I believe you are correct. As soon as they showed the Xbox One footage I was like... That's 30fps! Maybe they captured it at that frame rate by mistake (not sure on this one), or maybe they've made a change and prev-gen will run at a lower framerate so that they can bump up graphical settings. Parts of the community were calling for this change when the singleplayer demo was shown and the graphics were slated.
Didn't even say anything. Just posted it so it can be seen again.
Halo 3, I think, the best Halo game, so looking to it as a goal or source of inspiration is the best thing you can do in my opinion. Especially for campaign: Halo 3's campaign was the best. Those encounters, man.
This is the first time I've seen this and it's probably the best thing I'll see all weekend.
halo 5 in general, is not viewed as an improvement on core halo. Its a good multiplayer, but generally not seen as a good halo game. They needed to take a step back as going forward in a player-centric direction from a gameplay standpoint, risks doing further harm to the series. Halo isnt about player-centric gameplay.
its more of a "too much info" kind of thing. With markers, nades begin to be used as a scouting tool which causes ridiculous amounts of nade spam. In social its whatever, in comp is kind of ruins the actual skill usage of nades (their ability to counter and such). Markers being off in comp is a good decision.
the H5 pistol outclassed basically everything. You could play an entire match without swapping weapons, thus not engaging in the sandbox. IMO they should never introduce that pistol again.
I mean, Halo 3 is by far the most populated playlist in MCC on all the platforms.
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT
They explained the reason why is as it stands in the current gameplay loop of infinite it did not fit. In Halo 5 you can actually turn it off and most pro players always had it off. Anytime I went for assassinations I was always killed almost immediately. You are too exposed when that animation occurs. I think they are still cool, but I understand their decision. They can still come back. Just not right away.
That's how it should be. Gives the attacking player the necessary information to whether or not make a push.
by that logic the BR should have been removed over a decade ago
All the Halo 5 weapons were useful and felt fun to use. Until pros complained and then it just became a pistol fest. I think it would have been better if they had a pro balance and a casual balance. I know that's hard to do but I think it would have been better for more casual players.
This seems like a nitpick for nitpick's sake. They were in Halo 4 and Halo 5 and it was fine. It encourages players to push if they know their grenade hit, sure, but the expectation is that once you're hit by a grenade, you're rushing away to take cover and heal up anyways. It doesn't change the flow of combat too much.
Nah, you shouldn't get to basically have x-ray vision just by lobbing a grenade.
I don't see how that makes sense considering that's been the usual risk with assassinations ever since Reach. Halo 5 was already pretty much the fastest-paced MP in the series (maybe just a bit slower than 4?), so unless the pace is upped significantly in Infinite to the point where the game plays like COD, I don't see how they still can't fit?
The problem with nade hitmarkers is that it greatly oversimplifies that process. You're getting what is essentially free information on another player's position off of a relatively low-risk option. You're not keeping track of what weapons have been picked up and when, you're not communicating with your team in order stay on top of where the enemy team is located, you're not coordinating pushes based on hearing a shield pop through audio cues, you're just seeing the little tick marks around your reticle and pushing based solely on that. Free information is not good in a multiplayer game.
