It's actually better that it was spoiled. Now you don't have to watch this trash.
Yea, this is where I'm at.
People were quoting the Caulkin line with genuine concern.
Stand up comedians in general are mentally deranged and think of the most fucked up shit. The jokes they tell each other must be beyond offensive.
Not remotely funny.
Okay, people can be good comedians and not be good people who should be platformed.
That makes it even worse if he doesn't believe it himself (which I really don't see any reason to believe is the case, but either way). Because whether he believes it or not, the damage this type of stuff does, dismissing accounts if sexual sbuse and then going on to say even if it did happen they "must have liked it" and all that is the same regardless because whether he believes it or not just throwing that stuff out there anyway is exactly the type of stuff people use to attack accusers, believing that they must just be in it for the money and stuff because they find it do hard to believe they were abused for the same "jokes" get makes here, and that's exactly the type of stuff that makes it so hard for victims to come forward in the first place, because they know they have to deal with stuff like that if they do. So if he doesn't even believe it himself, that would make it that much worse, doing that damage for something he doesn't even believe himself, but just doing it anyway.
Wait, we now hate dave Chapelle?
So what? They've also got a bunch of great stuff there about climate change, gun control, social justice, the environment etc.
What joke does that lead into exactly and how does that defend him joking about them being lists and how even if it were true it must be the "best day of their lives" exactly? How does whatever joke it leads into necessitate making those kinda vile jokes that do real damage to victims of sexual abuse and nake it that much harder for them to come forward, however it was intended?
But they disagree with my world view so they must be deplatformed!
I mean, look at it this way: If you were a part of a group he said some bad shit about, you'd be pretty pissed, right? Or, if you were a friend of someone who was, you'd probably still be pissed because you love and support your friend. Now, in life we are all going to end up supporting things that are shady or promote bad things, you might use a Nestle product or shop at Walmart, this stuff is inevitable in most cases. In this instance, it's a product that nobody is really forced to take part in, it offers little tangible benefit beyond entertainment, so in a case like this it's much easier to take a stand to not support it because it isn't a necessity.
Wait, did I say someone was making me watch something? Can you elaborate on your logic, because what I'm seeing is "don't criticize Netflix" which is a fairly absurd position.
Can you explain how not being a bigot is a "worldview" and why anyone would disagree with that? Is your stance that people can hold any view and as long as that is their opinion then it's above reproach?
