I'm doing some work on the reconciliation process of Germany in the international system post-ww2 and I genuinely think it's impressive. More so when put in contrast to other nations that haven't assessed their past or properly accounted for their mistakes ( Japan comes to mind).
Having to adopt a foreign policy approach that was reluctant yet pragmatic must've been incredibly challenging at the hight of state-building and the volatile situation of the world during the Cold War. The antimilitarist and moral internationalism stance, need to build cooperation with those it wronged, and slowly advocating for integration with the West and the institutionalization of such relations constitute the slow yet cohesive stance with which various Chancellors sought to advance their foreign policy.
It didn't even dawn on me how reconciliation is still imbedded in Germany's foreign policy today with their somewhat reluctant take in approaching offensive military plans for political outcomes in situations like Kosovo and Afghanistan and their heavy advocacy for multilateralism as a means to achieve it.
I did notice, however, that a large part of literature focuses on the Federal Republic of Germany's foreign policy approach as the de-facto entity behind most of the reconciliation efforts. I did come across many publications highlighting The German Democratic Republic's perspective at the time but it seemed to me that West Germany had a peculiar situation in trying to consolidate its ties with the West while slowly building bridges with the East and that's been at the centre of many discussions till the ultimate unification.
Would you agree that Germany's reconciliation led it to adopt a " pragmatic yet moral " approach today as a big military and civilian power in the international system?
Having to adopt a foreign policy approach that was reluctant yet pragmatic must've been incredibly challenging at the hight of state-building and the volatile situation of the world during the Cold War. The antimilitarist and moral internationalism stance, need to build cooperation with those it wronged, and slowly advocating for integration with the West and the institutionalization of such relations constitute the slow yet cohesive stance with which various Chancellors sought to advance their foreign policy.
It didn't even dawn on me how reconciliation is still imbedded in Germany's foreign policy today with their somewhat reluctant take in approaching offensive military plans for political outcomes in situations like Kosovo and Afghanistan and their heavy advocacy for multilateralism as a means to achieve it.
I did notice, however, that a large part of literature focuses on the Federal Republic of Germany's foreign policy approach as the de-facto entity behind most of the reconciliation efforts. I did come across many publications highlighting The German Democratic Republic's perspective at the time but it seemed to me that West Germany had a peculiar situation in trying to consolidate its ties with the West while slowly building bridges with the East and that's been at the centre of many discussions till the ultimate unification.
Would you agree that Germany's reconciliation led it to adopt a " pragmatic yet moral " approach today as a big military and civilian power in the international system?