That doesn't sound right to me but I only speak Spanish as a second language.
Spanish is my native language and it's weird AF.
Again, whoever else who wants to use it is fine by me.
That doesn't sound right to me but I only speak Spanish as a second language.
From your post, you clearly DON'T understand the issue.
How can a group have certain skin features when the group contains people with a complete spectrum of mixes from Europe, Africa, and the Americas?
There are Hispanics as pale as the paleest white person and also Hispanics with extremely dark complexions. What skin features?
Why are you using english phonems to explain spanish language? In any case it would be /latineks/ which still sound weird for me.
I am more partial of just using the femenine plural for generalisms (which is also possible) and/or adding both "latinas y latinos" (which can be shortened with the @).
That doesn't sound right to me but I only speak Spanish as a second language.
"Brazilians are Latinos" implies all. Some would be correct.
Latin@ was in use long before Latinx. It's purpose was to include everyone on the gender spectrum. Latinx came out of American academia and is a word that uses English convention to craft a new Spanish term.
The intent of the term is fine. It's just something that is used to punch down (as we've seen in this very thread) as well as a term that is used by people to self identify.
The one gap may be gender non confirming (outside the spectrum)
Gendered language is
Also latin@ does not encompass gender neutral or non-binary people.
You see... If a person with European ancestry moves to latin america they become latinos.
If an Asian does the same they are forever Asian.
(I'm not arguing a side, just trying to illustrate the complexities of race and identity)
Latinx is cultural imperialism by the usual suspect, the USA.
Instead of despoiling the soil of Latin America with blood spilled by right-wing death squads and American-bought arms, now the liberals of America attempt to rewrite someone else's language to conform to their own ivory tower ideals to be "morally correct."
Truly the arrogance of America knows no bounds.
Subset of Latinos I believe. Chicano is specifically Mexican-American (or American-Mexican if you prefer).
Yeah I agree. People are going to use what makes them happy and you can't stop the evolution of language.Spanish is my native language and it's weird AF.
Again, whoever else who wants to use it is fine by me.
Yeah I agree. People are going to use what makes them happy and you can't stop the evolution of language.
I don't know him, so I don't know how he identifies.
That depends on how you are using Latino. In this thread (and how most of North America uses it) it seems to be used as a race descriptor. In that case, probably not.
As an aside, I just wanted to say thanks to Boiled Goose and RobertoSAGuedes for jumping in with aggressive, but fair, questioning. Lively debate is much more interesting than people trying to yell over each other. Appreciate the differing PoVs.
As an aside, I just wanted to say thanks to Boiled Goose and RobertoSAGuedes for jumping in with aggressive, but fair, questioning. Lively debate is much more interesting than people trying to yell over each other. Appreciate the differing PoVs.
We do , I made it at the beginning of the year I think.Why don't we have a Spanish / Latino thread already?
Hagámoslo!
He identifies as Peruvian and Peruvians are latinos based on the definition of being part of Latin America.
So how would you describe the latin "race" then? Can a black person be latino? What about a pure indigenous person like a quechua or aymara or pure European/white person? Latin America is EXTREMELY diverse.
He identifies as Peruvian and Peruvians are latinos based on the definition of being part of Latin America.
So how would you describe the latin "race" then? Can a black person be latino? What about a pure indigenous person like a quechua or aymara or pure European/white person? Latin America is EXTREMELY diverse.
Ok , voy a ver si lo consigo :p
do spanish people call themselves hispanic? don't remember ever hearing that. as a european that has always felt like an america thing.
Ok , voy a ver si lo consigo :p
Found it: https://www.resetera.com/threads/spanish-speaking-thread.101757/
Well it's already been done: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_AsiaI prefer to say that I'm Mexican. We all have different cultures, dialects, etc. You wouldn't lump Indian and Pakistani people together just because they are next to each other.
You're thinking Ispano.
fuck outta here
Latinx is cultural imperialism by the usual suspect, the USA.
Instead of despoiling the soil of Latin America with blood spilled by right-wing death squads and American-bought arms, now the liberals of America attempt to rewrite someone else's language to conform to their own ivory tower ideals to be "morally correct."
Truly the arrogance of America knows no bounds.
But if you insist on using that garbage word, x in Spanish is pronounced equis. So the least you could do is say/write it as latinequis.
The Guyanese, Surinamese and French Guyanese are not latino! Latino's descended from countries with where they speak a language with a primarily latin root (Spanish AND Portugese).Latino = Anyone born in Latin America. Language does not matter.
¿No tenemos terminaciones femenina y masculina plara evitar estas cosas? Latino o latins según sea el caso, no es tan complicado.
The Guyanese, Surinamese and French Guyanese are not latino! Latino's descended from countries with where they speak a language with a primarily latin root (Spanish AND Portugese).
French is also a Latin language. But that's why the definition of Latin America is blurry.The Guyanese, Surinamese and French Guyanese are not latino! Latino's descended from countries with where they speak a language with a primarily latin root (Spanish AND Portugese).
I think it's because some groups are mixed-sex so using latinx instead of latinos is supposed to acknowledge this fact.¿No tenemos terminaciones femenina y masculina plara evitar estas cosas? Latino o latins según sea el caso, no es tan complicado.
Latinx is used to include non-binary people. Using only Latino/Latina is a form of gatekeeping people who are part of our community. It's definitely not about upper class Americans whatsoever.
100% de acuerdo. I'm in one of the most liberal places in the US and even here I have to deal with ignorant people who don't know Puerto Rico is a part of the US or that we're American citizens.Latinx is cultural imperialism by the usual suspect, the USA.
Instead of despoiling the soil of Latin America with blood spilled by right-wing death squads and American-bought arms, now the liberals of America attempt to rewrite someone else's language to conform to their own ivory tower ideals to be "morally correct."
Truly the arrogance of America knows no bounds.
Like I said, I'm not here to convince you. Let's just agree to disagree. No need to be aggressive about this. As you've said, the debate is very much recent, and I just believe that it makes sense to define Latinx as a race. You're free to believe it's just an ethnicity. And I understand why you do.
Only because we're writing in English here. And I disagree it's only Spanish language. Sure, it's part of it. But I'm Brazilian, and the Latinx community includes people from all Latin American countries.
Sure, we can agree that "some" makes more sense. However, I've seen non-binary people embracing the term "Latinx" more often, as it's easier to speak than "Latin@." Maybe some have used it to punch down, but I'm part of various Latinx groups that use it in a very positive way. I think the tide is changing on that.
¿No tenemos terminaciones femenina y masculina plara evitar estas cosas? Latino o latina según sea el caso, no es tan complicado.
Are you serious lol
x is pronounced [ks]. Do you say 'Hoy tengo un e-equis-amen de matemáticas?'