RE games are short games, most of which can finish in 12 hours. Annual release not a problem
They also tend to be different enough from each other. Of the games OP mentioned:RE games are short games, most of which can finish in 12 hours. Annual release not a problem
If the quality holds up then I have no issues with it.
I kinda wish the games were longer though, I really don't believe the so called ''perfect length''
Just because you don't have much free time doesn't mean a 6 hour long game is more perfect than a 20 hour one.
RE4 was about 10 times longer than RE7 & RE2 Remake and it was just as replay-able, if not better.
Alien Isolation was very long as well and people loved it.
Origins didn't come out the year after Syndicate.
They also tend to be different enough from each other. Of the games OP mentioned:
So yeah, risk of burnout is pretty minimal.
- RE7 is first-person survival horror (potentially played in VR).
- RE2 is third-person survival horror.
- RE3 is third-person action horror.
- RE: Resistance is asymmetrical multiplayer with survivors versus a mastermind and traps.
Starting anew can have its downsides as well, even if I can respect what they did with RE7.I'd say the burnout comes from repetition of the premise in the horror genre, rather than the gameplay. Hence RE7 needed to cut out so much of what came before.
If anything, I wish RE7 went further with its separation from the rest of the series in order to be able to sustain the horror and mystery for a whole new trilogy.
Remakes of past games in the series should not be included in the every year talk since they were already established. Now、 if it were actually new titles/entries in the series then yeah that can be understood but remakes dont count.Look, Capcom is doing great and they deliver the good shit nowadays but i think they are releasing too many Resident Evil titles.
From 2017 to 2020 we will have 4 Resident Evil games released (RE7, RE2, Resistance and RE3), i understand Resident Evil is a major brand of Capcom and it's the only horror series that can still sell millions but releasing a new game every year, in the long run, is going to hurt the sales, 2 years between RE7 and RE2 were perfect imo.
RE7 and RE2 did good sales wise, Capcom was smart to bundle RE Resistance with RE3 but i don't think the latter will do as good as RE2.
I really expected RE3 by 2021 and RE8 in 2023, but at this pace we are most likely getting RE8 in 2021 and the next REmake in 2022...
What do you guys think? Are you ok with Resident Evil yearly release?
Capcom is calling a complete game since it has a SP mode and multiplayer.
It is not "RE3 Online mode".
Are you absolutely sure about this being a separate thing from RE3? In the State of Play, they specifically introduced RE3 as the single player campaign for Resistance. This article is from September.No, it's not.
RE Resistance is a complete game, with both MP and SP
Non-existent enemy variety (excluding the Baker family, of course). There's biped Molded and quadruped Molded. That's more or less it. Nothing as good as the classics like Lickers, Hunters, Las Plagas, etc.
No, it's not.
RE Resistance is a complete game, with both MP and SP
The reason why RE4 was so long is partly because it had such a long dev time. I don't expect we will see a RE game come close to that length anytime soon. Certainly not if there is a yearly release schedule in place. So i do wish that Capcom eases it up just a little bit next gen.
Yeah, an article from September. And then they announced that Resident Evil 3 is the Single Player mode of that game recently during the Sony stream. Has anyone even watched the announcement of the game, and the way they framed it?
RE Resistance is the MP mode of Resident Evil 3 to the point where there's screenshots of it on the Resident Evil 3 Steam page. Why do people not understand this lol
RE3 reveal on Stat of Play was literally introduced as "reveal of the unannounced campaign portion of Project Resistance".No, it's not.
RE Resistance is a complete game, with both MP and SP
It deserved the nom. It's based on an older game, but it's also its own thing, just like FF7R will be its own thing and most likely also nominated.Too late, the media nominated 2 for a Game of the Year nom....for a old ass story.
As long as people buy them they will prioritize them over other titles it seems.
They aren't.Look, Capcom is doing great and they deliver the good shit nowadays but i think they are releasing too many Resident Evil titles.
From 2017 to 2020 we will have 4 Resident Evil games released (RE7, RE2, Resistance and RE3), i understand Resident Evil is a major brand of Capcom and it's the only horror series that can still sell millions but releasing a new game every year, in the long run, is going to hurt the sales, 2 years between RE7 and RE2 were perfect imo.
RE7 and RE2 did good sales wise, Capcom was smart to bundle RE Resistance with RE3 but i don't think the latter will do as good as RE2.
I really expected RE3 by 2021 and RE8 in 2023, but at this pace we are most likely getting RE8 in 2021 and the next REmake in 2022...
What do you guys think? Are you ok with Resident Evil yearly release?
Yeah, an article from September. And then they announced that Resident Evil 3 is the Single Player mode of that game recently during the Sony stream. Has anyone even watched the announcement of the game, and the way they framed it?
RE Resistance is the MP mode of Resident Evil 3 to the point where there's screenshots of it on the Resident Evil 3 Steam page. Why do people not understand this lol