-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
delete the LocalCacheDX12 folder and verify. it will do the start up again when you launch
Built in frame limiter is trash. Use RTSS instead. Solid performance so far, but I am running a 2080ti.
As soon as you get past the kid Aloy section and into the open world its stutter-ville for me.
3700x / RTX2080
3700x / RTX2080
HZD supports Steam Input support, so use whatever the hell controllers and control schemes you like.
The default config and setup however seems pretty poor imo, but that's the good thing with Steam Input where you can do what you want.
No descriptors for actions, instead just compatible buttons suggests this isn't going to work as well as hoped.
I'll investigate how flexible this is as I haven't seen a Steam Input supported game not using actions.
Setting up as Mouse+Gamepad for now, and will test it out
The default config and setup however seems pretty poor imo, but that's the good thing with Steam Input where you can do what you want.
No descriptors for actions, instead just compatible buttons suggests this isn't going to work as well as hoped.
I'll investigate how flexible this is as I haven't seen a Steam Input supported game not using actions.
Setting up as Mouse+Gamepad for now, and will test it out
is your PC underwater? Those clocks are great on the RTX 2080 Ti! Also very surprised you are getting full clocks on the 3900x - this game never touched mine enough to make it hit max frequency really too often.They aren't supposed to be there
the benchmark scene is one of the easier to run locations in the game, so you will most likely be averaging much lower
I had the same thing happen to me too. It has been the only crash so far though.
Dunno about you guys - but for me, in game vsync absolutely ruins performance. On my modest setup ( 2600 rtx + i5 9400 ) the benchmark ran horribly on 'prefer quality' settings. Pure stutter fest. However, disabling in-game vsync and frame limiter, and turning on vsync in the driver settings, the benchmark ran right through from beginning to end, buttery smooth. The benchmark results say it dropped down to 25fps, but to my eyes, I didn't see a single hitch.
Its weird. This isn't the first time ive seen a game perform crap when using in-game vsync over driver vsync. But yeah - be keen to hear if any of you notice a difference between the two in this game.
Its weird. This isn't the first time ive seen a game perform crap when using in-game vsync over driver vsync. But yeah - be keen to hear if any of you notice a difference between the two in this game.
The one thing to be careful with with driver vsync, is that it should be double buffered - so you need a very nice overhead on your GPU there.
71 fps average on the benchmark for me at 3840x1600 ultrawide using DF's optimized settings. Not as bad as I was expecting. I'll still wait for some patches and probably my new build before replaying. CPU just can't keep up nowadays.
They're in DF's video and someone posted a screenshot of them in the DF thread.
Scary times for me when i see the Devs make their own configs for the steam controller.
hmmmm when you choose a different settings other than the devs the steam controller still works ingame? I tried using base steam control settings with mouse and the game doesn't respond to these settings.HZD supports Steam Input support, so use whatever the hell controllers and control schemes you like.
The default config and setup however seems pretty poor imo, but that's the good thing with Steam Input where you can do what you want.
No descriptors for actions, instead just compatible buttons suggests this isn't going to work as well as hoped.
I'll investigate how flexible this is as I haven't seen a Steam Input supported game not using actions.
Setting up as Mouse+Gamepad for now, and will test it out
Are you referring to the shader compilation process? Because that's what it's doing then. Though I don't know if shader compilation is CPU based.
Yeah, I finally found the courage to do it.
Pressing the "take screenshot button" is sometimes spinning the CPU up...
Safest bet is to check the manual of your motherboard and verify if the GPU is plugged into a PCIe 3.0/4.0 x16 slot. You should be able to find the bus info in your GPU utility software as well (Nvidia Control Panel > Help > System Information for NV, not sure about AMD).
looks like that matches then, so i assume good? also, is there a concerning difference between 3.0 vs 4.0?
Install GPU Z, press the question mark, start the render test...
That's the thing. I had plenty of overhead. When using the in-game vsync, both my GPU and CPU were on 75% or less, and yet the framerate was well below 50 most of the time. With driver vsync on, the GPU got up to 85% in places, but the framerate didn't suffer for it.
I might run it at a locked 50hz to give me a bit more wiggle room for the inevitable in-game sections that are heavier than the benchmark. We'll see how it goes.
Side note: the benchmark is not a good advert for the game at all. Quite frankly - it looks shit. Even on max settings.
Looking good!
looks like that matches then, so i assume good? also, is there a concerning difference between 3.0 vs 4.0?
As for PCIe 4.0: Not for a 2080 Ti, no. Was just mentioning it just in case.
Performance has been buttery smooth on my end, but I'm getting crazy model glitches. Something's bugged with the LOD system as walkers explode the second they walk a few feet away. Played for 30 minutes, no crashes so far.
Ok, there's definitely a memory leak. 16GB of RAM and when i exited the game i noticed the game was still running (under the Steam process) and RAM usage was 80% and increasing.
Definitely doublecheck that the game isn't still running and leaking memory after you exit it. Other than that, i get around 50fps average up to the point where i start playing as adult Aloy, at 1440p using a 1070/i7 4770k and the Alex optimized settings above.
Definitely doublecheck that the game isn't still running and leaking memory after you exit it. Other than that, i get around 50fps average up to the point where i start playing as adult Aloy, at 1440p using a 1070/i7 4770k and the Alex optimized settings above.
I usually don't have any overhead as I play 4k max settings, but BlurBusters says to enable driver vsync to make Gsync work properly. So now I'm confused on what to do.
Confirmed, no simultaneous KB/M with Gamepad. Very disappointing, but I suppose I should have guessed as much looking at the messy implementation. I'll toy around with it a bit more but guessing mouse-like joystick will be preferred once tweaked, or worst case, map the whole controller to M&KB.
This is a bit of a first from my experience, of a game with some form of Steam Input support, but somehow, bad support!
The game wouldn't stop running in the background after quitting for nearly 5 minutes, had to kill it in Task Manager. I was tempted to double-dip (I got over halfway through Death Stranding on PS4 and I've enjoyed catching up & passing that mark on PC, so I was expecting to do the same here) but I don't feel like I'd enjoy playing this in its current state.
Refunding and saving the cash for Marvel's Avengers if I enjoy the open beta, I think.
Refunding and saving the cash for Marvel's Avengers if I enjoy the open beta, I think.
I'd want to know the reasons, too, although there are only two games I know of that do it to these extreme extents: CODMW and HZD – and it's totally annoying. I don't really buy the "performance reason". If it would be necessary to greatly improve performance I guess every game would do that? I'm not sure, hence I'd like to learn more about this. Most games I play run just fine and perform great without the need to compile shaders for minutes.