Yo what the fuck. This spoilers or not? Fucking get that thread title marked.
For what it's worth, they said from the get-go that the intention was a two-film story, and initially they were going to film back-to-back, but held off in case this film flopped at the box office. It has enough finality in the end just in case that happened.Just saw it. Thought it was pretty good. Loved all the callbacks, homages and subversions of the original.
Was annoyed atsequel bait ending though. I feel like a sequel would just be another resurrection. I mean c'mon, he's trapped in the basement, but they show the basement again and he's not there. It's obvious where they're going with this.
I'm pretty sure that's the intention, like I said. They want to tell the second part of this story.This film was made for about 10 million, not counting advertising.
It's on track to make between 55 - 70 million this weekend alone.
Yeah, we're getting a sequel. :)
I just hope they get the same people to work on it.
I did? Hence my post?
Don't get the comedy hate part, there is like two scenes only that are played up for laughs. People are making this sound like it was a comedy
Honestly kinda surprised this got so much praise. I thought parts of it were close to terrible while other parts were very, very good. I'd say it's about a 6.5/10.
Firstly most of the new characters are totally flat and boring. Nobody cares about Laurie having a granddaughter and it would've been way more interesting to streamline the focus on Laurie and her daughter. Because the inane high school banter in this film was fucking TERRIBLE. The awkward high school nerd should've been cut completely.
I also thought a few of the death scenes were a little too Scary Movie-esque for their own goodthe girl slipping over and the guy getting caught on the rail
By far the most baffling element wasNew Loomis becoming a murderer. It felt so lazy and tacked on to keep the story going even though it was effectively dispatched like 3 minutes later. Laaame
The third act was by far the best part of the movie, I was super tense for the finale.I loved the trap reveal though it ultimately feels incredibly hollow because Halloween 2 will inevitably reveal he managed to slip away somehow. Yaaaawwwn. If this was the true end of the series and we saw Michael get melted before our eyes that would've been incredible
Laurie and Myers were done a very solid treatment, the music was dope...but I feel like the script let it down somewhat. Too much ordinariness, too much focus on the wrong things and some straight-up dumb dialogue like the journalist woman talking about going for a poo and the weird peanut butter jokes.
By far the most baffling element wasNew Loomis becoming a murderer. It felt so lazy and tacked on to keep the story going even though it was effectively dispatched like 3 minutes later. Laaame
For what it's worth, they said from the get-go that the intention was a two-film story, and initially they were going to film back-to-back, but held off in case this film flopped at the box office. It has enough finality in the end just in case that happened.
As it stands, I think the sequel is almost guaranteed now.
?????
?????
That's what they said the intention was for this new revival months ago.
I thought that at first too but when you consider how obsessed with Michael Loomis was in the original film, the idea of his successor losing himself in that obsession actually makes sense.
The studio probably will, but I believe the team behind this in their intention and goal.If you believe that I've got some shit to sell you. They milking this as long as they can.
Yes, but I also think that people are slightly misinterpreting him. I don't think he was "pure evil", but he thought that there was some 'larger' element to Michael, and that some collateral damage will be necessary for "the greater good", and I think this parallels Laurie's character well. I think he kills the officer because he knows that there's already a body count and he's trying to genuinely understand the psyche, reasoning/motivation for Michael Myers, to the point where he's beyond obsessed, he's deranged.
And yes, I think this makes perfect sense for a Loomis long-term protege.
I'm actually a little bit surprised there's as much negativity as there is. I pretty much fully agree with that early linked Rossatron video. I think I might go see this again tonight. I've been hyped ever since I got out of seeing it last night. I can't stop thinking about it and wanting to talk about it haha. Excited for more people to see it and get in on the discussion!
Oh I agree entirely.
The fact that Michael crushes his skull without a moment's hesitation indicates he was just a tourist trying to understand something far beyond his capability.
I went with my best friend last night and the original is - bar none - his favorite film and he thinks this movie is equally good even if it's not nearly as seminal and influential.
I'm also a huge fan and I would call this not only the best Halloween sequel but one of the best horror film of the last decade.
Since Scream? From my perspective, it's just this and Scream 4, for different reasons, obviously, though both tackling similar material.We have to have a real conversation about the slasher genre. How many genuinely great slashers have there been, especially since SCREAM? List is probably super short. When you say something like "best Slasher since SCREAM," people may roll their eyes, but if you look at the releases since then... maybe not so crazy.
I have to see it a few more times though, I'll probably go see it in theaters once more too.
We have to have a real conversation about the slasher genre. How many genuinely great slashers have there been, especially since SCREAM? List is probably super short. When you say something like "best Slasher since SCREAM," people may roll their eyes, but if you look at the releases since then... maybe not so crazy.
I have to see it a few more times though, I'll probably go see it in theaters once more too.
That's exactly how I read itAm I the only one that....
...thought Laurie had different reactions to seeing Michael with and without the mask on?
Like when she sees the bus and the diner scene after she's like "I saw him" and is crying and losing her mind because of the PTSD but when she shoots through the window of the house and sees him in the mirror it's more like a "holy fucking shit" type of reaction and fear kicks in.
Like he's the same guy but seeing the "human" version of him inspires a different reaction opposed to the mask...
I could be super psycho analyzing this lol but I really took it as such and thought it was really well done in adding to both Laurie and Michael's characters...
We have to have a real conversation about the slasher genre. How many genuinely great slashers have there been, especially since SCREAM? List is probably super short. When you say something like "best Slasher since SCREAM," people may roll their eyes, but if you look at the releases since then... maybe not so crazy.
I have to see it a few more times though, I'll probably go see it in theaters once more too.
The running theory is that a slasher villain's weapon is a stand-in for his masculinity (penis), so him getting the knife back has some strong connotations to it.Is it me or did Michael feel like every time he got a piece of his attire he got stronger. I need my jumpsuit, mask, and kitchen knife I'm ready to go. Beginning of movie felt like he was getting infinity stones.
I need to rewatch Scream 4. I found it pretty unmemorable but a lot of people continue to sing it's praises.
It's one of the best slasher sequels. It tackles a lot of interesting issues with regards to the effects on a community and individuals years after the fact.I need to rewatch Scream 4. I found it pretty unmemorable but a lot of people continue to sing it's praises.
It's one of the best slasher sequels. It tackles a lot of interesting issues with regards to the effects on a community and individuals years after the fact.
This film is better than SCREAM 2. The ending of SCREAM 2 is so fucking lame, lol.
Scream 2 is a fine enough film, but I wouldn't call it good or great. Better than 3, for sure, though.
I know a lot of people don't like how "stupid" the characters were (it didn't bother me but I wasn't expecting anything less) but it works to juxtapose against Laurie
She's a crazy old conspiracy lady but she's the only one who knows what the fuck she's doing
Really enjoyed the movie, plays plenty of homage and embraces the typical tropes but has enough modern "self-aware" slasher to it to keep it from feeling dated. I'd watch another but I'd be curious what tricks they'd have up their sleeve, I guess since this is a movie all about preparation the sequel could flip it again to where he's subverting their plans
The Loomis-2 plot totally could have been interesting but like you said, it lasts about 4 minutes and then he's jelly so it doesn't matter at all. What a waste. Could have been developed into something tasty.
I was so disappointed that they wussed out on the ending like that, too. That whole final fight is like the only part of the movie that's worthwhile but they undercut their own ending with their obvious sequel baiting, going out of their way to show him mysteriously absent in the final shots of the room. But I guess the entire premise of this movie starts by undercutting the ending of the original to benefit their sequel so I can't be that surprised. An ending with some amount of finality would have had a lot of impact.
I mean people were laughing the whole babysitter scene juat like busta rhymes wearing the myers costume.For real. Comparing this to Resurrection is wild disrespectful. Nobody is trying to Bruce Lee Myers in this one.
Can't please everyone.