Wow...
What would happen if say, Twitch moved its HQ to EU or UK or something, would that make that bill useless then? Or no difference?
ah finally the music industry will be saved and all those small music acts will be able to completely live off their music, because of this.
/s
All this does is make streaming more of a straight advertisement and gated behind regulations like TV. You will still have twitch streamers like Ninja who are backed by corporations, but this will kill a lot of smaller content creators who can't get deals.
Ooh, here's a fun near-future science-fiction thought. These kinds of laws could make companies so hesitant to host un-licensed content that merely uploading anything might be handled beforehand with a white list, not afterwards with a black list. What's this mean?
That you need a thumbs up from a higher power for that "stream/upload content" button to be unlocked. So unless your account is vouched by a company, no more streaming everyday shit by default — no one wants to wade through that per-moment licensing nightmare. It's why t-shirts and whatnot get blurred when tv shows shoot behind the scenes material. So instead of handling the impossible amount of content from regular folk, they'll just drape a blanket lockdown. What might be the side effect? Besides reshaping the face of YouTube and Twitch?
Facebook locks down photos and videos from common people. Twitter locks down photos and videos from common people. All public content hosting becomes curated. Personal content is only sent through email or private messages because common content has been de-platformed.
No more mass streaming of protests. No more streaming when you get pulled over.
Not because the government is directly stopping you, but because no one wants to host unapproved data.
Nice and clean, 20 minutes into the cyberpunk dystopia....
Disclaimer: This is entirely speculative fiction and may not be what transpires.
This. The whole point of the law is so corporations can better control and profit off of online media instead of independent sources. Social media, YouTube, twitch, etc were the Wild West where regular people could find success; that success is now locked up behind a wall that only corporations could climb and utilize. It's 100% a play to protect corporations and kill the internet as a revenue source for individuals.Ooh, here's a fun near-future science-fiction thought. These kinds of laws could make companies so hesitant to host un-licensed content that merely uploading anything might be handled beforehand with a white list, not afterwards with a black list. What's this mean?
That you need a thumbs up from a higher power for that "stream/upload content" button to be unlocked. So unless your account is vouched by a company, no more streaming everyday shit by default — no one wants to wade through that per-moment licensing nightmare. It's why t-shirts and whatnot get blurred when tv shows shoot behind the scenes material. So instead of handling the impossible amount of content from regular folk, they'll just drape a blanket lockdown. What might be the side effect? Besides reshaping the face of YouTube and Twitch?
Facebook locks down photos and videos from common people. Twitter locks down photos and videos from common people. All public content hosting becomes curated. Personal content is only sent through email or private messages because common content has been de-platformed.
No more mass streaming of protests. No more streaming when you get pulled over.
Not because the government is directly stopping you, but because no one wants to host unapproved data.
Nice and clean, 20 minutes into the cyberpunk dystopia....
Disclaimer: This is entirely speculative fiction and may not be what transpires.
Does this really have a chance of holding up? Especially if Ajit Pai is gone in a few months?
If this goes through when will we see the effects of this? Immediately? A few months from now? And can this be turned over after the fact?
This won't impact Twitch at all unless there are people on the service that are streaming commercial productions for a profit...
I'm talking about TV shows, movies, music/concerts, etc. It's not going to be an issue.
I'm talking about TV shows, movies, music/concerts, etc. It's not going to be an issue.
I'm talking about TV shows, movies, music/concerts, etc. It's not going to be an issue.
If, and this is a BIG if, if it's anything from games, it would be the music that is already hit by DMCA anyway.
If, and this is a BIG if, if it's anything from games, it would be the music that is already hit by DMCA anyway.
Game streaming won't be impacted by this.
No.So it'll be affected like it currently is but worse now, got it.
This shouldn't nullify fair use. Just like the DMCA didn't kill fair use. It will however add another bs layer to the whole proceedings.How will this affect YouTube content? Is it now illegal to have copyrighted music in the background of a video essay?
Ooh, here's a fun near-future science-fiction thought. These kinds of laws could make companies so hesitant to host un-licensed content that merely uploading anything might be handled beforehand with a white list, not afterwards with a black list. What's this mean?
That you need a thumbs up from a higher power for that "stream/upload content" button to be unlocked. So unless your account is vouched by a company, no more streaming everyday shit by default — no one wants to wade through that per-moment licensing nightmare. It's why t-shirts and whatnot get blurred when tv shows shoot behind the scenes material. So instead of handling the impossible amount of content from regular folk, they'll just drape a blanket lockdown. What might be the side effect? Besides reshaping the face of YouTube and Twitch?
Facebook locks down photos and videos from common people. Twitter locks down photos and videos from common people. All public content hosting becomes curated. Personal content is only sent through email or private messages because common content has been de-platformed.
No more mass streaming of protests. No more streaming when you get pulled over.
Not because the government is directly stopping you, but because no one wants to host unapproved data.
Nice and clean, 20 minutes into the cyberpunk dystopia....
Disclaimer: This is entirely speculative fiction and may not be what transpires.
Ah yes who will they care about me or huge donations from corporations?I'm not American, but if you are American, write your congressperson to share your thoughts about this bill. They don't read Resetera so they won't know your opinion unless you share it with them.
It's all just a fad, I tell you, just like this entire video game or TV thing. Kid's will be back reading books, and listening to radio any day now.
This is a crime now. Victims have nothing to do with it. The government decides if it's going to charge someone.I can't imagine any video game companies willing to sue or file charges against a streamer.
I dunno. Atlus really doesn't like people streaming PersonaI can't imagine any video game companies willing to sue or file charges against a streamer. Seems counter productive as these content creators are a part of the industries marketing machine. What will they replace it with? Tv ads?
It might kill tiktok
Nintendo would love to shut down streaming and control it in every way they can.I can't imagine any video game companies willing to sue or file charges against a streamer. Seems counter productive as these content creators are a part of the industries marketing machine. What will they replace it with? Tv ads?
None of these fuckers read anything. They have aides do it all and just brief them. They don't do Jack shit all day besides posture and play games.I mean shouldn't the normal response be "ok cool so i don't vote for it until I get time to read it properly" instead of "yay count me in"?
Oh yes it is. Look at all the Cyberpunk videos that were taken down 2 weeks agoThis seems more aimed at things like Kodi (or better yet the sites you use with Kodii) and not Twitch/YT .
If they really wanted to couldn't they just shut streams down now? This doesn't really change that.Nintendo would love to shut down streaming and control it in every way they can.
they would shutdown any melee or brawl mod that they could.
Yeah, from what I've seen it's not for legal sites like twitch.This seems more aimed at things like Kodi (or better yet the sites you use with Kodii) and not Twitch/YT .
He would do exactly that, and still walk right back out but as the Leader of "The Wolves" (and all other gangs in the prison as well), plus somehow won a car and 50.000 bucks in the process.Dude will either walk right back out of there a free man within the first week due to some brazen idiocy, or be merked within the first hour of arriving for being told not to mess with that particular gang called "The Wolves" and saying out loud, "I could probably fight a wolf".
None of these fuckers read anything. They have aides do it all and just brief them. They don't do Jack shit all day besides posture and play games.
This won't impact Twitch at all unless there are people on the service that are streaming commercial productions for a profit...