This legit looks like a linear progression to me:
It's a gradual and consistent progression into the legitimately Dreamworks CGI level visuals we're seeing today.
I wasn't. Because I wasn't talking about the actual games when they released, the downgradathons were real, I was talking about the graphics hype going into the next gen. People say here that everyone's always disappointed about the jump in graphics when the new console gen is revealed, when that emphatically wasn't the case with this gen (nor any previous ones). It's just that we are now getting to a point of diminishing returns.Lol the original Deep Down trailer was not real footage and neither was that first Watch Dogs trailer.
Final version of Watch Dogs looked pretty fucking bad in comparison to that reveal trailer, and Deep Down never even came out.
Police car door being closed with The Division, and the final version of that was also a significant downgrade from what was first shown.
I hope you are being sarcastic
I agree that they look better - as it would be strange otherwise all things considering. But not by "a lot".I do not see diminishing returns in graphics. The PS5 games shown off, even at 30 fps, looked a lot better than all PS4 games. A lot.
Talking about Base PS4 here, not the pro!I agree that they look better - as it would be strange otherwise all things considering. But not by "a lot".
I'm not even considering resolutions or framerate at this point, just pure graphics comparisons. So far the only truly "next gen" showcase remains the UE5 demo. And Project Athia to a degree I guess.
It's a linear progression if you have no idea what linear progression means. The difference between PS4 and PS5 Ratchet is markedly smaller than the other ones, and the difference between PS2 and PS3 Ratchet is gigantic.
Real-time means it's being rendered in-engine with game assets, running off the local hardware. Which Horizon was.
Pre-rendered would mean the footage was rendered in advance, and likely not on the actual console hardware.
uh-huhGet your eyes checked. The jump in detail and lighting is easily as big as the jump from PS3 > PS4.
I agree, and it was noticeable immediately. The detail, density, and lighting and particle effects look far better than PS4 games, I don't see how someone can say different.I do not see diminishing returns in graphics. The PS5 games shown off, even at 30 fps, looked a lot better than all PS4 games. A lot.
they showed some gameplay but it didnt looked as next gen. but my guess is probably something like this
Assassin's Creed Unity Remastered | Xbox Series X Graphics with DirectX Ray Tracing Technology
if Assassin's Creed Unity Remastered Xbox Series X Graphics with DirectX Ray Tracing Technology Assassin's Creed Unity Remastered for Ray-Tracing Support. th...youtu.be
Aren't those links not working?
PS5 and Xbox Series X Will Hit a Graphics Dead-End
The PS5 and Xbox Series X may not have the big leap in graphical fidelity that we're used to with previous console generations.www.ccn.com
**Images fixed
Not gameplay:
Gameplay:
Tell me whats wrong about this pls?
Get your eyes checked. The jump in detail and lighting is easily as big as the jump from PS3 > PS4.
I totally agree.I do not see diminishing returns in graphics. The PS5 games shown off, even at 30 fps, looked a lot better than all PS4 games. A lot.
But why didn't they show us gameplay footage instead of cinematic stuff (that many here rightly mistook for prerendered stuff) ? They did show us gameplay scenes when they revealed the first game. Weren't people blown away by what they showed back then ? Why not doing the same here ? I don't understand.I expect gameplay in HZD 2 to be very similar to this footage. When has GG shown footage that was noticeably superior to the final product?
Note - killzone 2 CGI was not done by GG.
But why didn't they show us gameplay footage instead of cinematic stuff (that many here rightly mistook for prerendered stuff) ? They did show us gameplay scenes when they revealed the first game. Weren't people blown away by what they showed back then ? Why not doing the same here ? I don't understand.
People weren't really claiming diminishing returns going from PS2 to PS3 gen, were they? I don't even remember it going from PS3 to PS4 gen, but I believe it happened, much more than from PS2 to PS3.
Was part of that because they released it only 4 years after the OG Xbox?Of course it happened, I mean claiming the 360 was "Xbox 1.5" was a thing for a good while on message boards and whatnot.
Was part of that because they released it only 4 years after the OG Xbox?
Remember everyone saying they would just keep their 360 because there's no reason to ever upgrade?
I just want Geometry Wars or Super Stardust in 4K 120fps with some extra bells and whistles.
Isn't 90% of the problem that we're seeing it all through not great quality streams? The still images I've looked at look pretty great.
Again as pointed out in the past that wouldn't have mattered. Stream quality good or bad you could see a generational leap. It's getting harder and harder to tell the differences.
right, i think people either just watched the launch stream or didnt go and look at the 4k videos..I do not see diminishing returns in graphics. The PS5 games shown off, even at 30 fps, looked a lot better than all PS4 games. A lot.
this is bullshit.The only game that truly blew me away graphically was Kena. Ratchet would be second, though it suffered a bit of just looking like a slightly better PS4 game with ray traced reflections.