This is simply not true. Otherwise threads like this wouldn't explode like this.It's Nintendo and, for whatever reason, the gaming populace gives them a pass on modern features.
Yeah my primary concern is normally that the publisher saves money by stripping out basic features at the expense of the player's experience, too. Nintendo cannot afford such luxuries with a niche IP like Zelda at this juncture.I disagree, local multiplayer costs no money to uphold,bwhile online costs a decent amount of money to uphold. But to each their own.
Here comes the defense force. Keep paying for inferior products and I'm sure Nintendo will be quick to change to be more inclusive of people that don't/can't meet up IRL to play.
Yeah uh... OP shouldn't be banned for this. He's just upset that there isn't online multiplayer in this game. 3 days is overkill. I mean c'mon now. I'm NOT attacking the mods. 3 days is just overkill. Give him a warning or something instead.You posted so quick I doubt you read the OP anyway, but sweet so you're just straight happy that people like me and my friend get screwed out what should be a basic feature in 2020. Thanks for the useless selfish take, ass.
Even though Donkey Kong wasn't the point, OP mentioned it. I simply stated that I don't think all games need to have online multiplayer. There's no reason to be extra salty.I'm so glad you are the sole arbiter of how people should play games.
There is no one who would enjoy playing a platformers online.
Certainly no one who is in quarantined.
Certainly no one who is laid up in a hospital.
Certainly no one who is less strict about gameplay in lag as you must not exist on this wide green earth.
Never you mind we aren't even talking about platformers in the first place.
On the same system, yeah.
Using phrases like "defense force" and "shoveling shit" won't really help you get your point across, it makes you sound more like a toxic console warrior.
No online game is perfect. Never played maker 2 online, but never had much issue with kart. Arms is actually one of the better online games for a fighting game that doesn't (apparently) use rollback netcode. Some people are even convinced it does due to how good it is.What about Mario Maker 2? Or the occasional hitches in Mario Kart and ARMS?
But I liked that multiplayer and they should bring it back.Takes like this are why they shoehorned multiplayer into Metroid Prime 2, and I cannot advise such actions.
Thank you!On the same system, yeah.
And I agree that this is a bummer. Between the three options, I wanted either online or local on two consoles. We only seem to be getting split screen. Lame
Guess I need to get my eyes checked because for some reason I thought OP said the Wii U version had online.
Don't buy it
Also Warriors games don't generally have online, do they?
Every warriors game that isn't from Nintendo or the Persona spin off has online multiplayer afaik
the original Hyrule Warriors does not have online co-op. Just couch co-opGuess I need to get my eyes checked because for some reason I thought OP said the Wii U version had online.
Heh the funny thing is that most people responding in this thread agree that online MP would be a nice addition.Answer: all the people in this thread who believe every single decision Nintendo makes is the right one
It's one thing to not read the OP but they didn't even read the post directly above theirs.
AoC has already been confirmed to have local multiplayer, yet no online.
I am so, so fucking sick of giving Nintendo a pass on this shit. Especially in times like these.
-The Dynasty Warriors series and it's spin-offs have had online multiplayer as part of nearly every one of their games for OVER A DECADE.
-You know what games in this criteria and time frame don't have online multiplayer? The Nintendo ones. Hyrule Warriors (2014), Fire Emblem Warriors (2017), and Hyrule Warriors Legends/Switch (2016/2018).
-As far as I can tell, aside from the ones that only offer single player (aka Persona 5 Scramble) and possibly a few stragglers I missed from the early 2010's (although I'm really not sure if there are any), these are the ONLY games in this group that have not featured online multiplayer. So please don't come in with the "IT'S GOTTA BE KOEI'S DOING NO WAY GORGEOUS SEXY NINTENDO WOULD HAVE A SAY IN THIS EVEN THOUGH THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME".
This is fucking bullshit. And along with the last point, for the love of god don't post senseless purely defensive options like "it doesn't need it" or "no one even cares".
My best friend was my former roommate. When Hyrule Warriors on the Wii U came out, 85% of the time we played it in co-op. It was an absolute blast. Nearly every single day after work, we'd start chipping away at adventure mode. Some of the best gaming memories of my life, really.
When Hyrule Warriors re-released on the Switch, we were pumped. But we don't live together anymore, and the game (fucking SOMEHOW) did not include online multiplayer in the update to the Switch. We debated it but especially since we'd already played it so much before, neither of us bought it, when we would have in a heartbeat if it had online. Fuck we probably would have bought Fire Emblem Warriors if it had online even though we don't give much of a shit about FE, but of course it also didn't fucking have it for some god damn reason.
Now, here comes the release of AoC. That same friend loved BotW more than he's ever loved a Zelda game before. Combine that with his love for HW, and needless to say he and I were ecstatic at the announcement. But that joy was quickly deflated when we learned it only had local co-op. During this pandemic, we're even less likely to see each other if at all. Being able to play this game with him online would have been a warm, cozy house in the middle of a fucking shit storm. So it may not mean a lot to you, but it means a hell of a lot to me and I'm sure there are plenty of others in a similar boat. Don't be a jerk.
Yet alas, even though the Switch's whole deal is that being able to play on your own individual console is awesome, even though we're in the middle of a pandemic, even though it's fucking 2020 and it's CRAZY THAT THIS IS STILL A THING, AoC does not have online multiplayer. "Pass a joycon to a friend!!" they say. Fuck you I say.
Games Nintendo have released recently (or are releasing shortly) that have no online when they absolutely fucking should have:
-Every Wii U port besides 3D World. That they charge 60$ for
-Tropical Freeze
-NSMBU
-Pikmin 3
-Hyrule Warriors
-Fire Emblem Warriors
-Kirby Star Allies
-Super Mario Party (yeah it's got a shit online mode but let's be real it doesn't count).
-Yoshi's Crafted World
And that's not even counting the games that have online multiplayer, but are severely limited in basic features, like playing with friends. Such as the recently released Super Mario Bros. 35.
Super Mario 3D World is gonna have online, and that was extremely surprising and wonderful announcement. But it should not be that surprising that they're finally doing with that game what they should have done with all these others. This should be the rule, not the exception.
I know everyone is hype for a new Zelda game, but don't feel like you can't ask questions just because it's something you want so bad. That's what they want. I know I for one am beyond done on this shit and I won't be picking up the game at launch. I want answers.
Nintendo, as the publisher and licenser of the game, can make any demand they want to the developer and they have to comply or the contract can be terminated. If Nintendo says "Add Pikachu to the game" and KT says no, Nintendo can just pull the rug out from under them and end the project completely. What's the worst that can happen to them, Nintendo loses a few million from an early termination? They've lost worse, and I'm sure they have plenty of stipulations added to the contract anyway to make it so their will is as strongly imposed as possible.
Jesus Christ I don't even care too much for the game (found Hyrule Warriors kinda fun at kiosks but doubt I'd ever have fun long term, especially for $60), but some of the takes here are fucking awful.
How the fuck can people defend basic features being missing from the game using the excuse of "Eh, I don't use it"? May as well remove every character from the game but Link and Zelda, since you won't use anybody else, or remove Pro Controller support from the game because, well, those are too expensive anyway.
Nintendo, as the publisher and licenser of the game, can make any demand they want to the developer and they have to comply or the contract can be terminated. If Nintendo says "Add Pikachu to the game" and KT says no, Nintendo can just pull the rug out from under them and end the project completely. What's the worst that can happen to them, Nintendo loses a few million from an early termination? They've lost worse, and I'm sure they have plenty of stipulations added to the contract anyway to make it so their will is as strongly imposed as possible.
How does this even make sense? What console is the implied allegiance to??? The only console warrior implications I see are from the people blindly defending blatant faults like this. No one has a vendetta against Nintendo just because they call out the obvious. That accusation makes entirely no sense.Using phrases like "defense force" and "shoveling shit" won't really help you get your point across, it makes you sound more like a toxic console warrior.
Additional features, especially if they are as huge as online multiplayer often come at the cost of other possible content I might care more about (and to care more about something than online multiplayer is a very low threshold), so I have no desire to urge any developer to invest into online multiplayer. The question was why it is accetable to not have multiplayer, and while I am not up in arms about a possible inclusion of online multiplayer (as long as it does not hurt the always offline singleplayer experience), I have no trouble accepting the absence of online mp. Do you find the absence of features that you don't use anyway (and are not accessibility features) unacceptable?I definitely don't understand this mindset but I don't think about things only if they are something I enjoy/use or not.
For Dynasty Warriors games, it should be standard.I agree that online would be nice but I don't think it should be a standard for certain games.
Why? the performance of all of them is shit
I don't think I implied I wanted garbage online; I'm surprised I have to clarify. It should be standard for DW games to have good online, considering I love the local co-op in them and have since DW2.
Because it has multiplayer, and we're still in a pandemic. I ain't inviting friends over to play in my living room.
It does? Honestly didn't know that.Because it has multiplayer, and we're still in a pandemic. I ain't inviting friends over to play in my living room.
Coop is the best way to play Musou games. You should try sometime. It's very fun.Why does this game need online?
It's a BOTW prequel more than a musou, so IMO it doesn't even need multiplayer at all.
I played Hyrule Warriors with local co-op on Wii U. It was great. The asymmetrical multiplayer using the GamePad and the TV was real neat; I wish more games on Wii U did it.Coop is the best way to play Musou games. You should try sometime. It's very fun.
Yea ,i dunno why people are celebrating 3D world's onlin just yet. With Nintendo anything can happen when it comes to onlineI hope you guys are prepared for 3D World's online to be truly awful.