. This is because, in many cases, officials did not comply with subpoenas. The only other way this could have ever gone is if the House waited for the legal issues regarding blanket executive privilege to be cleared up. Issue with that is this whole thing could be delayed indefinitely.
Executive Privilege is asserted in a number of prior cases but I don't believe it's ever been abused to the point of being 100% uncooperative like it is currently.
Chewbacca defense - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Ah thanks. I thought that they actually brought up Chewbacca... LOL
wait, am I literally listening to "diplomatic immunity" right now? Somebody call Donald Glover!
Of course they're arguing it. Trump didn't invoke privilege because that would require material to be made available and reviewed before a decision being made. Stonewalling while saying it was privilege without invoking it gave the perfect PR cover.
They're just muddying the waters and saying the Dems were trying to subvert the process, which is obviously the opposite of what happened.
...Yes, I meant Danny Glover.
I'm getting too old for this shit.
But thanks for the correction.
Last edited:
They can get an acquittal without trying, so why would they try