They gave awards to a company infamous for crunch and harming devs. I think that's a valid critique.
"It was worse before so dont complain about it being bad now" is not a sensible defence
Every year its the same thing " too long" , "boring" etc etc
I think the award show have come a long way from the cringy spike awards, remember those?
Sure the show isnt perfect, but you can see the passion the man has for videogames and the work it goes for doing this.
For better or worse he kinda unites all the companies in one event and try to bring a positive vibe .
Everyone last night was "WHERE IS ELDEN RING??"
Do you really think he can control that? Of course he would love to have a bomb like that on stage, and others , yet, the show still provided some great games but some people only focus on what they want.
Game awards disapointing? What about e3? Those big hype events of microsoft and sony that are usually underwhelming? And those really can control what they want to show and most of the times they cant deliver , now imagine Geoff that is a simple jornalist.
I had a great time last night , we just take everything for granted these days.
LThey gave awards to a company infamous for crunch and harming devs. I think that's a valid critique.
Maybe thats the reason they re presented in the pre shows?Saying the show is too long is a hit on Geoff? Cause i feel its too long too, its poorly paced, you have a three hour award ceremony that still manages to tell more than half of the awards on the preshow one after the other. I'm not personally attacking Geoff Keighley here, just saying my opinion about the format of the awards. How is this a "hit"?
They gave awards to a company infamous for crunch and harming devs. I think that's a valid critique.
Studios with crunch culture on a game that is documented are ineligible for nominationsSay you are Geoff Keighley. How do you solve that problem exactly?
I dunno, maybe don't call it The Game *Awards* if you're going to relegate them to less than even a support billing.Maybe thats the reason they re presented in the pre shows?
Award shows are long no matter how you put it, you can tell he doesnt have the funds to do it so he needs all the marketing he does.
You sure can critize the duration of it but if you understand the reason you dont need to mention it i think.
But people would complain anyway even if it was short, something in the ways of:" Thats it?"
This year's particularly gave me the feeling that as a presenter, he had to shunt everything along without much of a moment to pause. Every trailer ended with "And that was <game name>, okay moving on", like we're at a lunch line.
GOD those were distractingThe only thing Geoff did wrong was wearing those big blue sneakers with that attire.
More games people, less Hollywood.
Then folks would stop complaining.
Absolutely, easy to see the amount of work in these events from the man himself. And indeed he manages somehow to have all companies under same roof in celebration. This year still unable to achieve E3 production values for sure but 1 or 2 years and he might exceed it. The fact that he managed to do the event yesterday the way it went + summer fest (in my view much worse) with all the challenges this year had is amazing.Every year its the same thing " too long" , "boring" etc etc
I think the award show have come a long way from the cringy spike awards, remember those?
Sure the show isnt perfect, but you can see the passion the man has for videogames and the work it goes for doing this.
For better or worse he kinda unites all the companies in one event and try to bring a positive vibe .
Everyone last night was "WHERE IS ELDEN RING??"
Do you really think he can control that? Of course he would love to have a bomb like that on stage, and others , yet, the show still provided some great games but some people only focus on what they want.
Game awards disapointing? What about e3? Those big hype events of microsoft and sony that are usually underwhelming? And those really can control what they want to show and most of the times they cant deliver , now imagine Geoff that is a simple jornalist.
I had a great time last night , we just take everything for granted these days.
And the shoulder zipper things. Jk, he seems to care and know more about fashion than I do.The only thing Geoff did wrong was wearing those big blue sneakers with that attire.
People in general, Era in particular, will always complain about somethingMore games people, less Hollywood.
Then folks would stop complaining.
Clever way to drive home your point.People in general, Era in particular, will always complain about something
They gave awards to a company infamous for crunch and harming devs. I think that's a valid critique.
You don't think the employees should get any recognition at all then?They gave awards to a company infamous for crunch and harming devs. I think that's a valid critique.
It's a show with a weird set of priorities. They want to run an awards show rewarding creative achievement and critical success, but dedicate more time and emphasis on reveals of new games that haven't 'put in the work' yet. Imagine winning an award for your game and getting less air time for your congrats than some CG trailer for a game that has nothing made yet.
It just wants to be too many things, despite not being that short of a show at like 3 hours. As the host, Keighley is in a tough spot where the show extending itself this way means he has more opportunities to disappoint someone.
This year's particularly gave me the feeling that as a presenter, he had to shunt everything along without much of a moment to pause. Every trailer ended with "And that was <game name>, okay moving on", like we're at a lunch line.
It gives off a pretty cynical feeling that they had a list of X amount of partnership agreements to get through and a strict time limit. I don't know how people read this as 'passion for games'. I appreciate trying to touch base with various pillars of the gaming community, but the pace is crazy and comes off a bit hollow.
I agree with this. I understand that the show needs to make money, but don't make the actual awards seem like such an afterthought. Show clips of the games after you say their names and give a little bit of suspense for the award itself. Also saying "Wow, X game, great, now our next award is..." kinda comes off as callous. Would prefer him to not even acknowledge the trailer and simply say "Our next award is for..."