Available June 21, cool trailer.
Also here is a Pottermore article with a bunch of info/trivia about the game.
Also here is a Pottermore article with a bunch of info/trivia about the game.
AR games?Damn these type of gamings are cropping up more lately, is there genre name for this already?
Damn these type of gamings are cropping up more lately, is there genre name for this already?
I want a more catchy and corny one like 'schlooter'. Don't fail me Era lol
I want a more catchy and corny one like 'schlooter'. Don't fail me Era lol
I want a more catchy and corny one like 'schlooter'. Don't fail me Era lol
Niantic AR?Damn these type of gamings are cropping up more lately, is there genre name for this already?
Seems legit.So the female lead in the trailer sees the world falling into chaos outside her window, immediately grabs her gear to confidently leap into action and fight, then chickens out once she gets to an ice cream truck and watches, cowering, as the two boy wizards charge into battle instead? Blech.
It's better that way, it ryhmes with schlockYo, dawg. There aint no "c" in the words looter or shooter. The abomination of a word used to describe the genre is "shlooter." It is bad enough as it is. Don't go adding unnecessary letters to make it even uglier.
So the female lead in the trailer sees the world falling into chaos outside her window, immediately grabs her gear to confidently leap into action and fight, then chickens out once she gets to an ice cream truck and watches, cowering, as the two boy wizards charge into battle instead? Blech.
A bit unrelated, but does anyone know if this project is next gen, or current?
Damn these type of gamings are cropping up more lately, is there genre name for this already?
A bit unrelated, but does anyone know if this project is next gen, or current?
A bit unrelated, but does anyone know if this project is next gen, or current?
I live near Universal Orlando, so I'll probably go try the game there tomorrow. It'll be fitting playing in Diagon Alley.
That said, I can't believe the game is about to release and I still don't understand how this is going to hook people like Pokemon Go has. Catching actual Pokemon, with the added thrill of obtaining Shiny variants, leveling them up and using them in battle is a fun concept, especially to flaunt socially.
Here, though, there's nothing to catch and flaunt that I can tell. I can't see an element to which other players will be excited by what another player has accomplished, or what they may want to trade for.
Yeah, better potions, skill treees, stronger spells, collectibles are in play, but they're all on the back end; nothing for other players to easily discern. Does that make sense?
I'm sure some replies will be questioning why I want recognition above all else, and I don't, but let's be real, an enjoyable aspect of social games/MMOs is the fun of flaunting your best shiny/mount/gear/etc.
What's this got for that?
So the female lead in the trailer sees the world falling into chaos outside her window, immediately grabs her gear to confidently leap into action and fight, then chickens out once she gets to an ice cream truck and watches, cowering, as the two boy wizards charge into battle instead? Blech.
Okay yeah, the Pokestops are the same in this game, though since there's no gyms the ones I can see are Pokestop equivalants(guess they are called inns). There's also added fortresses which I'm not sure what those are yet.so will this use all the same locations as Pokemon Go? I live right behind a Pokestop(with a gym about a 5 minute walk away) and work in proximity to two Pokestops and a gym. Would be neat to use the same locations in this game.
If this is the lense you see the world through I feel really sorry for you.
Feel however you want – it's narratively dumb. Remove or reverse the genders if you want to: It doesn't make sense to open with a hero character seeing danger and running toward it, then having that same character do a total reversal and act like a scaredy-cat when they get to the fight that they just ran straight toward on purpose.
I see your point but idk there might have been some other possibilities in play here. Maybe she thought it was something else, or there were more enemies then she was expecting.
Feel however you want – it's narratively dumb. Remove or reverse the genders if you want to: It doesn't make sense to open with a hero character seeing danger and running toward it, then having that same character do a total reversal and act like a scaredy-cat when they get to the fight that they just ran straight toward on purpose.
The trailer doesn't exist in a vacuum, it exists in a world where women and female characters are consistently sidelined or portrayed as needing protecting by male characters.Maybe the kids were just having fun and role playing. Maybe their plan was for her to run out and be a diversion while the two others attacked!
Maybe they are just kids of any gender or race. Who cares! Stop making it more then it is.