"but he doesn't play defense" is an even dumber argument against tom brady than it would be against diego maradona
Ask an Australian, Indian, Pakistani, West Indian, South African, Sri Lankan, Bangladeshi, English or New Zealander and many will know who he is. That is a massive amount of the world's population, just in India alone.
Brady completed the most (36) deep balls (20+ air yards) of any quarterback this season.very little is different in what actually brings the results, and brady has the freedom to do his own thing.
still lots of reliance on short passes and the te. (occasion success with the long pass)
and plenty of interceptions.
Forward like Messi or like you say, Maradona still explore like 8-10 kilo per game."but he doesn't play defense" is an even dumber argument against tom brady than it would be against diego maradona
I mean, yeah, you had Rodgers crying about how he was the actual GOAT recently. Even if you're discussing just the peak for Mahomes, he isn't even close in the conversation until we are talking about double digit years in the league with a consistent performance.Mahomes has demonstrated more talent in his first three seasons in the league than Brady has at any three year peak of his career. So Brady is certainly not the most talented QB to ever play.
He's the most accomplished/decorated and he's done it at a high level for the longest amount of time. The game has morphed into a pass heavy league. Other than his impressive number of rings, all his individual statistical records will fall over the next two decades. The rings might be surpassed as well, but that's much more doubtful.
I mean, yeah, you had Rodgers crying about how he was the actual GOAT recently. Even if you're discussing just the peak for Mahomes, he isn't even close in the conversation until we are talking about double digit years in the league with a consistent performance.
Being a greater player without the accolades makes it kind of a moot point.I'm not talking about peak Mahomes, as his entire career has been a peak higher than Brady has ever accomplished. That's my point. He's literally on a completely unprecedented trajectory in his first 3 seasons as a starter.
He's a "greater" player than Brady was ever at his very best. He doesn't have the same accolades and trophy chest yet that come with staying healthy over decades. Beating up on a shitty AFC East for decades helps, but the Chiefs have a similar stranglehold on the west currently.
Being a greater player without the accolades makes it kind of a moot point.
If he retired today he wouldn't be considered a better player.Does it? He has more accolades at this stage in his career than Brady had.
If he retired today he wouldn't be considered a better player.
I think he's great, wouldn't call his performances to this point and outlier. Again, we would need to resume this discussion in about a decade or so.He's not retiring, he's aiming for another ring in two weeks. That's irrelevant, unless you consider his three seasons as outliers.
If the chiefs win this year Mahomes will have won two Super Bowls in his first three years as a starter. Brady won two Super Bowls in his first three years as a starter (and then won a third in his fourth year). He has not achieved greater heights than Brady. He is simply on the same pace as Brady, and Brady continued that level of success for 20 years.I'm not talking about peak Mahomes, as his entire career has been a peak higher than Brady has ever accomplished. That's my point. He's literally on a completely unprecedented trajectory in his first 3 seasons as a starter.
He's a "greater" player than Brady was ever at his very best. He doesn't have the same accolades and trophy chest yet that come with staying healthy over decades. Beating up on a shitty AFC East for decades helps, but the Chiefs have a similar stranglehold on the west currently.
If the chiefs win this year Mahomes will have won two Super Bowls in his first three years as a starter. Brady won two Super Bowls in his first three years as a starter (and then won a third in his fourth). He has not achieved greater heights than Brady. He is simply on the same pace as Brady, and Brady continued that level of success for 20 years.
Mahomes first three years are better than any stretch in Brady's career? In 2016, 2017, and 2018 Brady went to three straight Super Bowls, won two of them, and won an MVP award. This was age age 39, 40, and 41. if we want to stretch beyond that 3 year period he went to 8 straight AFC championship games. What on earth are you talking about saying "Brady's peak years don't even compare to Mahomes' first three." This is just typical delusional Brady downplaying. People really take for granted how amazing his career was.
Mahomes had a lot of work ahead of him to be considered the greatest.
Even if they don't call that PI. Rodgers would have had to go up the field in 90 seconds with only 1 time out. Successfully get the 2pt conversion. And then win Overtime. That play Brady made before the half was the difference in that game, not the refs.
Seems like the question is who is the GOAT, rather than who was the most dominant, which I think is different though it's an easy argument to make that they should be the same. Obviously it's a hard question to answer given the differences in sports, not to mention eras.
But if the measuring stick, to compare across sports, is performance relative to contemporaries in that sport.... shouldn't participation be considered? How many cricket players were there in Bradman's Era? Similarly, how many hockey players in Gretzky's? Or football players generally? Not many, right?
Point being... shouldn't the GOAT be a soccer player since the participation is so much higher than cricket/football/hockey and therefore the quality of the opponents is much, much higher? So the best players of all time in soccer are that much more exceptional.
That said, maybe if there were 100 million cricket players in Bradman's era he still would have dominated.... but I doubt it....
So since it's the biggest sport in America = goat in any sport ? This is very disrespectful to all other countries in the world where American football is a niche sport (basically everywhere beside the US)Football is the biggest sport in America and as far as I know there isn't consistent way to measure soccer players due to all the leagues and different levels of cups or whatever.
So yeah, Brady is the greatest. Maybe MJ but he didn't have it for as long as Brady.
Mahomes is a dropped pick from that play not mattering at allMahomes is a Dee Ford offsides from being in his third Super Bowl in three years starting.
Meanwhile Brady playing role where its the least physical demanding outside than the kickers while also get the most credit. In the sport where team employ around 30 player and they banging, also apparently you must be extra careful with how you hit player in his role.
So since it's the biggest sport in America = goat in any sport ? This is very disrespectful to all other countries in the world where American football is a niche sport (basically everywhere beside the US)
And there's ways to measure a GOAT in football (soccer) the World Cup, the champions league, the Ballon d'or. There's a reason why the discussion is between Pelé, Maradona, Messi and Ronaldo.
Being a QB is like playing chess boxing except you're not allowed to punch back. It is the hardest position in footballForward like Messi or like you say, Maradona still explore like 8-10 kilo per game.
Meanwhile Brady playing role where its the least physical demanding outside than the kickers while also get the most credit. In the sport where team employ around 30 player and they banging, also apparently you must be extra careful with how you hit player in his role.
My english is not the best but I still want to mention the linearity of Brady's role if you really want to make outrageous claim across all sports.
Bledsoe will always be a HOFer to me.I'm very pleased with Brady having this kind of success this year. first because it strengthens my Bill Parcells > Bill Bellichick argument (Parcells built up 3 super bowl contending teams, took 2 different teams to the super bowl, won 2 rings, took a 4th team to the playoffs, never had a hall of fame QB). second because it just makes Eli and the giants look better. We slayed the dragon twice!
Forward like Messi or like you say, Maradona still explore like 8-10 kilo per game.
Meanwhile Brady playing role where its the least physical demanding outside than the kickers while also get the most credit. In the sport where team employ around 30 player and they banging, also apparently you must be extra careful with how you hit player in his role.
My english is not the best but I still want to mention the linearity of Brady's role if you really want to make outrageous claim across all sports.
Sports that only relevant in one country shouldn"t count.
Idc if he win 100 title, only american care.
Also the sport allow such a one dimensional and linear role to thrive. He don"t play defense and can extend his career.
Sports that only relevant in one country shouldn"t count.
Idc if he win 100 title, only american care.
Also the sport allow such a one dimensional and linear role to thrive. He don"t play defense and can extend his career.
There's probably an argument to be had for both bledsoe and simms, and all of this is in good fun and problematic hypotheticals, but if you gave parcells and QB like brady, I think it's entirely plausible that he'd have bellichick like success or even better. how many coaches have the kind of success parcells had with multiple teams? Andy Reid is literally the only other guy I can think of. Don Shula maybe? and that's TWO teams. Parcells had 4 playoff teams as a HC. Took 3 of them to conference championships, 2 of them to the super bowl, won the SB 2x with 1 team. I think it's a fun argument!
Parcells had elite quarterbacks, but it was just a different era of the NFL where it wasn't as quarterback heavy. Bledsoe was considered one of the best young QBs from ~1993-1998 or so, although it was a transition from the 80s/early 90s QBs through to the passing era that Manning, Brady, Brees, Warner, etc would ring in 5 years later. Bledsoe is kinda laughed about because he was the guy before Tom Brady, but he was a passing freak for most of his active years... 1994 in New England and 2002 in Buffalo were his best years, All Pro years, and his ffirst season with Dallas was decent too.
Just a different league, less quarterback dependent, and Parcells was always reticent to have passing offenses... he famously had that line ... "Only three things can happen when you pass the ball, and 2 of them are bad." DIfferent rules, different QB skill sets, and of course super roided meatmen in the 80s didn't really help quarterbacks and WRs.