DLSS has different performance and IQ depending on your choice of mode (Balance, Quality, Performance, Ultra Performance) and your chosen resolution. Ultra performance at 4k is going to perform and look differently from Quality at 1440p.
DLSS has different performance and IQ depending on your choice of mode (Balance, Quality, Performance, Ultra Performance) and your chosen resolution. Ultra performance at 4k is going to perform and look differently from Quality at 1440p.
I mean that resolution isn't important here. If you're able to hit 144 fps at all in some title you would be able to hit it in any resolution if your GPU is capable enough.So as long as I have an amazing CPU with an average GPU I can expect 144fps in these new open-world games? Or do you just mean open-world games are fps limited by CPU/IO with the available hardware?
I currently have a 2080 and a 3900x is there a CPU I can switch to that could allow me to hit 144fps in Valhalla?
So are we just gonna believe random tweets with zero proof? Why aren't they just sharing the entire communication if they want to put nVidia on blast?
I'm skeptical. Need some receipts on this one.
Not at native res. With more aliasing and dot crawling everywhere.You mean where they leave out the context that 3060Ti is $100 cheaper and 3070 (same price) far surpasses 6800xt.
But you don't buy a GPU for only 1 year of gaming, people usually keep them for 3-4 years at least, sometimes more, so I think RT should be prioritized as well, especially for the long term.
All of this in addition to removing context that the 6800xt is rendering half the reflections in RT mode vs any Nvidia offerings.Not at native res. With more aliasing and dot crawling everywhere.
People have been saying this about Turing, didn't stop me from playing all RT games on it in 1440p. Now is the time to say the same (dubious) thing about Ampere, I guess. Mostly because RDNA2 is at Turing's RT performance level it seems?As far as ray tracing is concerned, this current gen of cards are a glorified beta test. The next gen or two of cards will be the true show for RT.
Dont buy a gpu expecting it to last forever. The 2080 ti a $1200 gpu that came out 2 years ago is getting beat by a $600 card. Not everyone has a massive budget. In that case the best rasterization performance for the cost might outweigh RT performance. Not everyone cares about RT. I had a 2070 and I dont think I used RT once because the performance hit didnt seem worth it.But you don't buy a GPU for only 1 year of gaming, people usually keep them for 3-4 years at least, sometimes more, so I think RT should be prioritized as well, especially for the long term.
Just saw the LTT segment and heard the full email. Jesus fucking Christ what a terrible look Nvidia.
Linus and Luke start reading the letter at 4:55 in the video.
Linus Torvalds said it best.
Indeed. But I'm glad Linus went ballistic on Nvidia, because this is inexcusable and unacceptable. And this is coming from someone who thinks DLSS is amazing technology and is excited to see the fruits of Nvidia's partnership with Nintendo with the successor to the Nintendo Switch.I was hoping we would get the other Linus also saying "Nvidia, fuck you". Golden opportunity missed :(
It was glorious. Can't wait to see whatever Steve from Gamers Nexus uploads regarding this.Indeed. But I'm glad Linus went ballistic on Nvidia, because this is inexcusable and unacceptable. And this is coming from someone who thinks DLSS is amazing technology and is excited to see the fruits of Nvidia's partnership with Nintendo with the successor to the Nintendo Switch.
Completely agree.Based on the Nvidia's letter to Hardware Unboxed that Linus read, Nvidia's actions are completely inexcusable and unacceptable.
Hardware Unboxed spent the better part of a year shitting on DLSS and claiming that AMD's image sharpening was a superior solution
I was surprised at the amount of bootlicking and benefit of the doubt given to Nvidia in this thread. HU has never been one to chase drama, and you'd have to be nuts to think Steve would misconstrue or worst yet lie about the contents of the letter Nvidia sent them given the attention this story would bring them. But even more importantly, Nvidia has a long, sordid hisory of these kinds of strong-arm tactics. What Nvidia did here is standard operation procedure when they want to send a message, and it should have surprised nobody.
They didn't forget. They always conveniently ignore it or avoid bringing it up, in the hopes of not hurting Nvidia's image.
bubububu rtxHow can you side with Nvidia on this lol.
Just PR nightmare from their Global Director of PR
Nvidia is in the right here, no matter what anyone says. Companies should get to control the opinions of those using their products for free, or else access to those products should be removed. If some insignificant YouTube channel can't handle the fire, they should just stay out of the kitchen.
Nvidia is in the right here, no matter what anyone says. Companies should get to control the opinions of those using their products for free, or else access to those products should be removed. If some insignificant YouTube channel can't handle the fire, they should just stay out of the kitchen.