He might not have received the message.Respect on Hank Azaria for making the apology. Now waiting on Matt Groening and the rest of the writers to do the same.
Why limit it just to the US though? This I don't quite understand, Simpsons airs in UK too. Sometimes it seems that everyone creating media internationally should be aware and mindful of the US, but US shouldn't be aware of anything outside of it. It reeks of Americentrism. Also in discussions on this board to be honest, if it's not perceived as a problem in the US, then it's not a problem. And definitely if it's a problem in the US, then it's a problem everywhere else too.
You do realise that The Simpsons gets broadcast around the world don't you?
Your post seems to dismiss other racism just because it doesn't affect your personal small bubble
The responses you quoted weren't being dismissive. They were criticism of a real thing and then you come and try to handwave it away too. I understand that you and countless of others have been through a lot because of stereotypical depictions like Apu in the show. But it doesn't make the pain felt by others any lesser. I agree with the criticism of the show, not dismissing it. And I'm not saying that this is necessarily the thread to talk about other stereotypes in Simpsons or media overall. Yet that doesn't mean I wouldn't call out problematic views that are presented in the thread, it shouldn't go unchallenged. I didn't respond to the person who brought up Willie, that wasn't the discussion I wanted to have in this thread. But the rather direct implication that global media should be viewed just through US lens, is definitely Americentrism. Americentrism and American exceptionalism are both issues. Not the discussion to have on this thread, but I feel I had to respond again because of the continuous dismissal of it. It's larger issue than just Simpsons and the Scottish and my comments weren't even about either of those. I wasn't trying to focus the discussion to other stereotypical depictions, I directly adressed people posting something questionable in this very thread.These are obtuse responses. Indian-American kids like me got bullied and had Apu thrown in our faces. It sucks having to explain to people that I don't worship cows.
Not all the stereotypes effected people in the same ways. It has nothing to do with Americentrism. If those Scottish stereotypes had adverse effects in other countries then we can talk about that. However, you can't use those other stereotypes in the show to whataboutism criticism about how Indian-American stereotypes effect Indian-Americans away. That's something I've notice people trying to do to dismiss criticisms of the show.
These are obtuse responses. Indian-American kids like me got bullied and had Apu thrown in our faces. It sucks having to explain to people that I don't worship cows.
Not all the stereotypes effected people in the same way. It has nothing to do with Americentrism. If those Scottish stereotypes had adverse effects in other countries then we can talk about that. However, you can't use those other stereotypes in the show to whataboutism criticism about how Indian-American stereotypes effect Indian-Americans away. That's something I've noticed people trying to do to dismiss criticisms of the show.
Why limit it just to the US though? This I don't quite understand, Simpsons airs in UK too. Sometimes it seems that everyone creating media internationally should be aware and mindful of the US, but US shouldn't be aware of anything outside of it. It reeks of Americentrism. Also in discussions on this board to be honest, if it's not perceived as a problem in the US, then it's not a problem. And definitely if it's a problem in the US, then it's a problem everywhere else too.
You do realise that The Simpsons gets broadcast around the world don't you?
Your post seems to dismiss other racism just because it doesn't affect your personal small bubble
I guarantee I'm not trying to be funny, quite the contrary I'm getting just angrier.This is why non-white posters get tired...
I'll assume you two aren't just trying to be funny but I'm also not patient enough to humor this line of thought in this thread.
The responses you quoted weren't being dismissive. They were criticism of a real thing and then you come and try to handwave it away too. I understand that you and countless of others have been through a lot because of stereotypical depictions like Apu in the show. But it doesn't make the pain felt by others any lesser. I agree with the criticism of the show, not dismissing it. And I'm not saying that this is necessarily the thread to talk about other stereotypes in Simpsons or media overall. Yet that doesn't mean I wouldn't call out problematic views that are presented in the thread, it shouldn't go unchallenged. I didn't respond to the person who brought up Willie, that wasn't the discussion I wanted to have in this thread. But the rather direct implication that global media should be viewed just through US lens, is definitely Americentrism. Americentrism and American exceptionalism are both issues. Not the discussion to have on this thread, but I feel I had to respond again because of the continuous dismissal of it. It's larger issue than just Simpsons and the Scottish.
If people just went "yeah that's bad too" or "not the thread for it" and continued with the topic (or just didn't reply to that at all), that would be better than dismissing it as not an issue because it's not perceived in the US. There's several responses one can make to something that they feel is a derail of the topic, which doesn't include the denial of harm felt by ethnic groups around the world.
There's no need to start "opression olympics". You clearly are already aware of the issues of discrimination and mockery of the Scottish. If it's more or less than some other group, isn't at all relevant. And being "white passing" is something that wildly also differs from country to country. Often racism has nothing to do with skin color at all, it's aimed at ethnicity or religion. You wouldn't say to a white Jewish person "what you're complaining about, youre' white" (I hope). In my country, there isn't really much towards Scottish fortunately. Yet there's a lot of russophobia, anti-slavic racism, racism towards Finnish Kale (Romani), racism towards the indigenous Sami people. And of course racism towards anyone who is black or brown and especially Somalian. Somali has turned into a slur here when coming from the lips of racist white people, there isn't even separate slur needed anymore. You can call anyone a Somali with certain tone and they know you're being insulting and discriminatory. To you these people are probably white, but to a Finn they are "mustalainen". Musta means black. It sickens me how often racism gets dismissed and downplayed here, if the victim isn't dark enough.Can you give some examples of systemic, global racism against Scottish people? Comparable to Indian people in the diaspora (and within India too honestly) who experience systemic racism and feel the brunt of white supremacy globally, I don't think you can really equivocate between the two.
Is there a history of mistreatment of Scottish people in the UK? Absolutely. Does that manifest outwardly into systemic violence and racism, on a global scale comparable to how Indian and other decidedly non-white groups experience violence and racism? I don't think the evidence favors that. It's a very specific strain of history within the UK, that should be addressed, but when you look at it globally, Scottish people are generally welcomed into whiteness, and that simply means the dynamics of racism at play here are not equivalent. (Similarly, Willie just isn't seen as representative of his race as Apu is by white audiences; how many stories are there of Scottish people being called Groundskeeper Willie mockingly?)
nahi'll never understand why the Apu stuff gets so much attention but I never hear anything about other stereotypes that were portrayed in a much more negative light(Groundskeeper Willy comes to mind)
There's no need to start "opression olympics". You clearly are already aware of the issues of discrimination and mockery of the Scottish. If it's more or less than some other group, isn't at all relevant. And being "white passing" is something that wildly also differs from country to country. Often racism has nothing to do with skin color at all, it's aimed at ethnicity or religion. You wouldn't say to a Jewish person "what you're complaining about, youre' white" (I hope). In my country, there isn't really much towards Scottish fortunately. Yet there's a lot of russophobia, anti-slavic racism, racism towards Finnish Kale (Romani), racism towards the indigenous Sami people. And of course racism towards anyone who is black or brown and especially Somalian. Somali has turned into a slur here when coming from the lips of white people, there isn't even separate slur needed anymore. To you these people are probably white, but to a Finn they are "mustalainen". Musta means black.
I really don't want to get into an argument which is worse Apu or Willie, because that's not what I was challenging. I was challenging the notion that "not in the US, so not a problem". But sure Apu has been more harmful in larger scale than Willie. But I'm not here to discuss Willie.
Well of course not they're all white, but even white Jewish people suffer from antisemitism. That was the point. And I never claimed that the portrayal of Willie would had caused as much pain in as large scale as Apu. Probably not considering how many Indian people there are compared and how the stereotype of Apu keeps repeated in several other media. That wasn't the point either. It's frustrating when I try to be specific and clear as possible about things, yet it feels that some are even intentionally trying to read something else from what I've said. Like as if I was implying that all Jewish people are white or that I'm equating Apu and Willie. When I didn't originally mention either in my post, but directly responded to something said in this thread that is problematic. I've tried very hard to put emphasis on what the issue was with the posts. But I edited in my post now, that I mean white Jewish person. I thought the implication was already there in that sentence. There are blind spots on this forum, it atleast comes up in discussions of racism (or ethnic discrimination if you want), fat-shaming, child abuse and ableism. Some shit just doesn't get called out like it should or is even directly dismissed.I'm Jewish. Not all Jewish people are white or white-passing, just FYI.
There's definitely specific racisms against some "white" groups depending on country and context, and none of those are okay. But it's just a different scope when you're talking about groups that suffer under global white supremacy, and that will affect how people talk about the issues. That's all I was getting at. So fair enough.
The documentarian:Didn't Hank Azaria refuse to even speak to the documentary guy?
Honestly its a little late to be apologising.
Yeah, it's like fucking clockwork: any thread about the shit that non-White people go through will eventually have a White person pipe up, "WhItE pEoPlE hAvE sUfFeRrEd ToO!"Are people seriously arguing the supposed anti Scottish portrayed in Willie is anything near the scale of racism and stereotyping towards Indians portrayed by Apu and Indian culture over the years?
Yeah, it like fucking clockwork: any thread about the shit that non-White people go through will eventually have a White person pipe up, "WhItE pEoPlE hAvE sUfFeRrEd ToO!"
Tonedeaf AF.
The Apu character was a blatant slur, and no doubt was the cause of so much racism and hurt. Im so sorry that you got bullied in school - the show has a lot to answer for.
However, my response was to a post that really dismissed the Anti-Scottish aspect of the show.
Olubode said " Why would I consider "anti-Scottish racism/violence in America" as something to think about? "
I and other posters were pointing out that actually, the show is global. And the horrible racism you endured at school was mirrored by Scottish children. We shouldn't just be talking about the APU character, but Groundskeeper WIlly also.
I and the other forum member who posted such, were not partaking in "whataboutism", it's VERY clear that we are not dismissing criticisms but adding to the valid criticisms of the show and responding to a forum members opinon.
The Apu character was a racist slur
The Willy character was a racist slur.
But I concede that they deserve separate threads.
There's not really a thread to be had on the Groundskeeper Willy thing, because it's largely not a thing. It's something non-Scottish people use to be dismissive of the Apu issue, whereas Scottish people largely find Groundskeeper Willy a funny character that plays on harmless stereotypes. Unlike Apu.The Apu character was a blatant slur, and no doubt was the cause of so much racism and hurt. Im so sorry that you got bullied in school - the show has a lot to answer for.
However, my response was to a post that really dismissed the Anti-Scottish aspect of the show.
Olubode said " Why would I consider "anti-Scottish racism/violence in America" as something to think about? "
I and other posters were pointing out that actually, the show is global. And the horrible racism you endured at school was mirrored by Scottish children. We shouldn't just be talking about the APU character, but Groundskeeper WIlly also.
I and the other forum member who posted such, were not partaking in "whataboutism", it's VERY clear that we are not dismissing criticisms but adding to the valid criticisms of the show and responding to a forum members opinon.
The Apu character was a racist slur
The Willy character was a racist slur.
But I concede that they deserve separate threads.
Could you link to some stories on this? I can't seem to find any in a cursory search.I and other posters were pointing out that actually, the show is global. And the horrible racism you endured at school was mirrored by Scottish children.
My post was in response to someone asking about racism in America. Did you miss that? Thats really fucking odd that you jumped to belittle me when I was giving an on topic response.You do realise that The Simpsons gets broadcast around the world don't you?
Your post seems to dismiss other racism just because it doesn't affect your personal small bubble
i'll never understand why the Apu stuff gets so much attention but I never hear anything about other stereotypes that were portrayed in a much more negative light(Groundskeeper Willy comes to mind)
These are obtuse responses. Indian-American kids like me got bullied and had Apu thrown in our faces. It sucks having to explain to people that I don't worship cows.
Not all the stereotypes effected people in the same way. It has nothing to do with Americentrism. If those Scottish stereotypes had adverse effects in other countries then we can talk about that. However, you can't use those other stereotypes in the show to whataboutism criticism about how Indian-American stereotypes effect Indian-Americans away. That's something I've noticed people trying to do to dismiss criticisms of the show.
i haven't watched simpsons in years, so what ended up happening in show? replaced by a new character by a new VA? Still Indian (but matching VA now)? I vaguely remember he had a cousin or something.
This is where I'm currently standing. I'm not Indian so my feelings on this particular matter are inconsequential, but I do understand the pain of of being made fun of with pop culture references, and it especially hurts when you're a kid. And there aren't many Indian characters I can think of in American media, so for a long time it must have seemed like Apu was the only semblance of representation one could get.It sucks because Apu is a really great character and has lots of good classic episodes where he was involved (Be Sharps immediately come to mind). I have lots good memories of the character thinking back (he's a kind, hardworking guy with a good sense of humor). But obviously he was also portrayed in a stereotypical manner that caused lots of hurt for people.
Agreed! This is an expandable skill that requires both civility and empathy.As a white person, I agree. There's certainly room for discussion on the many forms of prejudice that infect our society, but we need to learn when and how to bring things up.
If he's OK with continuing to apologise until other people recognise there was an issue and follow suit, good for him.i thought he apologized like years ago, and wasn't he replaced also? it's alright dude, you weren't an SS soldier come on.
It sucks because Apu is a really great character and has lots of good classic episodes where he was involved (Be Sharps immediately come to mind). I have lots good memories of the character thinking back (he's a kind, hardworking guy with a good sense of humor). But obviously he was also portrayed in a stereotypical manner that caused lots of hurt for people.
I just read a short article that Groening has "ambitious" plans for the character. I wonder if it could be a spin off show? Maybe he's just saying they will hire an Indian actor to voice Apu and give him a bigger role in the modern day show.
I'm actually just learning about the recasting of characters now. Does that mean characters like Carl have new voices? Very interesting.Throughout this 5+ year saga Hank has arguably acquitted himself far better than anyone else has on this issue.
Frankly, he's the reason why Apu is no longer being characterized in the offensive manner that he was for the first 27 seasons of the show that clearly offended and hurt a great many people. He's also the reason why the show finally took steps to recast ALL of their non-white characters and broadening out to a more diverse voice actor pool. They would not have taken these steps had Azaria not forced the issue and it was Kondabolu's documentary that got the ball rolling on this.
And when I say better than anyone else, I mean better than anyone else. That goes for Kondabolu himself. That certainly goes for the Simpsons' producers and creative talent. And that most assuredly goes for the show's fans online.
Kumiki, Carl and Dr Hibbert so far.I'm actually just learning about the recasting of characters now. Does that mean characters like Carl have new voices? Very interesting.
Edit; Alex Désert who does Carl also does Lou. And Eric Lopez does Bumblebee Man now.
UPDATE 1: Alex Désert has been cast to voice Carl Carlson and Lou the Cop beginning with Undercover Burns. (Variety.com)
UPDATE 2: Eric Lopez has been cast to voice Bumblebee Man beginning with Now Museum, Now You Don't. (@AlJean on Twitter)
UPDATE 3: Jenny Yokobori has been cast to voice Kumiko Albertson beginning with The Dad-Feelings Limited. (TheFutonCritic.com)
UPDATE 4: Kevin Michael Richardson has been cast to voice Dr. Julius Hibbert beginning with Wad Goals. (Mirror.co.uk)
UPDATE 5: Kimberly Brooks has been cast to voice Lewis beginning with Wad Goals.
UPDATE 6: Megan Mullally has been cast to voice Sarah Wiggum beginning with Uncut Femmes. (@MattSelman on Twitter)
UPDATE 7: Tony Rodriguez has been cast to voice Julio beginning with Uncut Femmes. (@MattSelman on Twitter)
UPDATE 8: Dawnn Lewis has been cast to voice Bernice Hibbert beginning with Uncut Femmes.
A lot of sitcoms are doing this the last year. Started with Big Mouth.Even though I don't watch The Simpsons anymore, this + Hank apologizing and actually wanting to be better regarding his role in perpetrating a stereotype is good shit.
If only everyone in the world were like this, we'd have way less to deal with.
He detailed a story about how he had gone to speak at his son's school and how a 17-year-old boy — who had never seen The Simpsons but knew about Apu — came up to him with tears in his eyes because of how he'd seen himself represented.