"and with that I'll move onto the second article".
fucking what? How was that an argument AGAINST the first?
"ditto!"
"and with that I'll move onto the second article".
fucking what? How was that an argument AGAINST the first?
Yes he can. But technically, the GOP can just vote to overrule that!Could Roberts just put a halt to everything and say "Okay, enough bullshit call some witnesses"?
Why would heCould Roberts just put a halt to everything and say "Okay, enough bullshit call some witnesses"?
Technically there's no rule saying he can't. But he isn't.Could Roberts just put a halt to everything and say "Okay, enough bullshit call some witnesses"?
Yes he can. But technically, the GOP can just vote to overrule that!
Sekulow going with the "look at these people eating crackers like they own the place" defense. Handing out Pens. THE CHEEK OF IT.
I like when the defense is like, "why didnt tell you this bit of defense evidence?" and it's like, 'um, because they're the prosecution?" lol. like, do they know how trials work?
ShhhhhhhhhhhIsn't the fact that the aid was eventually released w/o any change also.....destroy they're own argument about burden sharing and corruption?
Isn't the fact that the aid was eventually released w/o any change also.....destroy they're own argument about burden sharing and corruption?