I mean, I don't know where you're from but it's pretty common courtesy in the US. Some people don't think it's rude to enter someone's house with their shoes on; that doesn't mean I stomp on in to people's homes with my dirty shoes saying "well I don't think it's rude so you shouldn't care!" No, it's not "civilization destroying" rude or even "spit in your face" rude but it's still rude and I don't get why pointing that out is such an issue to some people?
Why are you trying so hard to spin this? Yes, there's nothing rude about friends sitting together but I'm confused why you've now made it only about friends sitting together in a vacuum when that was never the issue. The issue was not having someone sit up front with OP because it's a rude gesture to someone driving you as a favor as opposed to a service. It makes it feel like you don't want to be near them or converse/interact with them and just want them to go on and do their "job", which is apparently the case since they didn't seem to even include OP in conversation. Handle some slight discomfort to show some appreciation and respect to people doing you a favor. You can stomach not sitting next to your friend for a single car ride. Really. You'll live. It really is no surprise we have so many people post on this site struggling with basic ass social skills.
No... it really isn't. You need to look up the definition of gossip.
Disregarding that, your argument that simply mentioning a rude act someone did to you to anyone else is actually even worse than anything the person could've done. It's ridiculous and the fact that you have to keep framing the OP as "ranting" when it's clearly not shows how far you have to spin this to make your point.
Like I said, this is all anonymous anyway. We have no way of knowing who any of the people involved are. It could be made up for all we know. It doesn't effect the two women in any way, shape or form. The way they acted, however, did effect OP directly, which is why it was rude to him. We don't need to send them to prison over this; I don't know why we have to argue that it wasn't even slightly rude when this is such a norm.
I kind of felt this vibe from your initial post but didn't want to just assume that's the angle you were going for. It's pretty obvious now that you see this as some sort of sexism issue and that's the reason why you're so dismissive about it. I mean, this is the very definition of spinning this into something completely different. The sex of the people involved have no relevance to the question presented by the OP: Is it rude to not sit in the passenger seat when someone you know is doing you a favor and driving you somewhere? OP could be female, the passengers male. They could all be male or all female or any mix between the 3 people. It doesn't matter and it's almost comical that you're making it about that. It's a very basic and common social norm that most people have the sense to understand."Spinning" implies I'm trying to deflect from an obvious truth that, quite frankly, isn't the case here. People are defining an act that isn't objectively rude as rude, and judging women who prefer to sit together rather than apart as such based on this not-at-all-universal view that it's rude.
It's "bitch eating crackers" territory. Just because the driver is upset that the women didn't show him the deference he apparently think he's owed but didn't communicate doesn't mean they were being rude. We also only have what he tells us to go on. They very well may have exchanged pleasantries, then talked with each other the rest of the way. We don't know, since they're not here to share their view.
Really, this is all coming across as the guy being mad his Grand Gesture of driving someone wasn't afforded the respect and gratitude he seems to believe he's entitled to. This is just me, but when I do a favor it's to help someone, not to be thanked for doing it and get pissy if it doesn't occur in the way I expect to be thanked.
This is without even getting into the myriad reasons a woman might be reticent to sit up front with a man they don't know very well.
They didn't do anything wrong.
I kind of felt this vibe from your initial post but didn't want to just assume that's the angle you were going for. It's pretty obvious now that you see this as some sort of sexism issue and that's the reason why you're so dismissive about it. I mean, this is the very definition of spinning this into something completely different. The sex of the people involved have no relevance to the question presented by the OP: Is it rude to not sit in the passenger seat when someone you know is doing you a favor and driving you somewhere? OP could be female, the passengers male. They could all be male or all female or any mix between the 3 people. It doesn't matter and it's almost comical that you're making it about that. It's a very basic and common social norm that most people have the sense to understand.
You're going so out of your way, bending over backwards to justify your bias here. Not only do you immediately distrust OP's account of the events for no real reason, you exaggerate and mischaracterize him as some sort of "Nice guy" villain archetype that would curse out a woman who didn't thank him for holding a door open. Then you say there are a myriad of reasons they, as women, would be reticent to sit up from with him because he's a man. A myriad. Did you completely forget how he's their friend's husband and they've been staying at their home for the weekend? He's not just some random dude. What exactly did you think OP was going to do to one of them if they sat up front? If it's anything close to what you're implying, I wonder why they'd even step foot in the car to begin with. It's absolutely silly how much your projecting is muddying up a very simple social etiquette question.
They were rude. Should they be brought to trial for it? No. But yeah, it was a little rude and you don't need to try this hard to dismiss that fact.
Get a wife with better friends. Problem solved.I'd honestly prefer my wife's friends sit in the back and don't talk to me
If I'm being honest I don't think she even likes them that much
It depends, honestly. Some friends of mine do get mad if you sit on the backseat alone, but others don't.
With close friends I always go shotgun, but with random people I go for the backseat. OP's case could be many things, from them seeing OP as just a driver to them wanting to talk about the trip without having to look back all the time, we cannot know the motive with what we've seen.
It won't stop people from jumping at the OP for a myriad of reasons though, see previous posts.
Ranting anonymously behind your friends back on the internet seems a lot more rude than two friends choosing to sit together in the back of the car someone offered to drive them in.
It's gossip!
OP should just tell them he was offended and ask them why they did (and tell us what they said).
Neither woman opting to ride up front with a stranger instead of sitting together and talking?
Wow, how rude!
/s
It's "bitch eating crackers" territory. Just because the driver is upset that the women didn't show him the deference he apparently think he's owed but didn't communicate doesn't mean they were being rude. We also only have what he tells us to go on. They very well may have exchanged pleasantries, then talked with each other the rest of the way. We don't know, since they're not here to share their view.
2 in front and 1 in the back doesn't carry the same social association with chauffeurs and cab drivers. Also, it's simply logistical. Your friend in the back should realize they're only back there because they physically cannot fit up front. Having two people in the back just because they're friends is done to stay in a comfort zone which is inconsiderate to the driver. It's like inviting your friends over for dinner with your family and they just sit in the corner talking to themselves instead of trying to engage with your family. Sure, they don't really know your family but that's still rude.There's two of them and only one front seat. Plus, they don't really know you. I don't think it's weird that they both chose to sit in the back in that situation.
I think it's weirder to take offense to it, but I guess that's just me.2 in front and 1 in the back doesn't carry the same social association with chauffeurs and cab drivers. Also, it's simply logistical. Your friend in the back should realize they're only back there because they physically cannot fit up front. Having two people in the back just because they're friends is done to stay in a comfort zone which is inconsiderate to the driver. It's like inviting your friends over for dinner with your family and they just sit in the corner talking to themselves instead of trying to engage with your family. Sure, they don't really know your family but that's still rude.
That's why "they don't really know you" doesn't fly here. OP isn't just some rando who picked them up off the side of the road. He's their friend's spouse. Is this not the perfect time to attempt to get to know him at least a little? I feel that if I respect my friend, I'm going to do my best to respect their SO and if not be a friend, be at least a friendly acquaintance. I think most people would find it off putting if their good friends never made an effort to know their SOs a bit or even attempted to converse with them normally. They would wonder if their friends disliked their SO since they were always keeping them at an arm's length.
Plus, they just stayed in their home! It's not just their friend's home but OP's as well. Not only that, OP is giving them a ride to the airport. I think that requires some basic gratitude and manners beyond what you would give to some rando. Just the slightest effort to include OP and not treat them like you want nothing to do with them but still expect them to do things for you. Sitting in the back and just chatting it up amongst each other is some anti-social weirdness.
As I've already made clear, this past weekend was my first time meeting them.
You haven't known them for a particularly long period of time and I don't think it's either rude nor unusual for the two of them to want to sit together. I personally think them not speaking with you at all is more unusual. I don't think it would've made a difference if one sat in the back and one in the front if they ended up just talking to each other anyway and ignoring you.
Where do people get this from that it's poor manners? I've never heard this ever in my life. Isn't it better that two friends sit where they're most comfortable? Isn't that what's most important?
What's most important to me in that moment is irrelevant because someone else is spending their time and money, albeit indirectly, to provide me a favor. Sometimes good manners requires assuming a minor inconvenience to show gratitude.Where do people get this from that it's poor manners? I've never heard this ever in my life. Isn't it better that two friends sit where they're most comfortable? Isn't that what's most important?
This is never something that was never brought up to me and something that I've never encountered or have heard of. Besides that, as host, you're the one in your element, the guests are outside theirs so their comfort should come above yours. Of course guests need to be courteous as well but sitting in the back to be next to your friend isn't something that I'd consider a slight. Definitely not enough to make a thread over it.What's most important to me in that moment is irrelevant because someone else is spending their time and money, albeit indirectly, to provide me a favor. Sometimes good manners requires assuming a minor inconvenience to show gratitude.
I was taught the courteous thing would be to sit in the front, get to know the husband of your friend better by building on that common friendship, rather than leaving him alone in the front as if they are your paid driver. It's a small showing of inclusiveness, but sometimes that's all good manners/etiquette is.
Where did I get it from? I learned it while I was young and growing up. Perhaps even directly from my parents.