I have no issue with the money itself, but there are some good schools that actually do try and play by the rules. I also have no problem seeing Duke get punished.Zero issue with this but hopefully it'll shut up some of the Duke fans on the internet that love to say their school is clean. Every school is dirty because that's what happens when you refuse to let kids get paid.
It is a bold strategylmao this sports agency is gonna go bankrupt after this cause no one would dare sign with them if they're pulling shit like this. Ya hate to see it.
Exactly what it is.
• Sharonda Sampson, Williamson's mother, and Lee Anderson, his stepfather, "demanded and received gifts and economic benefits from persons acting on behalf of Duke University (directly and/or indirectly) to influence [Williamson] to attend Duke University to play basketball."
• Sampson and Anderson "demanded and received gifts, money and/or other benefits from persons on behalf of Nike (directly and/or indirectly) to influence [Williamson] to attend Duke University to play basketball."
• Sampson and Anderson "demanded and received gifts, money and/or other benefits from persons acting on behalf of Adidas (directly and/or indirectly) to influence [Williamson] to wear Adidas shoes" and to "influence [Williamson] to attend a college that endorsed Adidas shoes."
• Before becoming a student at Duke, Williamson "or person(s) acting on [his] behalf (including but not limited to Sharonda Sampson and Lee Anderson) accepted benefits from a NCAA-certified agent that are not expressly permitted by the NCAA legislation" between Jan. 1, 2014, and April 14, 2019.
The NCAA has never given a damn about it's image or public perception. They are too far up their own ass to care.Since the NCAA is now letting student athletes make some money off their likenesses and is rapidly bleeding talent to the NBA's news iteration of the G League, wouldn't sanctioning Duke in any way look terrible for them right now?
The whole case revolves around an archaic system that shouldn't have ever existed.
The NCAA doesn't care how they look.Since the NCAA is now letting student athletes make some money off their likenesses and is rapidly bleeding talent to the NBA's news iteration of the G League, wouldn't sanctioning Duke in any way look terrible for them right now?
The whole case revolves around an archaic system that shouldn't have ever existed.
I mean if they paid a dude last year they probably paid people before and after, especially given the level of talent Duke usually gets.Oh no a player made money. Better punish the school and all the players that weren't there when the violations happened.
Okay? And?I mean if they paid a dude last year they probably paid people before and after, especially given the level of talent Duke usually gets.
I have no issue with the money itself, but there are some good schools that actually do try and play by the rules. I also have no problem seeing Duke get punished.
Division of course??? School? You really think that Dayton made it to the top 5 with money?? Dayton??No there isn't. There isn't one clean division one school. Does the school cheat directly? Maybe not all of them but boosters do what boosters do everywhere.
The NCAA is going to be so angry that some directional state school is going to get the death penalty.
Well... they will be able too soon as the NCAA is going to allow them to sell appearance fees.I feel like student athletes should be able to capitalize on their skills and star power...
Why are we supposed to be mad at a kid for making the most of the demand for his skill set?
does anyone actually care?
Que?
I seriously don't give a fuck, and this is coming from a Carolina fan.
Whatever they paid him, it wasn't enough.