Right, so you can't just copy a game without restriction. That's DRM.
Sure. Like, definitionally it is. There's a lot of nuanced takes on if it is or isn't, but ultimately it is. If you are absolutely opposed to DRM in any form, then that is something I entirely understand. It's a position I have sympathy with, and certainly lament the fact that rather than information being free, it's increasingly locked down and controlled by megacorps and governments. I do like GOG a lot and hope they continue to make more DRM free games available, which is obviously a good thing for everyone.
But most people outside of the Free Software Movement don't take such an absolutist stance. It's always a trade off, does X DRM mean I have access to Y features? If Y features are good enough, then that may be acceptable. I, personally, find the features offered by Steamworks to be an acceptable trade off for CEG. Other forms of DRM offer far less features (if any), so my view on how acceptable they are differs.
Still, I am unsure as to the point of this thread outside of the OP taking an absolutist stance against DRM and asking why everyone else doesn't. Which is a bold ask.
In short,
hack the planet.