OP
OP
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
House to vote on same-sex marriage in an effort to push back against court [UP: Passed house with bipartisan support]
- Thread starter Coyote Starrk
- Start date
Sorry, friend. I'm a bit scattered brained. Let me fix what I meant.
In Windsor, the dissents argue two things: One, that the Court didn't have jurisdiction to decide the case. And, more importantly here, two, that this didn't fall under Due Process. Thomas says:
In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Dissent finds that Due Process and Equal Protection were not violated. Roberts says:
Scalia says:
In City of Borne v. Flores, the Court decided that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is unconstitutional when applied to states. Kennedy says:
This could, possibly, mean that Congress can't codify same-sex marriage or even abortion if the Court decides to continue this reasoning.
Not only that, the Court has said that it decides exactly what "commerce" is, not Congress, if they decide to go that route with both same-sex marriage and abortion rights.
Last edited:
I mean, the material is out there NOW, and yet, I haven't seen anything really thrown their way for hating babies
Stop wishing for the day the right wises up and realizes they're voting in monsters. That they're monsters is the point, and those of you still wanting to get into a war of logic with them has me concerned. Babies, you're better off throwing paper balls at glass hoping it'll break.
Also, leave "Do Something!" Twitter alone. That battle is pointless as well.
Also, leave "Do Something!" Twitter alone. That battle is pointless as well.
Why haven't any Democrat come out and call out the republican Senators when basic human rights laws are voted down and just call them by name as "facist" or "racist". IDGAF what hardcore republican voters may think.
Those people would vote slavery back in if they could, so nobody care about those fools opinions. But we need names and harsh words that can put them on the spotlight, especially with moderate and independent voters who needs to see what type of monsters they keep voting in.
Call McConnell a "facist" when he votes against basic human rights. Call out the Republicans "racist" and everybody in the Democratic senate need to stand behind the person who states this in unison. Harsh words needs to be used against a regime.
This hard counters republican/independent voters talking points of "both sides are the same". The time of "decorum" is over, a line needs to be drawn now.
Those people would vote slavery back in if they could, so nobody care about those fools opinions. But we need names and harsh words that can put them on the spotlight, especially with moderate and independent voters who needs to see what type of monsters they keep voting in.
Call McConnell a "facist" when he votes against basic human rights. Call out the Republicans "racist" and everybody in the Democratic senate need to stand behind the person who states this in unison. Harsh words needs to be used against a regime.
This hard counters republican/independent voters talking points of "both sides are the same". The time of "decorum" is over, a line needs to be drawn now.
I'm not sure this would have the effect you want. Remember how simply calling folks "deplorables" helped sink Hillary?
That's why you don't say it once, because the word would lose meaning as some "catch phrase". You keep saying the same word and you cite clear facts behind those words so that every person who hears this will understand why "racist" or "facist " means in this day and time.
You mention key forefathers who fought against facist and remind them that the Nazis regime is not just in 1938, but also that we are headings in this direction as a country. Use key words where those who has shame will feel shame, those who don't, they were lost regardless. That's how you start reversing what direction our country is going.
OP
OP
This is the part where I remind you that there are Democrats in office who do this. Who routinely call Republics treasonous, nazis, literal "demons".
But they're Black, so not only do they get no attention, the Left will regularly join in with the right in attacking them!
If it sounds like I'm being petty... Yes! Yes I am. I'm bitter as fuck about this because I've noticed this trend for years. Y'all don't actually want what you're asking for, because you'd rally behind them Dems already doing it.
The key word is "unison", both Black, White, Hispanic...etc. All these old head "decorum " democrats is going to get us pushed into a facist regime in 20 years. Hate talking talking politics in Kansas with white moderate democrats or independent voters because like you said, I get the "crazy/angry black man" label. Even when I am citing sources with those words and nobody wants to listen to the black guy because he uses harsh words such as racist or facist. If I didn't use harsh words, you wouldn't listen to me anyway. Pisses me off all the time...
I see you.
I really do.
Shit pisses me off.
There are Black Dems up and down the party who STAY lighting Republicans up. STAY on their asses.
Shit, not even Justin the party! Shout out to Professor Bridges!
I'm actually looking forward to Republicans openly opposing something that will protect interracial marriage. Wear your shit on your sleeve so people can see what type of person you are.
Edit: I didn't realize this had already passed, and now I want these motherfuckers strung out to dry.
House passes bill to codify gay marriage over Republican objections led by Ohio’s Jim Jordan
Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio led opposition on the House of Representatives floor.
www.cleveland.com
Also, the highly concerned Susan Collins helped introduce the bill.
Senators Baldwin, Feinstein, Collins Introduce Bipartisan Respect for Marriage Act | U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin
WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Diane Feinstein (D-CA), and Susan Collins...
www.baldwin.senate.gov
Murkowski is also on board.
Last edited:
These morons only changing their voting when it directly affects them (I.e a family member comes out as gay) really does show how insincere they are, and how lacking in basic human empathy they are as well. Can't remotely empathise or relate to someone else unless it somehow affects them and their families. The Conservative mindset in a nutshell.
In a perfect world they would be asked why they hate interracial marriage on tv
Exactly. I don't know if that report about the senator who changed his mind on equal marriage after his son came out was supposed to be some kind of feel good story, but it actually made me sick.
These people are absolutely incapable of any kind of empathy, and they know their actions have the potential to ruin people's lives but they just don't care as long as their prospects in politics are good.
There are multiple websites that do this, including Congress' website.