"I'm not a pedophile, but if I was, Macaulay Culkin's the first kid I'm fucking. I'll tell you that right now."
I haven't seen it yet but it's hard to find any comedy that isn't offensive to someone. Where do we draw the line?
Im amazed they didn't bundle this with his last 2 specials. I felt this was the perfect end to what those last two started on. Outrage culture, #meetoo and other topics. This special is the hembodiment of what he started those specials on that comedy should be a place for "reckless talk" unbound to moderation as long as it gets a laugh. And the crowd was laughing.
IMO it wasn't as funny as any of his other specials nor did he say a lot new but I was entertained. It reminds me a lot of Aziz's last special which I found to be just Aziz trying a Bird Revelation approach but he isn't as good at crowd work as Chappelle and apart from an interesting directing type by Spike Jonze and there conveniently being a child in the front row for Aziz to riff on. He didn't have many jokes.
As for Chappelle, his reckless talk approach is what is getting him in trouble. He knows he's wrong. Seriously. He says not to watch Leaving Neverland because "it's gross" not because it's wrong but just because it is ruining one of his idols. It's no different than his superhero bit of "He rapes but he saves" to illustrate his relationship with Billl Cosby. Sadly, he isn't ready to accept Jackson's fall. He looked up to him more than Cosby. He loves Prince and Jackson.
Yet, the Jackson and Transgender approach isn't anything new from me. I know a shit ton of black people with his ideology. If you're part of my parents generation or older, transgenerism and genderfluidity is fucking weird to them. I get it. But I'm also a twenty-five years old dude. Transgenderism hasn't really been part of the mainstream until 2010-2013 area. Up until then, Man In A Dress or Women Being Man was a comedic set up from Tyler Perry's Madea, Big Mama's House or Motocrosssed. And those were all 2000 films. Dave has lived 86% of his life with that topic being a sure way to get laughs. I'm not saying he should get a pass. But, if you think he's going to switch his view overnight, I wouldn't bet on that. Either one of his kids is going to have to transition or a slow burn will have to occur. For me to see him flip his position on that. But while he is punching down, he isn't advocating for a stagnation in progress. He just finds it funny to him. It's reckless talk.
And while I don't agree with 100% of what he says.( The car analogy for one. And the idea that you can't offend the alphabet people being a staple of Hollywood) I'm okay with him having his reckless talk because at the end of the day, he's a comedian. Not to downplay celebrity influence, but some people have compared his talk to having as much weight as if a politician said it. But Dave's a comedian. Comedians don't influence shit. As Hasan Minhaj said At the height of Jon Stewart's show, Bush won twice.
I'd be fine if this was his last special for a while. He's run out of steam on these topics. It didn't feel as intimate as Bird Revelation or as compact as the others. He just needs to step away now and make some more quality jokes. This felt like he was 90% whiffing it and improvising.
I haven't seen it yet but it's hard to find any comedy that isn't offensive to someone. Where do we draw the line?
Hate to bring up the audience once again but aren't they partially to blame? They were dying laughing. I just don't think society is there yet where they won't laugh at that. I don't know much about Atlanta but isn't it a progressive bed? I believe the epilogue was in NY. I don't think him not doing the jokes will solve the problem if society is still ok with laughing at it. One could maybe argue they are not laughing at the jokes but just laughing because it's Dave being Dave. I still think we are a good decade away before the audience boo's Dave for this stuff. I'm sure he gets negative reactions at some venues (as mentioned in the epilogue) but then he ends that encounter in what I call Chappelle defiance and the crowd erupted with laughs, when I was expecting half boos.
Or maybe it's just because Dave is the exception to the rule for some people. Or maybe it's just careful editing to only show the jokes that landed idk.
Lets draw the line at telling children they should feel honored for being raped by famous people.I haven't seen it yet but it's hard to find any comedy that isn't offensive to someone. Where do we draw the line?
Well obviously, as this thread demonstrates, plenty of people are cool with mocking and dehumanizing trans people for the sake of a laugh. So I guess the line falls short of that for some folks.I haven't seen it yet but it's hard to find any comedy that isn't offensive to someone. Where do we draw the line?
Was there anything more to this joke? If not, he's fallen far from that Elizabeth Smart joke.
Which still lands kinda funky but had some redeeming qualities (talking about victims of color and their media representation).
Yet, the Jackson and Transgender approach isn't anything new from me. I know a shit ton of black people with his ideology. If you're part of my parents generation or older, transgenerism and genderfluidity is fucking weird to them. I get it. But I'm also a twenty-five years old dude. Transgenderism hasn't really been part of the mainstream until 2010-2013 area. Up until then, Man In A Dress or Women Being Man was a comedic set up from Tyler Perry's Madea, Big Mama's House or Motocrosssed. And those were all 2000 films. Dave has lived 86% of his life with that topic being a sure way to get laughs. I'm not saying he should get a pass. But, if you think he's going to switch his view overnight, I wouldn't bet on that. Either one of his kids is going to have to transition or a slow burn will have to occur. For me to see him flip his position on that. But while he is punching down, he isn't advocating for a stagnation in progress. He just finds it funny to him. It's reckless talk.
And while I don't agree with 100% of what he says.( The car analogy for one. And the idea that you can't offend the alphabet people being a staple of Hollywood) I'm okay with him having his reckless talk because at the end of the day, he's a comedian. Not to downplay celebrity influence, but some people have compared his talk to having as much weight as if a politician said it. But Dave's a comedian. Comedians don't influence shit. As Hasan Minhaj said At the height of Jon Stewart's show, Bush won twice.
Hate to bring up the audience once again but aren't they partially to blame? They were dying laughing. I just don't think society is there yet where they won't laugh at that. I don't know much about Atlanta but isn't it a progressive bed? I believe the epilogue was in NY. I don't think him not doing the jokes will solve the problem if society is still ok with laughing at it. One could maybe argue they are not laughing at the jokes but just laughing because it's Dave being Dave. I still think we are a good decade away before the audience boo's Dave for this stuff. I'm sure he gets negative reactions at some venues (as mentioned in the epilogue) but then he ends that encounter in what I call Chappelle defiance and the crowd erupted with laughs, when I was expecting half boos.
Or maybe it's just because Dave is the exception to the rule for some people. Or maybe it's just careful editing to only show the jokes that landed idk.
I mean, but does anybody really believe he feels that way? I mean it's a joke and it's funny because it's absurd. That's what most of the jokes offending people were.Lets draw the line at telling children they should feel honored for being raped by famous people.
Any comic can do stupid and absurd. That's not been Dave's style. And doing moronic tone deaf comedy followed immediately by a QA in which he says he was just kidding around isn't brave. Or smart. All he did was repeat stupid shit morons on the internet have been saying since the HBO doc released.I mean, but does anybody really believe he feels that way? I mean it's a joke and it's funny because it's absurd. That's what most of the jokes offending people were.
I mean, I mean.I mean, but does anybody really believe he feels that way? I mean it's a joke and it's funny because it's absurd. That's what most of the jokes offending people were.
That's part of the problem, though. He demands that people challenge him and that he is allowed to challenge whatever limit he wants, but then he keeps making it clear that he's actually terrified of being challenged.Chapelle isn't just a comedian telling jokes, he's got a voice and a pedestal and he definitely knows it here. His goal, outside of telling jokes, is challenging the "Cancel Culture" and #MeTooMovement. He's basically daring people to "cancel" him next. Maybe he feels he's got enough money to not care anymore? He pretty much admits he doesn't fit into the current climate anymore.
What did you think of the transphobiaI didn't even realize he had another special up on Netflix! I think with was even better than the last two.
Was there anything more to this joke? If not, he's fallen far from that Elizabeth Smart joke.
Which still lands kinda funky but had some redeeming qualities (talking about victims of color and their media representation).
See on the streets I'm what's known as a victim blamer... "Dave, MJ molested some kids!" "Oh? Well what were those kids wearing?"
Thats shock value. Sure it's strong but that's a big part of observation comedy (or comedy as a whole), especially his take. I can't think of a group of people he hasn't mocked harshly honestly. Personally I found the special really great.
One of the founding rules of comedy is that you don't make fun of people less privileged than you. Punching down is cheap and easy and it makes you an asshole.
The solution is just "don't punch down". It's really not hard.
"The customer is always right" is one of the founding rules of retail.
A white person doing blackface to mock black people would have shock value in a comedy skit. You wouldn't advocate for or defend that though.Thats shock value. Sure it's strong but that's a big part of observation comedy (or comedy as a whole), especially his take. I can't think of a group of people he hasn't mocked harshly honestly. Personally I found the special really great.
Is it really shocking if he's had the same take for years now?Thats shock value. Sure it's strong but that's a big part of observation comedy (or comedy as a whole), especially his take. I can't think of a group of people he hasn't mocked harshly honestly. Personally I found the special really great.
A white person doing blackface to mock black people would have shock value in a comedy skit. You wouldn't advocate for or defend that though.
Comedy has lines in the sand as much as everything else, even if it's largely given more lenience in places.
The argument simply being 'it's comedy' or 'it's supposed to be offensive' doesn't just immediately absolve things.
Is it really shocking if he's had the same take for years now?
Are you trying to argue in favor of using comedy to beat up on people who are already suffering because customers can be dickheads sometimes?
Thats shock value. Sure it's strong but that's a big part of observation comedy (or comedy as a whole), especially his take. I can't think of a group of people he hasn't mocked harshly honestly. Personally I found the special really great.
"It's just a joke, bro"
I'm arguing you quoting 'the founding rules of comedy" is nonsense. If you dont feel marginalized groups should be mocked you can say just that, no need to couch it in constitutional language. There are no rules, comedians can punch in any direction they choose if it gets a laugh.
It's insult comedy. Some people can take that and laugh and I can appreciate that some cannot. Literally any stand up has mocked someone or something. That's pretty much the point. If all of a sudden you're upset at this one because it made fun of trans people, maybe think of all the other standups you watched that made fun of other races/genders/ or even specific individuals. They are in good jest and people live their day.
It's insult comedy. Some people can take that and laugh and I can appreciate that some cannot. Literally any stand up has mocked someone or something. That's pretty much the point. If all of a sudden you're upset at this one because it made fun of trans people, maybe think of all the other standups you watched that made fun of other races/genders/ or even specific individuals. They are in good jest and people live their day.
Sarah Silverman was blasted and apologised for it recently, saying she regrets it. So it's not really the best example of comedy having no lines.Wait... I think he literally has done that. Also Sarah Silverman has. His comedy is trademark offensive and if you can't see the humor in that, I can appreciate it's just not for you. Context does mean a lot, for example David Cooke famously making a 9/11 joke too soon. Personally, I found his standup special really well done. That's all I'm saying.
Perhaps you can tell me where the humour is in a white person putting on blackface to mock black people."I don't stand by the blackface sketch," she told GQ last year. "I'm horrified by it, and I can't erase it. I can only be changed by it and move on."
It's insult comedy. Some people can take that and laugh and I can appreciate that some cannot. Literally any stand up has mocked someone or something. That's pretty much the point. If all of a sudden you're upset at this one because it made fun of trans people, maybe think of all the other standups you watched that made fun of other races/genders/ or even specific individuals. They are in good jest and people live their day.
Why do they insist on making Arnold's role comedic in these fucking movies? Jesus.
"You seem upset" just smacks of more T3 and Genisys style humor. Ugh.
And that made it into the fucking TRAILER. I can only assume the movie itself will be even worse.
I definitely preferred the teaser more than this. Now I'm just worried this will be another Genisys.
I do like Sarah Connor though, I haven't seen anything from her I haven't liked yet.
Was there anything more to this joke? If not, he's fallen far from that Elizabeth Smart joke.
Which still lands kinda funky but had some redeeming qualities (talking about victims of color and their media representation).
There is a difference between discussing what Chappelle said and just doing weak drivebys where shitty people insist that anyone upset just need to have the rules of comedy explained to them.what exactly is the track? We really need a mod/threadmarks post on what is allowed to be posted in this thread and what is not. From the banned trail, it seems anyone who doesn't acknowledge the special contains transphobia will be banned. Is the only point of this thread to talk about how Dave Chappelle is wrong?
what exactly is the track? We really need a mod/threadmarks post on what is allowed to be posted in this thread and what is not. From the banned trail, it seems anyone who doesn't acknowledge the special contains transphobia will be banned. Is the only point of this thread to talk about how Dave Chappelle is wrong?