Hell yeah baby, I was expecting the theme song to kick in when Finn started up the Ecto-1 but I am still super into everything they're showing here.
In terms of aesthetics, it really should be Ecto 1-A. I know Ecto 1 is the more classic car, but it's erking my brain, and now I can't focus on the film because my brain is shouting "It's should be 1-A, it should be 1-A" over and over like a freight train. So unless there's an explanation to who or how the car reverted back to the exact condition Ecto 1 was my brain won't actually be able to focus on the film.
the only thing my brain can think is 1-A is a separate vehicle and not a modification of Ecto-1, but that raises questions to why it wasn't just called Ecto 2 in Ghostbusters 2. My brain is overanalysing the shit out of this and now is stuck on Ecto 1.
yes I prefer the look of Ecto 1, but arghh my head!
Apparently Ecto-1 and Ecto-1A are two different vehicles. There's supposedly a shot in Ghostbusters 2 where the 1A license plate says Ecto-2 instead, whoops!
And even if they were the same vehicle, there's zero reason what so ever to keep all the "We're back in business!!!" shit on it for 30+ years. After like... 6 months they would have taken that stuff down, if even that long.
I took them all to be eccentric. Not lacking compassion. This is putting out there that during the events of GB1 and GB2 he either was actively disregarding his family or he didn't know about them. Which seems strange as well. They could have achieved the same effect if they had cast slightly older, mid 20s, and just made that person Spanglers kid. To make him a horrible father seems so weird and weird to the spirit of the characters. 🤷♂️
Honestly Ghostbusters was never based on serious worldbuilding. It was built on fun. If it was interested in going deeper, the events of the first two movies would've reshaped the entire world. In the sequel, it wouldn't have been Venkman and crew continuing their business in relative isolation. There would not have been a one and done court case. The full might of governments and megacorporations would've been utilized, thanks to the confirmation of the afterlife (a hostile one at that!) and the fact that we had the tools to affect it.
The Ghostbusters would've been the innovators, sure. Rich, perhaps, from their discoveries. But they would have swam in a sea of people operating like them as time marched on and their inventions spread. In all likelihood, spirit outbreaks would've occurred across the world. Maybe even religious wars. Life would never be the same again.
Barring some apocalyptic final battle that seals all supernatural power for good, there's no way that quiets down to an inaudible hum.
If Bill Murray hadn't been such a prick about it, this is exactly what we would have gotten. Dan Aykroyd wrote drafts of Ghostbusters sequels all the way up to Ghostbusters 6. He envisioned a world where they had franchised out across the country, shots of fleets of Ecto-1s crossing the Golden Gate Bridge, garbage truck sized mobile Ecto Containment Units. I think that a lot of people either forget or just don't know that Dan is a total fucking paranormal obsessed kook and this is his passion, he lives for this shit. They have to water it down for audiences but if he could he would jam all kinds of ghost lore into the movies. Hell the original concept of Ghostbusters before it got scaled way the fuck back to be even feasible as a movie was a group of janitors who were responsible for cleaning up paranormal anomalies across time and space, of which things like Stay Puft were just one of many - and one of the smaller ones at that.
Also, gonna champ for the IDW comic series, because it sounds like exactly what you want. There are multiple Ghostbusters HQs set up in it, they go across the US and even to other countries, there are rival ghost busting companies, etc. It's so fuckin' good I can't praise it enough.
So we are lead to believe then that the existence of the after life and portals to other dimensions is something that the world doesn't care about?
The idea that people just forgot about 100% proof of life after death and ghosts is just ridiculous. It seems like such a shame that they can't do more with the premise of "What would the world be like if we knew ghosts were real?"
Lmao y'all THAT'S THE JOKE
Three guys find undeniable proof of the afterlife and what do they do? They build a business around it. They monetize it. They treat the act of wearing nuclear bombs on their backs which they use to literally wrangle undead souls into a giant ghost prison like it's some shitty 9-5 job killing bugs or rats. And the world around them doesn't give enough of a shit to care, and writes them off as frauds. That is like the core of the Ghostbusters concept lmao hello, McFly!!
Besides which as people keep pointing out, in the trailer it's not that
everyone has forgotten the events (there's video of them on freaking YouTube) but specifically
these kids who don't know about a thing that happened 15+ years before they were born and was likely outright hidden from them.
Never watched Any Ghostbusters ...and this trailer didn't do anything to grab me otherwise... Meh
You should at the very least watch the original, it's very good. Ghostbusters 2 is pretty much a beat by beat copy of the original, but it still has some great stuff in it and memorable lines and characters. It's Answer the Call you don't really need to watch. I mean, you can, it's not nearly as bad as some people act like it is, but it's its own self contained thing now.