What if its a very good indie game using an older game engine
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
If a single-player game, released in year 2045 with lots of polish and with great acclaims, somehow traveled in time to year 2020, what will you do?
- Thread starter delete12345
- Start date
What if its a very good indie game using an older game engine
Even indie games use newer Api's and operating systems.
But if the set of circumstances are going to be very specific OP should of laid them out.
Sure; I mean, people are making games for 1980s microcomputers and consoles that are often better than anything that was made back then; but these are not exactly mainstream and rarely the recipients of "great acclaim". Are we talking of sending one of these, or, say, a Switch with BotW? Because it's really night and day between these two scenarios.
As a gamer, I can only assume that technological progress is a straight unbroken line stretching into infinity. I won't be able to play the game because I don't have a 64K TV.
not entirely sure what you mean by donate to charity, like the funds from selling it? probably wouldnt go for more than $400 or so
if i even had some way to play it i would, then id donate it to a games museum and hopefully it could be ripped and distributed for free as well
if i even had some way to play it i would, then id donate it to a games museum and hopefully it could be ripped and distributed for free as well
Given how games looked 20 years ago compared to now I don't even know if i would comprehend anything about it. I envision some ready player one type vr stuff in the next 5 years or so, beyond that is crazy talk trying to think where the tech will go.
Voted "Hide it in secret and take it with you to your grave." but really I think I'd probably end up destroying it.
I've seen movies... nothing good could come from this.
Honestly though, I'd try to play it, but me trying would probably look a little something like this...
I've seen movies... nothing good could come from this.
Honestly though, I'd try to play it, but me trying would probably look a little something like this...
How are controllers going to look in 20 years too, I have a feeling we will be beyond twin stick and even mouse and keyboard for PC and maybe using some sort of virtual controller where the system itself can see your movements and uses that for controlling. Sort of like Kinect I guess but even beyond that.Voted "Hide it in secret and take it with you to your grave." but really I think I'd probably end up destroying it.
I've seen movies... nothing good could come from this.
Honestly though, I'd try to play it, but me trying would probably look a little something like this...
Reverse engineer the physical format it's on, sell it to a big corporation.
Reverse engineer game, sell off bits of middleware, new graphical effects and optimisations.
Reverse engineer engine, become dominant engine for next 20 years.
Or, market new amazing engine, put out "render demos" from this future game, get tons of investment, bail with the money.
Reverse engineer game, sell off bits of middleware, new graphical effects and optimisations.
Reverse engineer engine, become dominant engine for next 20 years.
Or, market new amazing engine, put out "render demos" from this future game, get tons of investment, bail with the money.
I'd take a screenshot of it running on Stadia just to troll the haters
Honestly though ... I'm a software engineer who works with smart people, I'd probably try to get a group of hobbyists at my work to reverse engineer the binaries and glean what useful tokens of development experience and new techniques we can get from it.
Honestly though ... I'm a software engineer who works with smart people, I'd probably try to get a group of hobbyists at my work to reverse engineer the binaries and glean what useful tokens of development experience and new techniques we can get from it.
I mean as said, you wouldn't be able to play it, and even if it were a PC game, it probably wouldn't even boot. It would be trying to run on hardware and APIs/drivers that don't yet exist.
But assuming it comes with some means to play it, then it depends on the game. If it's DOTA 4 or something, I'd be interested in the graphics and nothing else. But if it's GTA or some kind of big open world game, I'd be too excited not to check it out. Then I'd spend the next 25 years being disappointed in everything leading up to it. :p
But assuming it comes with some means to play it, then it depends on the game. If it's DOTA 4 or something, I'd be interested in the graphics and nothing else. But if it's GTA or some kind of big open world game, I'd be too excited not to check it out. Then I'd spend the next 25 years being disappointed in everything leading up to it. :p
Did I stumble into a Buzzfeed quiz?
I'm no time travel expert but I think any attempt to make the game known (as a complete, finished product) would probably cause a time paradox (if, for example, Cyberpunk 2077 went back in time to 1995, and that was public info, I don't think CD Projekt Red would be making it in 2020).
I'd probably upload it onto the Internet. Let software engineers and gamers alike enjoy it. Can't infringe on a copyright that won't exist for another 25 years (and I'd probably be the copyright owner anyways, maybe? And thus I could just release it under Creative Commons), and fuck it, let's see how time travel works, what's the worst that could happen, paradox shmaradox if you know what I'm saying
(I voted "donated it to charity" since that's the closest option to what I would do, and I would give the original copy to a museum if they wanted it)
Last edited:
I think the only think you could possibly do with a 2045 game on a 2020 PC is try to decompile and analyze the individual components. You wouldn't be able to play it even with the highest end workstation PCs available today, and even if you had the performance needed you wouldn't have dependences such as the OS, drivers, APIs and hardware features needed to make it run anyway.
But if the code could be decompiled, that could probably tell you a whole lot about the hardware and software that exists in the future. And hey, you'd probably be able also get an understanding of the game's gameplay, maybe even view the art assets of the game (I mean the .obj file format used 3D assets is now 30 years old and still in use, so I'm sure a lot of data formats used in the 2040-era game will be familiar as well.)
That's assuming the game is a digital file, if it's a physical game existing on some future medium then the medium itself would probably be more interesting to researchers.
But if the code could be decompiled, that could probably tell you a whole lot about the hardware and software that exists in the future. And hey, you'd probably be able also get an understanding of the game's gameplay, maybe even view the art assets of the game (I mean the .obj file format used 3D assets is now 30 years old and still in use, so I'm sure a lot of data formats used in the 2040-era game will be familiar as well.)
That's assuming the game is a digital file, if it's a physical game existing on some future medium then the medium itself would probably be more interesting to researchers.
hahaha, I had a similar thought. This setup seems like a trap.
If you are a character in this story, it's going to break bad for you.
How about play the game, then file a trademark, make copies of it to sell, THEN sell the "original copy" to highest bidder.
I'll probably keep it till the hardware to play it is out
Then probably demo it to publishers and get funding and release it
Then probably demo it to publishers and get funding and release it
Maybe it's not a physical copy at all, but rather something that can be streamed to the past via Google Stadia. the catch- you need subscribe to Stadia.
Given the fact that I'm not streaming anything that's done via Steam Link or Parsec, playing it is even less of an option.
No way to play it.
It would be like somebody in 1995 getting a copy of Last of Us PT2. It'd look mind-blowing from the box, but they would have no way of playing the game.
It would be like somebody in 1995 getting a copy of Last of Us PT2. It'd look mind-blowing from the box, but they would have no way of playing the game.
I'd stare longingly at the quantum disc it's stored on and wonder how it operates in a state somewhere in between spinning and not spinning.
Interesting question. I understand what you mean, but the way you asked it was strange and unclear.
There's nothing on earth that would keep me from playing that thing.
There's nothing on earth that would keep me from playing that thing.
I would look into the data on the disc and see who created the game. If they are around yet, I would give it to them or keep it until they exist and give it to them then.
Go tell ERA that Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 2 will be released in 2045.
People will laugh, I'll bookmark the thread then 25 years later I'll bump the thread to laugh at everyone.
People will laugh, I'll bookmark the thread then 25 years later I'll bump the thread to laugh at everyone.
Maybe a version of Dwarf Fortress with hard limits to prevent too much CPU usage?
Well, Dwarf Fortress is a 2006 game; to match the OP's conditions, you'd have to send it to 1981. :)