This how the world sees the US. The US call Democrats "liberal", but most Americans are unfamiliar with world politics and "real" liberal parties. The US is conservative. There are extreme versions of conservative, but that doesn't make everybody else liberal. The US is conservative. Almost all of it.
Being liberal in the US is relative to the population. So, perhaps if I compare my views to the average European, I'm conservative (though I doubt it being as my policy views on the economy/society are far more socialist/Marxist than what any European country is). However, comparing my views to the average American, I'm liberal.
Most of my views on policy are quite socialist, but my views on other things temper me down to what would be considered a liberal by most Americans, a neoliberal by some progressive Americans, and (maybe) a conservative by a hardcore Marxist Asian. Of course, what the nonAmerican labels me as is the most irrelevant since I'm an American and how my views look next to another American is way more important for American politics.
Nah, that's pretty bullshit and I can back pocket an example as to why. Economically Harris and Biden are to Obama's left, we can agree on that, yes?
Good.
In 2009, during the economic crash, the EU's right of center, we all agree that Merkel's EU leadership was right of center I hope, decided that it would meet the challenges presented by recession with austerity measures. Meanwhile, in the US, President Obama and the Democratic lead congress (which, I will remind you, was still full of blue dog Democrats, so actual conservative Dems) invested heavily in massive stimulus projects.
The argument that Democrats are conservative is shit that folks with little more political knowledge than online hot takes say.
The fact of the matter is that most of the US's more regressive tendencies are rooted in racism. Which is a problem we've been dealing with more actively and openly than most EU countries for a long time. It's easy to pass social programs when your population is homogeneous and your white folks aren't acting up. But, as Europe is learning, when your populations start getting a little browner, suddenly there's a problem.
Yeah, I agree with you there. I get it's mostly people being hyperbolic but there are people who read that and really believe it, and it's just so woefully ignorant imo.
And it is pretty amusing to see Europeans go on and go about their supposed more-enlightened takes on racism. I've seen the same level of racism out of Europe as I have in the US, and watching Europe become slightly browner and reacting by having more support for racist, nationalistic groups kinds of shows that maybe some populations aren't as progressive as they think.
Also this. Leftists need to get it through their skulls that trying to tell liberals that they don't know what a liberal is will not actually garner them any support, it just makes them look like loons. The progressive leftists are a tiny, tiny sliver of the American population. You're not a voting bloc, you're not a force to be reckoned with, you're currently just another weirdo with a sign on a street corner. Until you start speaking the language and engaging with the system, you're going to continue to be ignored, because there are no consequences to ignoring you.
Ehhh, I have to disagree with some of it.
I'm definitely a "liberal" by most progressive standards and I'm fine with it. I don't think progressives are loons, I think we just have different ideas of temperament or implementation for change, and being more extreme probably means your personality is a bit more emotional/passionate in terms of discussing these ideas.
They are a voting bloc within our larger "left" side and they're trying to push the party left, including the moderate Democrats. To me, that shows they *are* trying to get people to agree with them, and I respect and salute the effort. It makes sense-- if you want more progressives, you have to turn non-progressives into progressives.
I think a key part of what makes an American progressive is someone who is disillusioned with the system so much that they don't want to participate in it because, to them, participation in the system is propping up the system. For some, this means that the better solution, and the solution they want, is to burn the system down and start again. I, as a liberal, don't agree it's the better solution and I believe in the slow, inefficient, but less violent system we have now.
However, a progressive should continue to preach their views if they want to convince others to join them. Having them just shut up and engage in the system the way a "moderate" engages goes against what it means, for them, to be progressive. Asking them to shut up and engage in the system the way we want is effectively the same as them telling us we need to do what they think is best.
At the end of the day, I'd like people to consider the many different layers and issues and beliefs and pick the one they believe in. I don't think asking one group to give up their beliefs is right... we should allow for a marketplace of ideas (lolol) with choice.
Would be great for that huge swath of mystical moderate conservatives to come out and say how ridiculous Trump is being about not conceding and trying to challenge the election results with absolutely no legal evidence in multiple states where only he lost.
I'm sure this increasing swell of moderate conservatives will let their numbers be known any day now.
Eh, people who vote Trump probably don't think moderate Democrats exist (I mean, to them, Kamala and Biden are the same level of socialist as Sanders)... but obviously there's a gap between moderate Demos and progressives. We've definitely heard Republicans say that Trump *should* concede peacefully but we don't really pay any attention to them because we write them off as one and the same.