Aren't the Clintons rich?
That would be my take, she scared for her moolah.
yeah, that's why they're asking her "IF" Sanders wins the nomination.
yeah, that's why they're asking her "IF" Sanders wins the nomination.
Yeah my mistakeI didn't say it's bad to have experience
I was just saying that poster was wrong in saying that "they're all career politicians"
imo at least one term in government should be a pre-req for holding the highest office in the land.
How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately "elevated" Donald Trump with its "pied piper" strategy
An email released by WikiLeaks shows how the Democratic Party purposefully "elevated" Trump to "leader of the pack"www.salon.com
She could have said she would endorse anyone that wins the mom, which is the standard response. The fact she didn't tells you where her heads at.Saying she would endorse him this early, even as a hypothetical, is in itself an endorsement. Which shes clearly trying to avoid.
It's almost like she has the worst political instincts of anyone that has ever existed.
lol do you think that hillary supporters care about trans people? She had kinder words for transphobes than for Bernie SandersThis actually reminds me, anyone who dislikes Bernie supporters, please avoid using Bernie bros instead as I've seen a sizeable amount of trans women who support him whose dysphoria is triggered when they get lumped in as Bernie Bros
Saying she would endorse him this early, even as a hypothetical, is in itself an endorsement. Which shes clearly trying to avoid.
Was she right when she repeatedly praised a war criminal who was directly involved with the deaths of thousands in Cambodia and South America?
Was she also right when she said transphobic shit after transphobic shit?
How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately "elevated" Donald Trump with its "pied piper" strategy
An email released by WikiLeaks shows how the Democratic Party purposefully "elevated" Trump to "leader of the pack"www.salon.com
Obama boys is significantly more racist, but the idea is the same!Its also wise to once again remember that the "Bernie bro" term is literally a copy-paste from a previous Hillary stunt:
Wow this is truly horrifying her campaign actually actively and consciously helped Donald Trump get to where he is.
Fair point, I got confused about when she actually became a politician as she became politically active before that. So yeah I guess she counts as a non career politicianConsidering most people don't seem to understand what the DNC actually does, this shouldn't surprise you.
TIL 10 years is an entire career.
lol do you think that hillary supporters care about trans people? She had kinder words for transphobes than for Bernie Sanders
The crime bill had good and bad sides, that's how omnibus legislation works. Also I'm not sure how a Crime Reform Bill is unrelated to a bill that stiffened criminal penalties for domestic abuse and increased funding towards prosecuting and investigating domestic abuse crimes.
My point is, Bernie attacks people who voted for the Crime Bill when he himself voted for it. He did it with Clinton and now he's doing it with Biden. Yes, he stated objections to elements of it, but so did many members of Congress that voted for it. It ended up being a disaster for people of color—particularly the black community—but elements of it were objectively good.
lol do you think that hillary supporters care about trans people? She had kinder words for transphobes than for Bernie Sanders
Bernie is going to force a brokered convention and due to his non-aggression pact with Warren they will combine their delegate votes to secure one of them being the primary winner and the other the VP unless they agree not take the VP position for another cabinet post.Reminder that "Clinton lost to Trump" isn't as effective of an insult as you think it is when your candidate got demolished by Clinton and is currently losing to the ghost of Joe Biden.
Why did the GOP fear her so much if she was so clearly a bad politician?
It's absolutely accurate, but even Clinton herself thinks it hurt her and her campaign. The only people who agreed with her were people who already thought that way; it pushed at least some undecided voters to vote for Trump instead, and Trump supporters were largely uninsulted by it and instead reappropriated it into something positive (in their eyes).Are you suggesting that deplorable's comment wasn't proven to be 100% accurate?
She could have said she would endorse anyone that wins the mom, which is the standard response. The fact she didn't tells you where her heads at.
you guys think you're playing 4D chess when you're literally failing at elementary school level reading comprehension
Can't even commit to campaign for him if he's the nominee when he went across the country campaigning for her after she beat him in 2016?!?!
I know plenty of centrists that are nice to trans people, and other marginalised groups, in their personal life and don't see the irony in them supporting people and policies that actively hurt those groups. So I imagine some at least would care enough to change their words, but that's about all the assistance that can be expected from themlol do you think that hillary supporters care about trans people? She had kinder words for transphobes than for Bernie Sanders
What are you talking about? How are you judging the level of "fear" the GOP had?
We are literally still in a competition within the party and she knows her endorsement carries weight whether negative or positive.
There is only one true Bernie "Bro," but thankfully he posts with the power of 100,000 men.
Generic endorsement doesn't carry weight. Do you think it'd even be news worthy if she said she said she would support any Dem politician that would wins the nom?We are literally still in a competition within the party and she knows her endorsement carries weight whether negative or positive.
We are literally still in a competition within the party and she knows her endorsement carries weight whether negative or positive.
We are literally still in a competition within the party and she knows her endorsement carries weight whether negative or positive.
It would have been nice if she hadn't given a fuck in 2016 so I would have not voted for her. This whole thing is just so, so embarassing.a lot of people seem to have forgotten about this and her blatant islamophobia and racism in the 08 campaign. she's conniving, manipulative and BITTER. years later, she's still fuming about her blunderous campaign and gaslighting people about bernie's record while her stans dismiss her friendships with war criminals and defense of rapists.
bUt WhAt AbOuT pArTy UnItY her stans screamed when anyone dared question her in 2016 and here she is at her big fucking age admitting to being a bitter sore loser who can't even agree to endorse bernie if he was the nom. its not fucking difficult hillary, blue no matter what. "A pRiVaTe CiTiZeN cAn EnDoRsSE wHoEvEr ShE WaNtS" becoming the new line. love this hypocritical centrist energy, yas queen
It's almost like she has the worst political instincts of anyone that has ever existed.
Why should she?
Him doing that in 2016 was the right thing to do because he was running against her and he lost decisively. She doesn't need to do anything for anyone this year just like Obama is under no obligation to. Neither are currently President. Neither are currently running. She is a private citizen who didn't run at all this time, like y'all wanted specifically to happen btw
In fact I remember the exact discussions that have happened since the week after she lost in 2016: the consensus seemed to have been from a vast majority of you that she should fuck off into the woods and not be part of active politics anymore. So which is it, you want her to be gone forever like the relic you claim she is, or you want her campaigning for/promoting whoever the primaries winner is? It can't be both, those are completely contradictory positions
Judging it from the fact that she has been the target of endless conspiracy theory smear since the 90's, the source being the GOP?
Why should she?
Him doing that in 2016 was the right thing to do because he was running against her and he lost decisively. She doesn't need to do anything for anyone this year just like Obama is under no obligation to. Neither are currently President. Neither are currently running. She is a private citizen who didn't run at all this time, like y'all wanted specifically to happen btw
In fact I remember the exact discussions that have happened since the week after she lost in 2016: the consensus seemed to have been from a vast majority of you that she should fuck off into the woods and not be part of active politics anymore. So which is it, you want her to be gone forever like the relic you claim she is, or you want her campaigning for/promoting whoever the primaries winner is? It can't be both, those are completely contradictory positions
I actually hadn't thought of this before. That's fucked up. The phrase should be ban worthy.This actually reminds me, anyone who dislikes Bernie supporters, please avoid using Bernie bros instead as I've seen a sizeable amount of trans women who support him whose dysphoria is triggered when they get lumped in as Bernie Bros
Thanks and agreed... She has indeed accomplished a lot.Just pulling from this:
She was a fairly effective Senator (I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that #1 happened while she was Secretary of State, and she shepherded the treaty through the Senate). Have to keep in mind that her eight years entirely overlapped with Bush's as President, thus most of the Democratic achievements from that era would be small potatoes.
That link summarizes some of her achievements as First Lady and Secretary of State as well, which is worth a read. She's an accomplished woman and anyone boiling her career down to "hurr she got Trump elected" disgusts me.
I can't see how you're failing to acknowledge Bernie's criticism is over how the legislation works and how it's inherently racist? Or how the other people who voted for/supported it were happy with the extremely racist elements of it both then and now?
Anyway fuck off with "The crime bill had good and bad sides" given how much irreparable damage it's caused to minority communities over decades. I'm not going to engage any more with that nonsense. The fact you'll happily ignore the fact it's easily resolved by not attaching pro women policy to anti-minority policy is suspect as fuck.