It's a hard requirement. Has to be.
It's a hard requirement. Has to be.
Reverse Snap side effect would seem to be a possible route with some time jumps to explain things like Spiderman homecoming not addressing it.
But that would require alot of set up and so much of the characters and stories rely on history in terms of backstory and motivations that would no longer exist if the MCU went that way. Like what is magneto without the ww2 backstory?
That leads me to believe some parallel universe shit will go down. They can have their cake and mix characters / worlds and not have to rewrite decades of usable comic material
It'll be this
Wanda will say, "No, more mutants!" and they'll all be born.
In reality, I see their options as Scarlet Witch nonsense, saying mutants were kept secret until now (stupid), and them being an alternate universe that's merged with MCU. None of them are ideal situations. Maybe they'll do something really creative, but I don't really care in the end as long as I get my mutants.
Yeah that's where it would happen if the first thing I said were to take place. It'd be a different take on what she's infamous for in the comics, but it'd be pretty lame to just have mutants suddenly exist because of her. No, thanks.What if Wandavision ends with the accidental creation of mutants...?
Yeah that's where it would happen if the first thing I said were to take place. It'd be a different take on what she's infamous for in the comics, but it'd be pretty lame to just have mutants suddenly exist because of her. No, thanks.
Please have colors that pop, comic book movies look so lifeless.
It removes a key element of their story that limits their growth, though. Basically, it means that every character from X-Men that ever existed was introduced to the world all at once, since the current world of the MCU doesn't possess mutants. That's a lot of moving parts to manage simultaneously, and the longer the movies wait to introduce effectively pre-established characters in this "new world", it runs counter to your desire for maintained backstories, because a lot of those stories would effectively need to be glossed over for runtime concerns.You can't have the story be that the X-Men were always around. That's lame as shit and doesn't make any sense. Even with Cerebro BS.
I also don't want to have the characters in name only. I want their backstories and character dynamics maintained.
So the solution in my view is to have the first MCU X-Men movie be set in an alternate universe set anywhere between the 70's to the mid 90's. Mutants never existed in 'our' world, but the movie would end with them being expelled from that timeline through the actions of the villain (or maybe even a misguided hero), ending up in current day MCU-prime.
It basically solves every single problem. You can still have a Magneto with his concentration camp backstory without him being 90 years old. You can allow the X-Men to have a history and even go back and tell other stories with those characters in their old world if need be. And why does the public hate mutants and not all of the other established heroes? Because they're basically refugees/migrants "who don't belong here!" Which is topical and fits really well in an X-Men story.
Well, the first Strange movie kind of explained it, they fought all their ancient battles and wars on a different plane of reality. It would be an incredibly easy task for one of them to be able to be undetected forever if they wanted.
It's part of why I'm not a fan of the idea.
I have a feeling that this plays a part in it, too (I'll explain why when I get to my own idea further down), but maybe not BREAKING the MCU. Just like the Guardians sort of allowed Thanos to be back-doored into the MCU as being "always there", I feel Doctor Strange is going to be where the next super-major big-bad is going to be back-doored from.
Actually, whether you love him or hate him, this reads pretty close to Bob Chipman's theory of how to introduce the Fantastic Four to the MCU, right down the time displacement and their antiquated notions of American society being confronted with modern reality, but excluding Dr. Doom from the first movie (which I think he's right about).
In Bob We Trust - HOW TO FIX "THE FANTASTIC FOUR" IN THE MCU (PART I)
https://www.patreon.com/moviebob1PART I of II: Bob lays out a hypothetical plan for bringing The Fantastic Four to the Marvel Cinematic Universe - and giving...www.youtube.com
Me too. Say what you want about the Netflix shows, but they were (outside of Iron Fist) REALLY well-cast, and JK Simmons returning as J. Jonah Jameson means that's not even something that you need to take off the table, which is great.
Puppet Master is just a really convenient way to get Ben Grimm and Alicia Masters together and for her to stick around, though.That's hilarious! I enjoy Moviebob's movie pitch ideas, and I'm surprised I haven't seen this one. Gonna watch it now. Lol
I also really like the Netflix shows. I also think they were really well cast (also, except for Iron Fist XD ), and feel like it'd be a shame to waste that talent once they inevitably integrate DareDevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, and Punisher into the MCU. They're probably waiting for some Netflix contractual stuff to be sorted out (I think I remember there being something about how the cast was contracted to work on Netflix seasons of the Marvel shows, but because those seasons are never happening, they can't reprise their roles in Marvel productions featuring those characters? Some bullshit like that?). I'd love to see Mike Coulter, Kristen Ritter, Charlie Cox, Jon Bernthal, and Vincent D'Nofrio back.
EDIT: Watching the Moviebob FF pitch now, and holy shit, it's hilariously close to my pitch! Which means I'm sure Marvel has already thought about it. Lol
EDIT: 2 after watching his take, the only aspect that, unfortunately, wouldn't work now is having Puppet Master be the main antagonist, and his plan. It's too reminiscent of Mysterio's plot in Spider-Man: Far From Home. Not that they couldn't have that be a B or C plot for the Fantastic Four to tackle, but it would be too much of a "retread" so to speak, to be the primary conflict of the film. I think sticking with the heroes wrestling with their fish out of water status and outdated viewpoints is a lot as is (especially if you want to go the Black Panther route, and have it be more topical than you'd expect from a Fantastic Four movie), you could always throw in the Mole Man as the "main" threat to the city that they come together to stop, but the real meat of the movie would be exploring the "modern family" struggle the team now faces, and them slowly growing as characters (but, much like Tony Stark in Iron Man 1), they don't complete that journey in that film, but the stage is set for further growth in future Fantastic Four films. They set aside their various interpersonal conflicts just long enough to stop Mole Man from whatever wackiness he's planning.
I think I'd treat the FF films like Ant-Man films for starters. I know they're Marvel's First Family, and they most certainly deserve respect, and I don't mean treat them like the Ant-Man films in terms of tone/comedy, but in terms of scope/scale. At least for this first outting. They're establishing themselves by handling a smaller threat, setting them up as underdogs in an MCU where the Avengers exist, and each successive film has them rising in prominence (both in universe, and in movie-goer's eyes), until they become a key player in defeating Galactus (kind of like how Ant-Man became a key player in the Thanos saga). This could actually work, as, after the departure of Tony Stark and Steve Rogers, the Avengers themselves can be feeling a little rudderless, as Carol Danvers finds herself struggling with her galactic responsibilities, and therefore can't always be there to bail out the New Avengers every time they encounter a larger than life threat to Earth. The Fantastic Four can step up to the plate over the course of their films.
Pass.You can't have the story be that the X-Men were always around. That's lame as shit and doesn't make any sense. Even with Cerebro BS.
I also don't want to have the characters in name only. I want their backstories and character dynamics maintained.
So the solution in my view is to have the first MCU X-Men movie be set in an alternate universe set anywhere between the 70's to the mid 90's. Mutants never existed in 'our' world, but the movie would end with them being expelled from that timeline through the actions of the villain (or maybe even a misguided hero), ending up in current day MCU-prime.
It basically solves every single problem. You can still have a Magneto with his concentration camp backstory without him being 90 years old. You can allow the X-Men to have a history and even go back and tell other stories with those characters in their old world if need be. And why does the public hate mutants and not all of the other established heroes? Because they're basically refugees/migrants "who don't belong here!" Which is topical and fits really well in an X-Men story.
This. House of X/Powers of X give a pretty cool way of integrating X-Men into the MCU with a Moira-retcon.
They were hiding all this time and boom, mutants reveal themselves and establish a mutant nation on Krakoa.
On the MCU side, use the Winter Soldier program for Magneto. Have him be identified as a potential weapon by his captors in Auschwitz and handed over to Hydra, being brainwashed and put in and out of deep freeze like Bucky was. His relationship with Professor X can be tied to Xavier using his powers to free Magneto from Hydra's brainwashing.
I mean, I think the issue IS that they are doing that already with the Eternals, and arguably that doesn't even work very well, either.I always find it funny people think that "You can't just say they were always there just not involved in previous stories"
When that is exactly what they are doing with the Eternals.
I don't know I think people are just seriously overthinking it.I mean, I think the issue IS that they are doing that already with the Eternals, and arguably that doesn't even work very well, either.
The films aren't the comics, though.I don't know I think people are just seriously overthinking it.
Like in comics Selene and Apocalypse are both Millenia old. Why did no other super team in the past encounter them until X-Factor and the New Mutants encountered them? Because they hadn't done anything to draw attention then.
Why didn't the Eternals show up in Marvel Comics till they did, also being millenia old? Same reason.
Heck why didn't world know about mutants in the comics until Magento attacked the military base? Same reason.
There doesn't need to be some big reason there are suddenly mutants. Because they're always were mutant they just didn't get involved in the stories we were seeing.
Right. They need less explanation in my opinion.
I think the reverse is true. They essentially have to fit an explanation into a singular film, whereas comics can stretch that out for months or years.
Outside Wolvie and Deadpool, the X-Men cast isn't nearly as well known/established as solo characters as they are as parts of X-Men teams, so I doubt Marvel would try and replicate the Phase 1 structure for them. If anything, I could see them try and replicate the comics with a bunch of X-Men associated teams (ex. New Mutants, X-Factor, X-Force, Excalibur, etc) getting their own films and having crossover movies with their own titles (Mutant Massacre, Age of Apocalypse, House of M, Avengers vs. X-Men, etc.).
I'm not talking about recognizability. Like, yeah, way more people knew who Cyclops and Nightcrawler are compared to Thor and Ant-Man prior to their solo movies, but there's not really that much material for you to draw from if you wanted to make solo movies for them.I'd argue XMen have a more recognizable cast than Avengers did (pre mcu).