Lake Mungo really sticks with you. I still think about that scene and get creeped out.I don't mind them if they are put to good use. I'm definitely more into psychological horror and enjoy stuff like hidden figures/ghosts in background shots. When done effectively that sort of stuff seriously gives me chills. I literally just watched Lake Mungo and fuck me man, that movie absolutely creeped me the hell out. I still have goosebumps lol
Well that's because Mike Flanagan is a horror savant and makes excellent media in the genre.The jumpscare in The Haunting of Hill House is one of the few good jumpscares that I didn't see coming
Came to post this
The jumpscare in The Haunting of Hill House is one of the few good jumpscares that I didn't see coming
The bane of modern horror movies is ambiguious monsters or killers with no explained motive. Way too many modern horror films have undeveloped stories and motives and rely on ambiguity to build tension. Often at the end of modern horror films i am now left asking "why?".I'm fine with them if they are used sparingly or with purpose to setup a bigger scare. Movies that just have scary thing jump out at character and thats it are the bane of modern horror movies. That's why I usually tend to prefer movies that have a slow creeping dread associated with them instead of just jump scares.
Although even some of my favorite recent films like Hereditary use a few jump scares in effective places.
This. I like creepy atmospheres and when I actually see a horror film that doesn't rely on jump scares (The Shining comes to mind) I do enjoy them. But jump scares? I just hate them. And as the quoted person said, jump scares are the main reason why I don't watch horror films.I hate them and they're the main reason I don't watch horror movies.
I would take a movie underexplaining something every day of the week to it over explaining. I'm totally fine with movies letting you fill in the gaps.The bane of modern horror movies is ambiguious monsters or killers with no explained motive. Way too many modern horror films have undeveloped stories and motives and rely on ambiguity to build tension. Often at the end of modern horror films i am now left asking "why?".
Granted a reveal can sometimes be clumsy or overexplained, but at least with a reveal there is an attempt to give a complete story. Its way more satisying than a "just because" or "use your imagination" ending.
The build-up to it was immaculate.
This scene in Signs wasnt exactly a jump scare but it was so much better than one. It did scare me but it unnerved me. I felt like at that moment the movie turned on its side and pulled me in further. At that moment the threat became real. We saw enough but not all of it where we could begin to pick the CGI apart.
I love a good, effective jump scare. Something that, when the tension is high, catches you completely by surprise, in a really good way. The best example I can think of comes from The Conjuring.
But when they're overdone, they are absolutely trash. Movies that depend on jump scares for horror aren't good horror movies. That's why the entire Paranormal Activity franchise is trash.
There is in one of the prison bathrooms.I always felt that jump scares are cheap tactics to scare an audience. I love horror that can build fear out of atmosphere, sound, the acting, or dialogue. One of my favorite things about Silent Hill 2 is that there isn't a single jumpscare in the game. It uses darkness, sounds, and its scale of areas to put fear into you.
Came in here to say the exact same thing. My god it was such a good jumpscare.The jumpscare in The Haunting of Hill House is one of the few good jumpscares that I didn't see coming
Pretty much this!I hate them and they're the main reason I don't watch horror movies.
Yep, it's like they took the good ones in 80s movies as the only scary things in them
Rather than well crafted tension, they just stick a jump scare in with a loud noise and call it a day.