It is baffling to me how anyone could play these massive open world levels with absolutely nothing in them and then think this is the best Gears of War game.
Great review dude. Not biased at all.
It is baffling to me how anyone could play these massive open world levels with absolutely nothing in them and then think this is the best Gears of War game.
I think when you take into account its running 60 fps 4k on a console and looks like this , its pretty impressive .I'm not seeing it.
Especially in that 2nd shot... that one to me looks kinda bad to me.
First shot just has some god rays which... I mean.... it's been done to that quality already (if not better).
I dunno. Looks ok.
It's always quite a ride.Very good scores, so far.
However, the real winner is this review thread. Review threads for AAA games that only appear on one console never disappoint.
For environments its definitely up there , characters models still look weird to me but every level and all the effects so far are definitely some of the best we've seen this gen
Lol ok. If you have so many great games to play, why are you wasting your time in a thread about a game you have interest in? Your time is precious! Hurry and get to those other games lolShame, this could have been the game to finally get me to bite on Gamepass PC.
Doesn't seem like it's anything exceptional though. When I have so many other acclaimed games to play can't justify giving up time for this.
So a game needs to have perfect scores to be worth spending $1 to see if you like it yourself?
Don't feed the trolls, don't feed the trolls, don't feed the trolls
No you dont. You're dicking around on here making sure everyone knows you dont have gamepass. If you valued your time you wouldn't be wasting it on this thread lol
Troll harder.
I'm not taking sides here but I'd like to know some of these 90+ games. I might play some myself. I'm interested in what you have to offer.I value my time more, and that's why Gamepass is worthless to me.
You could give it to me for free but then what.. I don't have time to play it cos I have a bunch of 90+ rated games in waiting and MP games to play with my friends.
My favourite is the posts that are like "welp looks like this is nothing exceptional, too many other critically acclaimed masterpieces to play" despite the fact that this has 90%+ critical acclaim.WTF is going on here? it scored 86 it's a good score, nothing exceptional yes but that doesn't mean it's bad lol, you people don't play anything with less than 90 meta?
whatever it's funny watching fanboys fight it feel like i'm in 2006 - 2009 or something lol
i'm sure it's gonna be a shitshow too if Death Stranding scored badly
My favourite is the posts that are like "welp looks like this is nothing exceptional, too many other critically acclaimed masterpieces to play" despite the fact that this has 90%+ critical acclaim.
It is baffling to me how anyone could play these massive open world levels with absolutely nothing in them and then think this is the best Gears of War game.
Not necessarily, but it at least needs to be on par with the rest of those games.
The truth is unless it really is an exceptional game it won't be able to pull me away from my multiplayer sessions.
It is baffling to me how anyone could play these massive open world levels with absolutely nothing in them and then think this is the best Gears of War game.
Jesus Christ your haircut is horrible and you look like a wannabe Ricky Gervais.
anyway, your comment made me laugh so instead of reviewing videogames you could have a career as a comedian.
What a stupid post.What's your psn id? Cause I'm willing to bet you have a lot of games with trophies earned that dont fit into your highly exclusive bubble.
There are no open world levels. There's open world hubs that you can choose to explore or ignore on your way to missions or side missions, and while they're not populated with enemies and wildlife they also don't have 'absolutely nothing in them' so...It is baffling to me how anyone could play these massive open world levels with absolutely nothing in them and then think this is the best Gears of War game.
I give the thread an 8.8Very good scores, so far.
However, the real winner is this review thread. Review threads for AAA games that only appear on one console never disappoint.
Not necessarily, but it at least needs to be on par with the rest of those games.
So if like, 3 other people gave the game a 100 score would you play it? You baffle me and it's embarrassingly pretentious to base your like of video games on reviews (especially when Its well received but meh 4 more numbers would definitely make it great /s). So is spiderman not worth you time? Is fallout new vegas not worth any of your time? I gaurentee youve enjoyed a plethora of games with worse metacritic scores than 86. You are very obviously a troll. Lol
60 more reviews are yet to come. This thread can go either way lol.Checking twitter why there are people think there thread bloodbath here right now lol?
I mean yeah it's bloodbath in first few page due to 83 metascore at the start but most if not all people goes calm(or leave the thread) when it went up to 85.
And yet you reply with an answer that makes you look even worse, if you can't accept someone does not like a game you do do not engage into pointless confrontations.I don't think so. He is claiming Gears 5 does not meet his criteria as being worth his time. Yet I'd be willing to bet he has played and enjoyed quite a few games that fit outside this "if it's not 90+ its skippable" rule.
If what I assuming is true then he's just spouting bullshit to dog pile on a game under the pretense that it's not good enough for him.
Looking through all the reviews again, this is really pretty great scoring overall.
- 6th game in the series
- 5 modes
- Narrative Singleplayer
- Polished and tuned gameplay
- Amazing graphics
- 60fps on all the newest hardware (60fps ++ on PC)
86 Meta for a 6th game in a series like this seems great. Also, there isn't any other exclusive game like Gears with this much to offer on any other platform.
Looking forward to co-op-ing the story with a couple friends and then Hording it up with 2 extra friends. Going to be a blast!
Why are people getting so personal with this, chill the fuck out.
If it down to 84 or more i assume there is something wrong with multiplayer, since the later score should be including mp modes.60 more reviews are yet to come. This thread can go either way lol.
OT
Great reviews.gonna play it soon. Anything above 80 in meta is good in my opinion
Coop online and offline. Up to 3 players so underrated atm and almost taken for granted with Gears in a time where splitscreen is dying.Looking through all the reviews again, this is really pretty great scoring overall.
- 6th game in the series
- 5 modes
- Narrative Singleplayer
- Polished and tuned gameplay
- Amazing graphics
- 60fps on all the newest hardware (60fps ++ on PC)
86 Meta for a 6th game in a series like this seems great. Also, there isn't any other exclusive game like Gears with this much to offer on any other platform.
Looking forward to co-op-ing the story with a couple friends and then Hording it up with 2 extra friends. Going to be a blast!
And yet you reply with an answer that makes you look even worse, if you can't accept someone does not like a game you do do not engage into pointless confrontations.
It is baffling to me how anyone could play these massive open world levels with absolutely nothing in them and then think this is the best Gears of War game.
Ooooo yeah and now with gp ultimate, can finally do some multiplayer!
With the verge,polygon,Ign, Ign italia etc... i think he could be smash 88-89
WTF is going on here? it scored 86 it's a good score, nothing exceptional yes but that doesn't mean it's bad lol, you people don't play anything with less than 90 meta?
whatever it's funny watching fanboys fight it feel like i'm in 2006 - 2009 or something lol
i'm sure it's gonna be a shitshow too if Death Stranding scored badly