There was 2 elemental demo's, the second one was pretty downgraded but people think of the first generally.
I think people need to limit what to expect from raytracing in the next gen consoles. You simply cannot compare it to what you get on PC right now. especially with the new Ampere GPU's coming this year, the gap will be widened even more before the console generation even begins.
I am sure it will match, even on PC its early days of what to get out of current RTX cards. but to expect generation leaps, raytracing at 4k, is insanity.
Slightly less crazy, but still crazy ;p
It will be a small specialized RT volume that will raytrace the shit of those balls. every wrinkle in the sack will be movie quality.
You can think whatever you want about Avatar from an artistic standpoint, since this is subjective. The graphical fidelity and technology behind the whole thing is incontestable though - if you think otherwise you simply don't understand 3D graphics and rendering techniques at all.
Nah man, i REALLY don't know alot about tech but we're literally getting avatar tier graphics in realtime. :D
Avatar won't be visually topped in video games for the next 100 years. I'd love to be proven wrong.
hmm, give it 15 or so years for the industry to move away from current raytrace rasterisation hybrid solutions to a full raytraced Realtime engine, by then RT acceleration will have advanced a lot and will make it possible to natively run AAA raytraced content. It will def not take 100 years.
polycount.com
What do you think pbr means exactly?
Tensor cores are not involved im ray tracing, you are thinking of the RT core which handle the aabb traversals, ray triangle intersections and reporting of Hits and misses.
Is this website banned on Era? Because the amount of stupid in that shot should be a bannable offense. A few minutes of CGI costs hundreds of thousands of dollars.
🤦♂️ 🤦♂️ 🤦♂️
'Physically Based Rendering' for materials is what I meant, better reproduction of materials than in that trailer.
They did use his likeness. An in game model running in real time will never look as good as a pre-rendered CGI model with insane polycount and detail . Thats all there is to it.
Things are hard to do. Christ what is wrong with people like this?
Control on which GPU? I'd be pleasantly surprised if either console rivals rtx 2060 RT capabilities. RT is why mid gen refreshes or shorter gen cycle make sense this time around.
I don't know what to tell you if you think it doesn't look like him. I disagree.
It's refreshing to read a comment from someone with sense on here
Thats why I called that article trash. Its dated August 2019. Not only comparing CGI to in game model, but using what looks like a youtube compressed screenshot as a basis of that ludicrous comparison as soon as CDPR released the trailer to get clicks.
Why wouldn't you set your sights higher than that? Horizon Zero Dawn NPCs look far better than any NPCs in a PS3/360 game, linear or open, and next gen will be a more comprehensive upgrade.
Generational gap in terms of RT? Possibly. But I'd assume for that to happen, games would need to be designed completely around RT rather than rasterization or a mix of both. Otherwise consoles will still be the base that vast majority of games are built around.
Possibly. We know MS has int4/8 for ML, but there's no dedicated hardware for it so they'd be taking away CUs for the purposes of "dlss". That's my understanding of it at least. It would also probably not be anywhere as good as dlss2.0.
