never heard of this case before today, but reading stuff the last several hours it's a damn good thing they got him, and I hope they grill his ass
I just looked up Mr Cruel on Wikipedia. Holy shit, I hope there's eventually a breakthrough in that case too. Just reading the article made me so mad. D:<I heard some talk that he may have also been "Mr. Cruel" from Australia, so it's possible he left the country for a while and was operating elsewhere.
Why would they give a deal?This guy will probably get a deal, plead guilty, get life in prison.
What will they get out of going to trial?
I just went to buy it and the paperback version is out of stock! I guess a lot of people have had the same idea.The books is on offer on UK Amazon so I guess I'll be buying that. Strangely enough these were my next episodes on the Casefile podcast .
Closure for the victims.
I think they'll offer a life sentence so that the victims don't have to see this guy face to face. That's just a guess of course. He's going to prison, and he'll die there. If the victims want to testify, and go through the trial, then sure, the'll probably do it.Closure for the victims.
The Grim Sleeper went through a full trial:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grim_Sleeper
Closure for the victims.
The Grim Sleeper went through a full trial:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grim_Sleeper
I think they'll offer a life sentence so that the victims don't have to see this guy face to face. That's just a guess of course. He's going to prison, and he'll die there. If the victims want to testify, and go through the trial, then sure, the'll probably do it.
More people get closure when he pleads and reveals all of his kills and rapes.
I'm more concerned about the rape victims.I don't think its common that they offer plea deals to serial killers. The press conference was a parade of county prosecutors congratulating themselves. There is nothing to offer him anyway. The average time on death row is 18 years. He has seemingly already offered some information without a deal in place, such as the fact that he was the Visalia Ransacker.
Look at the recent serial killers caught:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grim_Sleeper - Full trial
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Rader - Pled guilty with no deal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Sowell - Full trial
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Ramirez - Full trial
It's doubtful that GSK is Mr. Cruel, unfortunately.I just looked up Mr Cruel on Wikipedia. Holy shit, I hope there's eventually a breakthrough in that case too. Just reading the article made me so mad. D:<
Yeah, that really pisses me off frankly. McNamara brought the case back into the public eye, and I know internet detectives hate her book and her by extension but it's hard to deny it's significance.So the police are saying McNamara's work had nothing to do with them finding this guy? I find that hard to believe, she at least kept the interest alive.
Isn't it pretty uncommon for police to acknowledge this sort of thing? I wouldn't let their official response bother you to much.It's doubtful that GSK is Mr. Cruel, unfortunately.
Yeah, that really pisses me off frankly. McNamara brought the case back into the public eye, and I know internet detectives hate her book and her by extension but it's hard to deny it's significance.
If he was found using DNA evidence, maybe the book really had nothing to do with his capture.
So the police are saying McNamara's work had nothing to do with them finding this guy? I find that hard to believe, she at least kept the interest alive.
They highly hinted there was a familial DNA match with the DNA database. Once you get that match you just need to narrow it down to the relatives that match the profile.It's doubtful that GSK is Mr. Cruel, unfortunately.
Yeah, that really pisses me off frankly. McNamara brought the case back into the public eye, and I know internet detectives hate her book and her by extension but it's hard to deny it's significance.
Yeah, that really pisses me off frankly. McNamara brought the case back into the public eye, and I know internet detectives hate her book and her by extension but it's hard to deny it's significance.
If the book kept it in the public consciousness and made it easier to justify continuing to fund he investigation, she's a hero. Also giving him the name "Golden State Killer" helped a lot because it was far more memorable (and scary) than what they had prior.If he was found using DNA evidence, maybe the book really had nothing to do with his capture.
Yep. This is probably accurate as to the how they found him.They highly hinted there was a familial DNA match with the DNA database. Once you get that match you just need to narrow it down to the relatives that match the profile.
Most of them think it's poorly written and just rehashes info they already had.
Most of them think it's poorly written and just rehashes info they already had.
Apparently cops never have and never will give credit/thanks to a journalist because it "emasculates" them since they themselves couldn't do their own job.
If the book kept it in the public consciousness and made it easier to justify continuing to fund he investigation, she's a hero. Also giving him the name "Golden State Killer" helped a lot because it was far more memorable (and scary) than what they had prior.
That's crazy.He was really determined to find the killer.Bruce Harrington, brother of one of the murder victims, spent $2 million of his own money to push for a ballot initiative to collect DNA from all felons and put them in the California DNA database. They gave him a speaking slot at the press conference even though he isn't law enforcement. He probably has the greatest claim to getting this done.
Is there evidence that a book published 1.5 months ago really led to this arrest?
The book was published recently, but she was involved with this publicly for years. They renamed him the Golden State Killer back in 2013 thanks to her article.Bruce Harrington, brother of one of the murder victims, spent $2 million of his own money to push for a ballot initiative to collect DNA from all felons and put them in the California DNA database. They gave him a speaking slot at the press conference even though he isn't law enforcement. He probably has the greatest claim to getting this done.
Is there evidence that a book published 1.5 months ago really led to this arrest?
Yeah, that really pisses me off frankly. McNamara brought the case back into the public eye, and I know internet detectives hate her book and her by extension but it's hard to deny it's significance.
Bruce Harrington, brother of one of the murder victims, spent $2 million of his own money to push for a ballot initiative to collect DNA from all felons and put them in the California DNA database. They gave him a speaking slot at the press conference even though he isn't law enforcement. He probably has the greatest claim to getting this done.
Is there evidence that a book published 1.5 months ago really led to this arrest?
They're acknowledging they know of the original 2013 article she wrote, where she dubbed him the GS Killer. An article that brought a ton of attention to this case. No one is saying she deserves all the credit, that would be dumb. But she deserves some.Just because it was published 1.5 months ago doesn't mean it wasn't known for long before that.
As Patton said, every time they say "Golden State Killer" they're acknowledging they at least know of the book.
If the book kept it in the public consciousness and made it easier to justify continuing to fund he investigation, she's a hero. Also giving him the name "Golden State Killer" helped a lot because it was far more memorable (and scary) than what they had prior.
LOL sure, let's pretend the article that led to the book in 2013 never happened.Nonsense, the book is only out a few months ago.
A new task force was brought together a few years ago to tackle the case.
There was massive interest in the case for years and years, many documentaries on the case.
The families and survivors helped keep this in the public interest, in all truth Michelle was a bit of a Johnny come lately, provided no new information and has been found out the book had no direct impact on it being solved.
The acknowledgement is deserved to those who have spent decades dealing with this and trying to solve it.
As another pointed out, Bruce Harrington has done much, much more than a book ever did.
I just don't understand how this pyschopathic piece of shit killed and raped all of those people, then went on to live a normal life in quiet suburbia. Surreal just thinking about it.
No it doesn't. She'd been working on this for years, too. It's not an insult for people to want to share congratulations with someone who died while working on publicizing this case. I, for one, first heard about the Golden State Killer through her work.
It is weird. So many of these serial killer/rapists have a compulsion and don't stop until they get caught or die. But this guy... he stops (that we know of) and just goes on to live a normal life. It's why a lot of people figured he was dead.
LOL sure, let's pretend the article that led to the book in 2013 never happened.
Makes you wonder if killed or raped anyone during his break or if he constantly thought about or planned out attacks but never went through with them.I just don't understand how this pyschopathic piece of shit killed and raped all of those people, then went on to live a normal life in quiet suburbia. Surreal just thinking about it.
Even had his daughter and granddaughter living in that house with him. I can't imagine what a nightmare it must be to wake up and find out what a monster her old man truly was. I wonder if he ever displayed any signs.
No it doesn't. She'd been working on this for years, too. It's not an insult for people to want to share congratulations with someone who died while working on publicizing this case. I, for one, first heard about the Golden State Killer through her work.