• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

RPTGB

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,189
UK
Great stuff so far but it's a bit weird seeing all these actors I recognise from Channel 4 and BBC sitcoms or murder of the week shows, playing these very serious Russians.

Wonder if we will see the "Elephant's Foot"?

wiki
 

Kin5290

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,390
The problem isn't a character making mistakes, it's literal misinformation. People are going to treat things presented as facts from the established expert character as facts.



You can't blame the audience, but you can sure as hell blame the writing. The issue is that it's really not representing what happened to a startling degree (like the "megatons" garbage), but looks and feels like it is. For example...



The show seems to imply the radiation messed with the helicopter systems or pilots, leading to them getting disoriented, clipping a cable and crashing. In reality there was a helicopter crash near the core but it was months after the accident (and after months of successful drops), and they clipped a crane in broad daylight (had nothing to do with the radiation).
The show literally shows them clipping the cable...
 

NeoBob688

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,635
The tendency of English language programming to attempt to sound more akin to the language they are representing by use of English with "accents" is the worst, most idiotic, silly thing and it makes no sense at all. Either get original language actors or do it in the language of the show. So the way Chernobyl does it is fine with me.
 

Prinz Eugn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,393
The show literally shows them clipping the cable...

Yes. Read what I wrote. They basically implied the crash into the crane had something to do with the radiation around the core (all the talk of perimeters and the radio breaking up), when in reality it didn't. That implied link to radiation is what led to the above confusion.
 

Deleted member 21709

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
23,310
The problem isn't a character making mistakes, it's literal misinformation. People are going to treat things presented as facts from the established expert character as facts.



You can't blame the audience, but you can sure as hell blame the writing. The issue is that it's really not representing what happened to a startling degree (like the "megatons" garbage), but looks and feels like it is. For example...



The show seems to imply the radiation messed with the helicopter systems or pilots, leading to them getting disoriented, clipping a cable and crashing. In reality there was a helicopter crash near the core but it was months after the accident (and after months of successful drops), and they clipped a crane in broad daylight (had nothing to do with the radiation).

So you want them to show months of successful helicopter drops? Or to not show it at all?

I just feel like this show is getting far too much scrutiny for the wrong reasons. It is not claiming to be anything but what it is.
On gaming-side it would be the equivalent of going into a DriveClub thread to post about how unrealistic the driving model is. Okay.
 

Corporal

Member
Oct 27, 2017
807
We just need to agree on the fact that this is a series created for entertainment, loosely based on a real world catastrope. Not some sort of documentary or fact review video series.

That said, I'd kill for a companion series that went all in on the subject and highlighted the shortcuts and halftruths in this, as a sort of educational partner series filled with interviews of survivors and facts and blueprints and science and whatnot. Always referencing the current episode and maybe even some behind-the-scenes stuff like the costumes etc, while providing the comparatively dry reality behind it all. Basically, a wiki/duckduckgo spree condensed into bite-sized videos. The podcast is cute and all, but it's just two dudes talking and there's loads and loads of stuff falling by the wayside due to the format.
 

RedSwirl

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,049
That said, I'd kill for a companion series that went all in on the subject and highlighted the shortcuts and halftruths in this, as a sort of educational partner series filled with interviews of survivors and facts and blueprints and science and whatnot. Always referencing the current episode and maybe even some behind-the-scenes stuff like the costumes etc, while providing the comparatively dry reality behind it all. Basically, a wiki/duckduckgo spree condensed into bite-sized videos. The podcast is cute and all, but it's just two dudes talking and there's loads and loads of stuff falling by the wayside due to the format.

That's more or less what the podcast is.

But I get what you're saying, productions like this often do have pure documentaries to go along with them or sometimes immediately after.
 

Prinz Eugn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,393
If you're going to dramatize to this extent, don't center the pitch and marketing so much around authenticity.
So you want them to show months of successful helicopter drops? Or to not show it at all?

I just feel like this show is getting far too much scrutiny for the wrong reasons. It is not claiming to be anything but what it is.
On gaming-side it would be the equivalent of going into a DriveClub thread to post about how unrealistic the driving model is. Okay.

How about not showing a helicopter crashing in the first drop, because flying helicopters low over a burning nuclear reactor should be a high-tension enough scenario for anybody. Hell, it'd make sense to save the excitement of the crash for the boring recovery phase, when it actually happened.

Dramatization is fine, but they way the creators talk about the authenticity but alter aspects of the core event (and phenomena) is misleading, and has mislead people in this very thread. It literally purports to be an accurate representation, according to the write-producer:

The word "Chernobyl" is a heart-stopper, and this series lives up to that sense of dread. What was the most important ingredient for striking the right series tone?
We all felt a need to be as clear-eyed and honest about what happened as we could be. That meant looking unblinkingly at some very hard-to-look-at things, some scary things, but to do so in a way that wasn't sensationalist. We're not interested and have never been interested in making a disaster show or a horror show or a political thriller. This was never about trying to fit into a genre. This is really about us trying to fit into the reality of what Chernobyl was. We really tried to make what was real and what really happened our beacon, and we followed that as best we could.

...

You obviously used stand-in locations for Chernobyl and the nearby city of Pripyat. How important was authenticity for those details and others?
We were obsessed with authenticity. All of us … with getting every detail right, right down to shoelaces, down to watches, eyeglasses, hats, and hairstyles. That's not because we had some strange fetish for arcane accuracy. It's because we were telling a human story, and part of that is getting those details right out of respect for them. I know that there are people alive today who were in that power plant that night, [or] whose loved ones died, [or] who are walking around without a thyroid gland because of Chernobyl. The people who made this cared enough to get it right, and we really, really did.

And not only does the creator of the show make these claims, but people are buying it as a representation of fact. In the broader context, this is bad because nuclear power is thoroughly misunderstood but potentially important as a low-carbon emission energy source.
 

Tap In

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,034
Gilbert AZ
Damned good show.

Realism always takes a back seat to entertainment while telling a composite story. Don't see the big deal. When I'm done watching this I'll go watch all the docs referred in this thread that I've saved on YT.

Will be nice to see the facts. Until then this show is doing a great job of good acting and story telling and scaring the shit out of me with enough reality to make it have meaning.
 

Olaf

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,419
Rule 34 Chernobyl:

vL3TX5J.jpg
 

Soupman Prime

The Fallen
Nov 8, 2017
8,553
Boston, MA
A coworker has been talking about watching it so I had some time and did and I'm hooked. Went to watch the next episode then saw I had to wait till the 20th, I assumed the series was released all at once and wasn't a weekly thing.

Need to go back and get the names of certain characters but there were 3 guys who were the worst. I hope we see them again soon.
 

hydruxo

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,407
Saw the first ep last night and I don't usually get squeamish but they did a great job of portraying how horrific those injuries were. Radiation just freaks me the hell out, this is going to be a rough but fascinating watch for sure.
 

Hypron

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,059
NZ
The tendency of English language programming to attempt to sound more akin to the language they are representing by use of English with "accents" is the worst, most idiotic, silly thing and it makes no sense at all. Either get original language actors or do it in the language of the show. So the way Chernobyl does it is fine with me.

Yep. I really don't get why English language movies and shows do fake accents so often when taking place in foreign countries. It's just not a thing in other languages I know of.

I much prefer the way this show handles it. Let the actors act in their original accent – the audience isn't stupid, we know it's taking place in Ukraine, we don't need the actors to remind us of that by putting on fake accents.

Also, fake French accents make me cringe real bad... I assume it'd be similar for Ukrainians and therefore it's just more respectful not to do it.
 
Last edited:

Tap In

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,034
Gilbert AZ
Yep. I really don't get why English language movies and shows do fake accents so often when taking place in foreign countries. It's just not a thing in other languages I know of.

I much prefer the way this show handles it. Let the actors act in their original accent – the audience isn't stupid, we know it's taking place in Ukraine, we don't need actors to remind us of that by putting on fake accents.

Also, fake French accents make me cringe real bad... I assume it'd be similar for Ukrainians and therefore it's just more respectful not to do it.
Yep the director said as much in podcast. He said they wanted the actors that they chose and tried several actors using accents and said they can go wrong real quick and be almost farcical and wanted to avoid the trope. So natural language and focusing on the story and characters was the direction from early on.
 

BrutalInsane

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
2,080
Just caught the first two episodes, it's fantastic. The last half hour of the second episode (from the committee meeting onwards) was especially tense.

Being a 10 year old in the 1986, it brings me back to the existential dread of that time, I remember this, the Challenger explosion, bombing Libya and Khadaffi saying the streets of the US will 'run red with blood', the threat of nuclear war, acid rain and the AIDS virus pulling apart my young mind, and I remember it vividly. It's personally fascinating.
 

Somnia

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,940
I was enjoying reading this thread until the last couple pages. I get it that it's not 100% but come on...
 

SofNascimento

cursed
Member
Oct 28, 2017
21,258
São Paulo - Brazil
The show does give an air of trying to be very authentic, seeing that it takes major liberties is quite disappointing. I don't want check everything just to see if that's close to the truth or not.

Of couse, in the end it's a TV Series and they have other priorities, but thinking that some of that drama was created by situations that are very far from reality does take some of the show's weight away. And, as I mentioned, puts a ? in every scene.
 

Androidsleeps

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,577
The show is fucking amazing, hooked from the first episode. The podcast and the "making of" are really good, too.
 
Apr 17, 2019
1,376
Viridia
Being a very authentic representation in terms of aesthetics and chain of events doesn't necessarily mean 100% historical accuracy. At least for me.

But to recap the "major" liberties taken so far is
  • Immediate effects of radiation, and exaggerated claims of remaining lifespan for a few characters.
  • Helicopter crash scene
  • Amalgamation of various Soviet scientists into one character.
  • Exaggerated dangers of the second steam explosion. Though there was an actual claim by a scientist it has been discredited since.
Cmiiw but that's all so far right? I can roll with this given the things they've done right (atmosphere etc).
 
Oct 26, 2017
19,729
I'm fine with the exaggeration of the second explosion. We're taking everything out of his mouth as fact, but we've seen him already wrong about something in episode 2. It seems like a narrative choice simply for more drama, but....if someone at the time in real life expressed the possibility, even if wrong, then I'm fine with a character expressing it as well in a TV show.
 

Tugatrix

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
3,260
Being a very authentic representation in terms of aesthetics and chain of events doesn't necessarily mean 100% historical accuracy. At least for me.

But to recap the "major" liberties taken so far is
  • Immediate effects of radiation, and exaggerated claims of remaining lifespan for a few characters.
  • Helicopter crash scene
  • Amalgamation of various Soviet scientists into one character.
  • Exaggerated dangers of the second steam explosion. Though there was an actual claim by a scientist it has been discredited since.
Cmiiw but that's all so far right? I can roll with this given the things they've done right (atmosphere etc).

Considering the inaction of the Politburo I think they exaggerated for a reason, just saying
 

fade

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
3,510
Yes. Read what I wrote. They basically implied the crash into the crane had something to do with the radiation around the core (all the talk of perimeters and the radio breaking up), when in reality it didn't. That implied link to radiation is what led to the above confusion.

It did have something to do with the radiation didn't it? From what I've read many pilots threw up after doing multiple runs daily. I thought the common theory was that the pilot hit the cable due to being disoriented. The only thing off is that it showed it as the first flight.
 

SofNascimento

cursed
Member
Oct 28, 2017
21,258
São Paulo - Brazil
Being a very authentic representation in terms of aesthetics and chain of events doesn't necessarily mean 100% historical accuracy. At least for me.

But to recap the "major" liberties taken so far is
  • Immediate effects of radiation, and exaggerated claims of remaining lifespan for a few characters.
  • Helicopter crash scene
  • Amalgamation of various Soviet scientists into one character.
  • Exaggerated dangers of the second steam explosion. Though there was an actual claim by a scientist it has been discredited since.
Cmiiw but that's all so far right? I can roll with this given the things they've done right (atmosphere etc).

How unrealistic is it when dealing with radiation? Particularly the short term effects you mentioned.
 

Bryo4321

Member
Nov 20, 2017
1,511
How unrealistic is it when dealing with radiation? Particularly the short term effects you mentioned.
The physical effects are exaggerated. Bloody lesions magically appearing within minutes, or the firefighter touching that debris and his hand looking like a rotten steak minutes later is really exaggerated. While radiation burn is real, In the most severe cases you dont really see burns quite like how they depict. The type of skin necrosis they show did happen to firefighters, but I've only seen a picture of comparable severity to what they show, and the picture was from 40 days after the incident. Typically stage 1 symptoms would probably be visible within hours like vomiting, but hair loss, convulsions and the outwardly visible effects come on stage 3.
 
Last edited:

VN1X

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
2,027
Watching this with bated breath. It's just unfathomable to me that all this actually occurred in the year I was born. The powers at work here are incomprehensible and make my skin crawl.

Can't wait for episode 3. Will definitely get it on BD as soon as it's made available.
 

SofNascimento

cursed
Member
Oct 28, 2017
21,258
São Paulo - Brazil
The physical effects are exaggerated. Bloody lesions magically appearing within minutes, or the firefighter touching that debris and his hand looking like a rotten steak minutes later is really exaggerated. While radiation burn is real, In the most severe cases you dont really see burns quite like how they depict. The type of skin necrosis they show did happen to firefighters, but I've only seen a picture of comparable severity to what they show, and the picture was from 40 days after the incident. Typically stage 1 symptoms would probably be visible within hours like vomiting, but hair loss, convulsions and the outwardly visible effects come on stage 3.

That's disappointing. Radiation was cooler when I thought the effects were so immediate and apparent.
 
Oct 26, 2017
19,729
That's disappointing. Radiation was cooler when I thought the effects were so immediate and apparent.
Also remember, I don't know if we have records of anyone actually picking up graphite in their hand, so while the effects might be exaggerated, I'm not sure if we know what would happen if someone actually picked up a piece of graphite as radioactive as that piece. And if you want interesting for radiation, there are folks whose eyes supposedly changed color due to the intense radiation and who had blisters on their hearts. It does some crazy shit.
 

Spoder

Member
Oct 24, 2017
234
That's disappointing. Radiation was cooler when I thought the effects were so immediate and apparent.

I find it scarier because it's not immediately apparent. Unlike being burned or other violent deaths, getting poisoned by fatal radiation seem more eerie because they're just as dead but they don't show it yet. If the effect is visible, both on the source and the victims, there will probably be less people dying because of radiation.
 

TheCool69

Member
Oct 27, 2017
116
I'd like to recommend Serhii Plokhys Chernobyl- History of a Tragedy which is insanely detailed an researched full-scale history of this disaster
 

Ziltoidia 9

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,141
Watched the first two epis last night. I enjoy it, don't know how accurate it is, but I feel like im somewhat learning about what occurred.
 

SofNascimento

cursed
Member
Oct 28, 2017
21,258
São Paulo - Brazil
Also remember, I don't know if we have records of anyone actually picking up graphite in their hand, so while the effects might be exaggerated, I'm not sure if we know what would happen if someone actually picked up a piece of graphite as radioactive as that piece. And if you want interesting for radiation, there are folks whose eyes supposedly changed color due to the intense radiation and who had blisters on their hearts. It does some crazy shit.

Gratitude. So I take radiation is messy.

I find it scarier because it's not immediately apparent. Unlike being burned or other violent deaths, getting poisoned by fatal radiation seem more eerie because they're just as dead but they don't show it yet. If the effect is visible, both on the source and the victims, there will probably be less people dying because of radiation.

I like both scenarios. Radiation is scary because how it can be both invisible and utterly deadly. But to think it could act so fast when the exposure is big enough gave an even greater power to it in my eyes.
 

KINGofCRA5H

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,076
Napa, CA
Saw the first ep last night and I don't usually get squeamish but they did a great job of portraying how horrific those injuries were. Radiation just freaks me the hell out, this is going to be a rough but fascinating watch for sure.

wait till you see episode 2. talk about tension. they portray the silent killer that is radiation perfectly.
 

Prinz Eugn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,393
Yeah, part of what makes radiation so scary is that you can be very super dead from it and have no idea.

It did have something to do with the radiation didn't it? From what I've read many pilots threw up after doing multiple runs daily. I thought the common theory was that the pilot hit the cable due to being disoriented. The only thing off is that it showed it as the first flight.

I dug a little bit but I haven't read anything very explicit. In an interview, one of the pilots says he refused to fly just because of the cranes, no mention of radiation.

The reason why I really don't think it's radiation is because it frankly doesn't make sense it would suddenly cause a crash after months of helicopter drops, at a time when the radiation levels had been significantly reduced. Like, the helicopters from the first two weeks were so irradiated they are still sitting in the exclusion zone as radiation hazards. If the radiation was a contributing factor to that crash months later, it was then enormously lucky for it to have not caused one early on. I believe the threshold for throwing up afterwards is also a lot lower than disorientation (especially immediate disorientation).
 

Deleted member 42055

User requested account closure
Banned
Apr 12, 2018
11,215
After the clusterfuck that GOT turned into I refuse to allow some of you to take my love for this show with your " Well, actuaaaally" comments , don't put that evil on me