• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Oct 12, 2020
8,860
Just woke up here on the West Coast to see the review consensus. Pretty much how I expected it it to be. Well, my official prediction was an 85 Meta. Given the circumstances around Halo Infinite's development an 87 is an EXCELLENT SCORE.

Now I need to decide how many reviews I'm going to allow myself to read. Can't wait to play this Wednesday.

Saw that Youtuber extraordinare Rand al Thor had extremely high praise for it, saying it might be his personal GOTY. That's probably all I need to know.
 

UltimateHigh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,500
shame about the story complaints. it sounds like it ends right when it gets more interesting narratively.
 

Ocarina_117

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,562
So is this still a case of the game being a platform for expansions to drop?

Or will we see subsequent sequels?
 

Guerrilla

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,235
I thought the game could crack the 90+MC, but good scores anyway.
Me too, but I think Halo just might never again be able to crack that 90, no matter how good it is. Expectations for Halo are just so different for so many people and some people might never get the appeal of the "30 seconds of fun". Also, no matter how bad one game in the series was (Halo5 wasn't "bad" but certainly not at the franchises peak) The expectations for a new halo are always at absolutely insane levels not matched by the vast majority of games.
 

Scottoest

Member
Feb 4, 2020
11,326
decent? Is that what halo 5 revisionist say now? At the end of the day it's a AAA game on the 7-10 review scale

I love the franchise but 5 was embarrassing

The story sucks, and it's not a particularly great HALO game. As a sci-fi FPS? It's hardly "embarrassing". The combat and level designs are good-to-fine by their own merits, and the multiplayer suite was very good. There wasn't some collective global delusion going on when reviewers saw fit to give it scores in the 80s.

The people who tend to think it's the shittiest garbage ever are Halo fans, who only see it by their criteria of what a good Halo game is. I think it's the worst Halo campaign personally, and it's not close. But for someone less invested in the franchise and without the baggage of those expectations, it was largely just another pretty good sci-fi shooter to them that came and went. Halo deserved more than that, but the game was... fine.
 

onibirdo

Member
Dec 9, 2020
2,336
No, but the story starts in medias res and fills in a lot as you go along. Some of the terms thrown around might be confusing, but nothing old's really relevant to the plot except for Cortana's rebellion and what a Halo is, and those get explained.
Good to hear, thanks.

I started watching the Halo story recap by IGN but gave up half way scratching my head.
Just point me at the guys I need to shoot thankyouverymuch.
 

Banamy

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,402
Me too, but I think Halo just might never again be able to crack that 90, no matter how good it is. Expectations for Halo are just so different for so many people and some people might never get the appeal of the "30 seconds of fun". Also, no matter how bad one game in the series was (Halo5 wasn't "bad" but certainly not at the franchises peak) The expectations for a new halo are always at absolutely insane levels not matched by the vast majority of games.
To be fair, hitting 90 for an fps is extremely difficult in modern gaming. I can't even remember the last FPS to hit 90.
 

TooBusyLookinGud

Graphics Engineer
Verified
Oct 27, 2017
7,937
California
Great scores but I don't want to read the reviews. Have they stated how long it is?

Edit: 12+ hours.
I use the GP on PC often and I haven't had any issues. Just remember to leverage the Windows Store app if you have issues because it's the main driver for the GP app. Never install anything on the drive your OS is on. That goes for everything and not just games.
 
Last edited:

Nintenleo

Member
Nov 9, 2017
4,209
Italy
Me too, but I think Halo just might never again be able to crack that 90, no matter how good it is. Expectations for Halo are just so different for so many people and some people might never get the appeal of the "30 seconds of fun". Also, no matter how bad one game in the series was (Halo5 wasn't "bad" but certainly not at the franchises peak) The expectations for a new halo are always at absolutely insane levels not matched by the vast majority of games.

In this case, I think it was mostly held back by the absence of campaign co-op. Gameplay-wise this game is getting universal acclaim.
 

Dancrane212

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,962
12+hours for quick normal run with just main missions
aprox 25h for 80% completion on normal
approx 30+h for 65% completion on heroic

Oh lordy. I'd been keeping my head down when it comes to campaign coverage since the reveal last year—I assumed we were getting 12 hours at most. So much for the holiday vacation taking down 2-3 games off the backlog haha.
 

Skywalker333

Senior Video Games Editor
Verified
Jun 9, 2020
268
Oh lordy. I'd been keeping my head down when it comes to campaign coverage since the reveal last year—I assumed we were getting 12 hours at most. So much for the holiday vacation taking down 2-3 games off the backlog haha.

to be honest, seeing what other colleagues said, I might be one of the slowest ones :P
i tend to play very methodically and busying around so I assume someone who is more target oriented will finish it a fair bit faster.
But in my eyes, its at least double the size than any of the older ones.
 
Oct 28, 2017
5,849
I never played Halo 5. Should I play that one beforehand or is it not that important? I know we don't know plot details but I completely forgot what happened in 4, I only played it when it released.
 

Mr.Deadshot

Member
Oct 27, 2017
20,285
To be fair, hitting 90 for an fps is extremely difficult in modern gaming. I can't even remember the last FPS to hit 90.
Half-Life: Alyx is sitting at 93 Metascore.

It is not more difficult than any other genre. It feels more like no one is seriously trying. Halo is the first big AAA FPS in a while that isn't another COD/Battlefield/FarCry ... These franchise just feel way too familiar to really shake up things.

Both Deathloop and DUSK were close enough though. But probably a bit too niche, in the end, to really breakthrough.
 

Blue Ninja

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,755
Belgium
to be honest, seeing what other colleagues said, I might be one of the slowest ones :P
i tend to play very methodically and busying around so I assume someone who is more target oriented will finish it a fair bit faster.
But in my eyes, its at least double the size than any of the older ones.
I'm more of a guns-blazing, improvise-adapt-overcome player, so that probably shaved off a lot of my game time. I only bothered getting power weapons and vehicles for the final mission and a few of the HVT's.
I never played Halo 5. Should I play that one beforehand or is it not that important? I know we don't know plot details but I completely forgot what happened in 4, I only played it when it released.
Part of Halo 5's plot is pretty important, but they do cover most of what happened as you're playing. If you don't remember 4, just playing 5 won't help much. :lol
 

jem

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,757
decent? Is that what halo 5 revisionist say now? At the end of the day it's a AAA game on the 7-10 review scale

I love the franchise but 5 was embarrassing
Halo 5 had a messy story but it still played very well and the MP was superb. It absolutely deserved the review scores it got.
 

MadScientist

Member
Oct 27, 2017
917
Great scores but I don't want to read the reviews. Have they stated how long it is?

Edit: 12+ hours.

I use the GP on PC often and I haven't had any issues. Just remember to leverage the Windows Store app if you have issues because it's the main driver for the GP app. Never install anything on the drive your OS is on. That goes for everything and not just games.

Thanks. My OS is on my 1TB NVME and that's where I would prefer to play my games, on the fast SSD. I know many haven't had issues with GP on PC, but when you read that thread it makes me want to stay far away from it until it's fixed...
 

Prine

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,724
I never played Halo 5. Should I play that one beforehand or is it not that important? I know we don't know plot details but I completely forgot what happened in 4, I only played it when it released.
Avoid 5 imo, watch the cliff notes and go straight into Infinite.
 

Zor

Member
Oct 30, 2017
11,321
The story sucks, and it's not a particularly great HALO game. As a sci-fi FPS? It's hardly "embarrassing". The combat and level designs are good-to-fine by their own merits, and the multiplayer suite was very good. There wasn't some collective global delusion going on when reviewers saw fit to give it scores in the 80s.

The people who tend to think it's the shittiest garbage ever are Halo fans, who only see it by their criteria of what a good Halo game is. I think it's the worst Halo campaign personally, and it's not close. But for someone less invested in the franchise and without the baggage of those expectations, it was largely just another pretty good sci-fi shooter to them that came and went. Halo deserved more than that, but the game was... fine.

Yeah, all of this basically. I too think it's the worst Halo campaign, but a good shooter on its own. The stuff it fumbles with character and story are a real shame as a lifelong fan of the franchise, but the moment to moment gameplay is legit fun.

It's amazing how there's seemingly rarely any nuance with this stuff...
 

Snake Eater

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
11,385
Is heroic difficulty still the "meant to be played" difficultly like it was for the Bungie games?
 

kmfdmpig

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
19,347
The Giantbomb review is spectacular (but not because it's a Halo review).

I think has finally convinced me to figure out the cheapest way to get GamePass. I have a 10+ year old computer and no XBox capable of doing GamePass. What are my options here? Anyone done that analysis yet? I'm betting it's getting an older Xbox? Don't know if I have it in me to build another computer again (both for time, and money reasons).

Also, Good job 343. Hopefully you guys get some rest.
It doesn't work out to the cheapest over the course of years but if you mean cheapest in the short-term then All-Access might be worth looking into. It's basically a subscription that nets you a console and Gamepass.
 

idioteque

Member
Nov 8, 2017
613
I mean it has a considerably better rating than BF2042 and COD:Vanguard.

I genuinely didn't think I'd be saying that a year ago.
 

Irrotational

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,134
I thought the game could crack the 90+MC, but good scores anyway.
Me too - i'm weirdly dissappointed with an 87 even though it's got nothing to do with me and isn't going to change the game or how i play it and how much i personally enjoy it.

The psychological impact of numbers is weird...
 

Scottoest

Member
Feb 4, 2020
11,326
Yeah, all of this basically. I too think it's the worst Halo campaign, but a good shooter on its own. The stuff it fumbles with character and story are a real shame as a lifelong fan of the franchise, but the moment to moment gameplay is legit fun.

It's amazing how there's seemingly rarely any nuance with this stuff...

I think the decline of Halo's popularity at the time, six long years with no game to change the narrative, and the internet... being the internet... is what led to the spiraling hyperbole about how it's an embarrassing software trash fire, and not just a decent-but-very-flawed sci-fi shooter that wasn't what Halo fans were really looking for by and large.
 

J_ToSaveTheDay

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
18,787
USA
Not gonna lie, this looks kind of like a dream game to me. Expanding the wide-linear old sections to an even wider space with dips into more linear structures from time to time, with Halo's signature feel of guns and enemy AI sprinkled throughout.

I do hope it receives some technical updates as after watching the DF video, it feels like this game isn't quite maximizing its technical potential. Wanna see some of the weird animation refresh async get addressed, and maybe implement some long-distance shadow detail back into the world. None of this is enough to kill any of my hype as the game's design just looks very, very fun and appealing, but it would be nice to get this looking even better with further development on Series X.
 

DarthWalden

Prophet of Truth
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
6,030
That Giant Bomb review is really funny and interesting to me.

It's like barely a review of the game at all and more just an op-ed of the state of the industry how a big tentpole title is launching into gamepass and whether reviews even matter now because people can just play it for basically nothing and make their own opinion.
 

chrominance

Sky Van Gogh
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,576
Possibly a really stupid question: do any reviews talk about how the game plays with mouse and keyboard? I'm not terribly concerned or anything but it would be nice to play this on PC and I realized I haven't played a Halo on PC since the original Combat Evolved back in the day. I was kind of expecting to see something in the PC Gamer review at least but didn't see anything obvious.

Maybe I'll just find out for myself at some point; in theory I still have to play Halo 5 (which sounds pretty much mandatory), which I'll have to do on Xbox, and Halo 2 (probably not as important), which I assume will give me a decent idea of how M/KB feels.
 

Shrennin

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,680
Just noticed that DOOM Eternal and Halo Infinite have very close scores actually.

Which I think shows the quality of Infinite. I'm glad for 343 :D

Is heroic difficulty still the "meant to be played" difficultly like it was for the Bungie games?

So even for 343 games this was the case, until Infinite. With Infinite, normal is the mode that's "meant to be played" or rather that the game is tuned for.
 

Arn

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 28, 2017
5,726
Half-Life: Alyx is sitting at 93 Metascore.

It is not more difficult than any other genre. It feels more like no one is seriously trying. Halo is the first big AAA FPS in a while that isn't another COD/Battlefield/FarCry ... These franchise just feel way too familiar to really shake up things.

Both Deathloop and DUSK were close enough though. But probably a bit too niche, in the end, to really breakthrough.
If the only example that can be used is a platform-defining game built entirely for high-end hardware then I think it kind of proves the point.

There's enough variety and quality in the space, with the likes of Deathloop, Doom & Eternal and Prey, but since the start of last generation it feels increasingly difficult for the genre to top 90 across an average review score. I think the generation before it was much easier to hit that target. Even Bioshock Infinite is sat on 96 on Metacritic.
 

vixolus

Prophet of Truth
Member
Sep 22, 2020
54,276
Possibly a really stupid question: do any reviews talk about how the game plays with mouse and keyboard? I'm not terribly concerned or anything but it would be nice to play this on PC and I realized I haven't played a Halo on PC since the original Combat Evolved back in the day. I was kind of expecting to see something in the PC Gamer review at least but didn't see anything obvious.

Maybe I'll just find out for myself at some point; in theory I still have to play Halo 5 (which sounds pretty much mandatory), which I'll have to do on Xbox, and Halo 2 (probably not as important), which I assume will give me a decent idea of how M/KB feels.
Feels great on mkb
 

Odesu

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,537
Is heroic difficulty still the "meant to be played" difficultly like it was for the Bungie games?

The game is largely pretty easy on heroic with some HUGE difficulty spikes. I was way, way more frustrated at points on heroic than I ever was in any other halo game. Would honestly advice to start on normal for a first playthrough.
 

Qudi

Member
Jul 26, 2018
5,317
Did you play the game?
The game is not perfect as the scores and reviews suggests. Some could be minor or major depending on the person and if you can overlook them or not. As i said im going off the review by Robin from Hooked because his opinion on the Halo franchise is inline with my expierence of the past games. You are free to agree or disagree and explain why im wrong. But i dont expect a serious respond from someone who uses "yikes" .

Possibly a really stupid question: do any reviews talk about how the game plays with mouse and keyboard? I'm not terribly concerned or anything but it would be nice to play this on PC and I realized I haven't played a Halo on PC since the original Combat Evolved back in the day. I was kind of expecting to see something in the PC Gamer review at least but didn't see anything obvious.

Maybe I'll just find out for myself at some point; in theory I still have to play Halo 5 (which sounds pretty much mandatory), which I'll have to do on Xbox, and Halo 2 (probably not as important), which I assume will give me a decent idea of how M/KB feels.
review codes were only for xbox consoles iirc
BUT u can simply try out the free multiplayer experience. Basically the same gadets, weapons and movesets. Imo Halo never felt better on PC than in Infinite.
 
Last edited:

Garrett 2U

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,511
That is a really good score, considering the delayed features and multiplayer controversies. The multiplayer gameplay is amazing, I am looking forward to the campaign! This is so exciting as a Halo fan.
 

Anno

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,950
Columbus, Ohio
Thats a VR game with dedicated hardware and controls, not an experience to compare to I'd say, prior to that was Overwatch.

Ok? I just think that's the kind of separation it's going to take to get 90+ on a shooter.

How many total reviews did HL:A get versus a typical AAA FPS? I know for a lot that played it, it was their GOTY, but fewer have played it.

Fewer than most, for sure. But enough that I think it's representative. Currently 74 on OC.
 

tapedeck

Member
Oct 28, 2017
7,976
I think I'm gonna have to bite the bullet and get a storage expansion card…there is THAT much stuff I'm currently playing on Series X that I don't want to put on a usb hard disk..and it's only gonna get worse in a few months.
 

DanielG123

Member
Jul 14, 2020
2,490
Looks like 343 fucking nailed it with the campaign. I mean, they already did with Halo 4's, imo, but after everything that's happened with Infinite, and the fiasco with Halo 5's story, this is nothing but great news. Amazing job, everyone at 343; I can't wait to jump back into the boots of Chief on Wednesday.
 

Kittenz

Member
Oct 28, 2017
3,156
Minneapolis
To be fair, hitting 90 for an fps is extremely difficult in modern gaming. I can't even remember the last FPS to hit 90.
If I'm not mistaken, Doom Eternal and Apex Legends are the only new FPS to score as well since Overwatch in 2016, and neither broke 90.

It's almost impossible for an FPS to hit 90+ for whatever reason. In fact, in the past 20 years, there's only about 40 or so according to Metacritic that have hit 90+ as new titles, and they're almost all from 5 franchises: Halo, Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Half-Life and Bioshock. Throw in Metroid Prime, Overwatch and that's about it. And virtually all of them are 360/PS3 gen or earlier.

I mean, this whole year, only 3 brand new games total hit 90, iirc: Psychonauts, Forza Horizon 5, and Chicory.

Any Halo fans disappointed in high 80s maybe have their expectations set a bit unrealistically.
 

dudu0609

Prophet of Regret
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,403
I always respect the reviewers' opinions/takes on games which I look forward to, even they are hot takes.
But the review from Ars Technica really surprised me.
How come that reviewer concluded Halo Infinite is a fine rental or just a 1month game pass game???!!!
And I have read the review twice. It made me feel the guy played a total different game.
 

Yerffej

Prophet of Regret
Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,496
That Giant Bomb review is really funny and interesting to me.

It's like barely a review of the game at all and more just an op-ed of the state of the industry how a big tentpole title is launching into gamepass and whether reviews even matter now because people can just play it for basically nothing and make their own opinion.
When they haven't done a review in over a year, it's probably worth addressing from his end. I agree with him overall. In the traditional sense, I find them a relic of a bygone era. He's spot on in that anyone who clicked on his "review" already knew whether they wanted to give the game a shot.