"and that often means not firing serial abusers, because to fire them would somehow be an admission of wrongdoing by the company. While I am utterly heartbroken by your story, HR departments refusing to take action no longer surprise me"
This quote from one of the tweets, I just... don't understand how the "mind" of HR works in a situation like this.
- Someone at the company is being a fuck
- Fire them for being a fuck
- Bad PR???
VS
- Someone at the company is being a fuck
- Fire the snitch and cover up the issue
- Good PR!?!!
I don't get it. You can still like the games. I've just finished Platinuming Spiderman. I'm still playing through it's final DLC and I don't plan on stopping. I still support this ex-employee and hope Insomniac does something more to change the culture of its space (Even though I doubt we'll ever actually see any of such changes).
Blindly defending these companies just because they made something you enjoyed is just mind boggling.
They're not talking about being halfway through Spider-Man and throwing it away. They're talking about the moral dilemma that now exists where people want to play a
future game by a company they now know fosters a hostile and abusive work environment. You can "not care" and buy the game, giving money to the company that's treating its employees like shit, or you can not buy the game, making a statement if enough people do it too. Doing the latter can also hurt the good employees that worked hard and deserve recognition, but the over-all message from buying the games in the future is, "Yeah, it sucks that they're abusive and sexist, but, I want to play the new Spider-Man game on PS5"