They have to choose between voting for and losing support or voting against and losing funding.Disaster?
The only question is whether we will see more than 2 dozen voting for.
sounds like fun for us.They have to choose between voting for and losing support or voting against and losing funding.
they cant vote with their conscience when they don't believe in science
The Caning of Charles Sumner, or the Brooks–Sumner Affair, occurred on May 22, 1856, in the United States Senate chamber, when Representative Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina, used a walking cane to attack Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Republican from Massachusetts, in retaliation for a speech given by Sumner two days earlier in which he fiercely criticized slaveholders, including a relative of Brooks.
It's just a stock phrase used when a party withholds the whip, I wouldn't read too much into it.Not sure if clever wording or moral judgment on the Republican House reps lol
So many Republicans to be home sick with Covid.Lots of Rs gonna be sweating between not being on the record against impeachment for the sake of fundraising but also not wanting to make their constituents mad. Should be a fun time!
^^^^ It's this. Leadership is just saying they aren't going to force the ones in more moderate/suburb districts to go down with S.S. Trump*Vote how you think does the least damage to your re-election chances.*
Disaster?
The only question is whether we will see more than 2 dozen voting for.
Wow, what a fascinating story.House Whip use to mean something different back in the day
Caning of Charles Sumner - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A vote for Trump may tank their fundraising efforts.A vote against Trump will tank their re-election hopes, in their minds. Let's see what is more important to them.
couldn't happen to a better group of traitorsA vote for Trump may tank their fundraising efforts.
They're stuck between a rock and a hard place.