I'm extremely glad the tide of public opinion has turned on Jackson. But there was really no new information in that doc. So all this "growing" many former defenders have made is largely bullshit. It's just personal social PR.
I was a fan of Jackson as a kid. Not like I had posters on the wall or anything, but I bought and listened to the cassettes, rented the Moonwalker VHS a few times, played the Sega game, really liked that Simpsons episode, remember watching the live concert on HBO in '92 (?), etc etc.
By the time I was old enough to understand what the allegations actually entailed, or became old enough to understand that a lack of criminal conviction didn't equal innocence, Jackson was no longer relevant to me. I was busy discovering Nine Inch Nails or whatever.
For over a decade after that, all Jackson meant to me had to do with a handful of nostalgic songs and music videos. I had no impetus to consider him as a person or all the controversy around him. So, I'm thankful for the publicity leading up to the release of the doc getting my attention.
HOWEVER... I was never a defender, though, it just wasn't on my radar. I don't even understand how anyone could look at all the facts that have been available for all these years and still fucking buy that he was some sort of impossible innocent childlike being. Yeah, I heard he "he never had a childhood" etc explanations for his behavior... and didn't question it...when I was a damn child. Like you said, the facts aren't really new. So, I don't really understand how someone that claims to have
really known the facts beforehand could be turned around by the doc.