I love the motion blue in MT framework era Capcom games. Its not good, but it looks weird and I like it.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
I fucking love motion blur in games. Who's with me?
- Thread starter Lant_War
- Start date
That's eye adaption and if you want realistic graphics you need it, it's not even about simulating eye behaviour but rather about removing the limitation of what the lighting engine can show without the textures losing detail to overexposure (white crush) or underexposure (black crush), unless you want the whole world to be dimly lit throughout which is unrealistic and also looks ugly. If you want to look at examples of games that don't have it then look at any of the old games without HDR lighting like some early PS360 games where the textures would lose all detail anytime there was anything even slightly bright or slightly darker than normal.
If I'm not wrong, basically it's not really possible to show areas lit by the brightest lightsource (sun/explosion) and areas that are completely unlit at the same time and have them both have the same level of clarity with the same intensity (or lackthereof), even with the range that HDR TVs provide. The game is essentially shown to you through a virtual camera, as such it has to follow the same rules as a real camera/eye when it comes to certain elements like these. So even if you don't want games to behave like eye, it pretty much has to do it the more realistic you make a game's graphics. That is my understanding ofcourse, unless I'm just talking pure conjecture.
Last edited:
Why are people saying that motion blur only helps to mimic movies?
Rapidly move your fingers in front of you. What do you see?
Motion blur helps mimic your own eyes.
Rapidly move your fingers in front of you. What do you see?
Motion blur helps mimic your own eyes.
The only time I don't like motion blur is for certain screenshots... but usually if it's good per object motion blur I'll even keep it on for screenshots.
For SFV I have to turn it off for screen shots, but in motion I love it. It gives the game more fluidity. The console version actually hurts my eyes for some reason because it looks to juddery in between the frames of animation.
Best to click that HD button for 60FPS.
Most people hate it in SFV. I love it.
For SFV I have to turn it off for screen shots, but in motion I love it. It gives the game more fluidity. The console version actually hurts my eyes for some reason because it looks to juddery in between the frames of animation.
Best to click that HD button for 60FPS.
Most people hate it in SFV. I love it.
In 30fps games I need it because I can't stand the camera panning or big movements if there was no motion blur. It's a necessity for me in 30fps games. For 60fps on a PC I disable it because it serves no purpose to me. I only welcome it on 30fps console games because it needs it.
I also remove depth of field, never cared for it in games.
I also remove depth of field, never cared for it in games.
No thank you. I prefer image quality to not decrease when I move the camera.
It's a necessary evil at 30 FPS though.
It's a necessary evil at 30 FPS though.
Use to hate film grain and would turn it off whenever a game gave me the option. Then I found out in many games it reduces color banding, so now I keep it on. I absolutely loath color banding.
I generally love it, which is interesting because I detest pretty much every other post-processing visual effect (chromatic aberration, film grain, vignetting, etc).
I say generally because the motion blur effect was Godawful in Uncharted 4 and I ended up disabling it entirely.
I say generally because the motion blur effect was Godawful in Uncharted 4 and I ended up disabling it entirely.
If it eats performance, I have to turn off motion blur.
Sorry, but graphics cards ain't cheap, and I want to squeeze as much power as I can from them.
Sorry, but graphics cards ain't cheap, and I want to squeeze as much power as I can from them.
This. I dont think people really understand what they're talking about at all in this thread lol. How the fuck does motion blur ruin the game for you or make you sick? It's not that different than having it off.
Someone during the development did this exact same thing and said: "Looks fine to me."
Motion Blur, Chromatic Aberration, Film Grain, Vignette, Depth of Field and Lens Flare are the first things I look for in any game settings to turn off, I hate all these things.
that's a joke pic I hope.I generally love it, which is interesting because I detest pretty much every other post-processing visual effect (chromatic aberration, film grain, vignetting, etc).
I say generally because the motion blur effect was Godawful in Uncharted 4 and I ended up disabling it entirely.
I don't mind slight motion blur on 60fps games. most new games have the option to turn it down so I am ok with it.
I usually turn it off or midway like in Uncharted 4.
I'm curious what motion blur setting people use on Metro Exodus on consoles. I put it on Low on the XB1X and it seems fine.
I'm curious what motion blur setting people use on Metro Exodus on consoles. I put it on Low on the XB1X and it seems fine.
I don't think I've ever turned it off, so if it's what the developer intended I would keep it on. :)
To me, it suggests that some people must "process" visual information differently.
In the real world, I can track a moving object with my eyes to virtually eliminate motion blur. This is how you're able to read signs when inside a moving vehicle for example.
In a video game; not necessarily a racing game, but more likely a first-person one, the signs would often be completely blurred and you'd have to stop if you wanted to read them - or completely turn your view so that they are centered in it, since games don't do eye tracking.
When I am trying to look at an object, but the game is blurring my view because the camera is moving, that disconnect can trigger immediate motion sickness for me.
I think it's because my body doesn't feel like it's moving at all, but my eyes are telling me that I'm moving at a high speed. Or something like that.
That short Final Fantasy Type-0 video posted earlier immediately starts to make me feel motion sick.
Per-object motion blur is different, and when it's well-implemented it can enhance the visuals of a game - even though it does sometimes end up breaking the ability to track a moving object with your eyes.
There are some things which move so quickly that you cannot track them, and they will always be blurred - at least when viewed under flicker-free lighting. POMB is great at simulating this effect and is far more true-to-life than without it.
300 vote for liking motion blur ?
I thought this was something we agreed it sucks.
What's next? You all are gonna say Film Grains are better ??
Edit :
lol, oh God.
I thought this was something we agreed it sucks.
What's next? You all are gonna say Film Grains are better ??
Edit :
lol, oh God.
Film grain can be fantastic when it fits aesthetics. Like alien isolation, evil within, outlast, resident evil, mass effect and so on
