-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Gears 5 - Graphics and Frame Rate Comparison
- Thread starter Theorry
- Start date
that was trolled to hell and called out a lot.
I don't know, was RDR2 native 4K on Pro?
Game looked amazing when I played it over the weekend on my X. The colors and HDR just pop so well and the image is so clean looking.
It's not trolling to say the game still looks feels and plays the same as the first one after 15 years. grow up!
So you played the beta?! And it is trolling to say the game has had no improvements over 15 years!
Um yeah. People here especially kept going on and on about the game being Native 4K/60FPS so of course that's what people expected.
I think most people including myself thought it would be native 4k and 60fps, because that's what we've been reading or hearing for weeks and months. I mean, if you just type 4k 60fps in search, you get a tonne of hits for it regarding Gears 5. Barely any mention of CBR or dynamic resolution anywhere.
Dont get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with CBR, but yes, I did think it was going to be native 4k, and evidently so did others. If anything I'm actually glad it's CBR, since at least that way they can push the graphics further.
Having said that, I still would have preferred the campaign targeted 30fps so they could blow the visuals and scope out. Dropping to 720p on the base One is also a bit disappointing, but that's the price of 60fps and the One hardware I guess.
Gears 5 graphics Native 4k 60fps.
Last edited:
I should clarify since you quoted me that PC always have the option for native 4K and 60fps.
OP
OP
I checked the benchmark thread and only saw 3 people saying native 4k. Most said 4k.
Most say 4K not native 4K.
At least you know you've been bookmarked to be called out when Halo Infinite launches.
Which means some people were indeed expecting native 4K, which you said didn't happen...
They desperately need to tweak the enforcer weapon but the game looks and feels fantastic.
The reason it feels like trolling to say, "the game doesn't even look that good." Is because the game looks and plays fucking fantastic. I'm not going to assume your motives you say such asinine things but it is a ridiculous statement.
The reason it feels like trolling to say, "the game doesn't even look that good." Is because the game looks and plays fucking fantastic. I'm not going to assume your motives you say such asinine things but it is a ridiculous statement.
Well this thread is about the resolution and frame rate of Gears 5, no? Not really off topic.
OP
OP
Not sure what you are trying to say? You said check the benchmark thread and i did and saw indeed 3 people saying native.
Well even saying 4K can mislead people. It's funny those same people who were saying 4K are now including "Dynamic" in their statement now that the truth is out there where as they never said anything about it before.
This video does raise concerns for the frame rate during the campaign. The boot camp doesn't hold a locked 60fps and the campaign will surely be more demanding. I know it's unfinished code, but it'll be interesting to see how it hold up at release.
That's unrealistic for multiple reasons. The average gamer doesn't care how the resolution is reached, when talking in interviews it's easier to say "4K" than "reconstructed 4K using temporal injection", and if someone really cares to know the details they can usually figure them out.
It's not saying native 4K and the game outputs a 3840x2160 resolution, so I don't see how it's misleading.
That's unrealistic for multiple reasons. The average gamer doesn't care how the resolution is reached, when talking in interviews it's easier to say "4K" than "reconstructed 4K using temporal injection", and if someone really cares to know the details they can usually figure them out.
It's not saying native 4K and the game outputs a 3840x2160 resolution, so I don't see how it's misleading.
Dynamic means that it'll run at native 4K/60fps on next gen. I'm glad they made 60fps the performance target over native 4K. Doubling the framerate of Gears 4 SP and keeping it at native 4K was always going to be a tall task. Generally though, clearer language on this would be really rather helpful.
Yea, I remember you said you thought it'd be native 4k for MP, non native for SP, which I thought was surprising as campaigns are usually the component that is prioritised for IQ and visuals.
OP
OP
I really dont follow. I agree with you. I didnt see people saying native and then you said check the benchmark thread and indeed saw a couple saying it.
So now you agree with me?
But here you didn't? I don't follow you.
They can use terms like 4Kcr or 4Kti instead of just 4K to clear the confusion for us enthusiasts.
OP
OP
Well to be fair its hard to see if a game is dynamic and we only "find out" when VGtech, DF etc do test. Wich makes always imo the dynamic res argument for games better if people have a hard time seeing the changes.
User banned (3 days): needless hostility towards another member
Fuck off
On this forum people often mention CBR when talking about a non native 4K game, eg 4K CB, 4K reconstructed, dynamic 4K etc. I think it's clear most or many thought it'd be native 4K, highlighted by the fact that some straight out mention native 4K, and also never got challenged or called up on it I might add. Because why would they, the assumption was they were right. Again, I'm actually personally glad it's CBR, but the messaging around it certainly muddied the waters.
OP
OP
Yes. But afterwards i checked the benchmark thread and saw indeed 3 people saying native. Not sure what i need to say more.
OP
OP
Most people said 4k tho. Not native . And usyally people only start saying CBR and dynamic res when VGtech and DF get their hands on it and we know whats its using.
So its not that weird most people just said 4K before that. :)
There has never been an interview, comment, or article from the devs that it was native. We also have had people like myself and others predict it wouldn't be native 4K with them targeting 60fps. Anyone thinking this would be native wasn't paying attention or had unrealistic expectations.
I don't disagree there, more information is always better. I wonder if those terms aren't generally thrown out by developers because it would probably confuse the average gamer more than informing them.
I don't know, was RDR2 native 4K on Pro?
Technically it's not misleading....for those who can read the bottom line. The game DOES OUTPUTS 2160p. :D
When somebody mention just "4k", it's accepted as "native 4k". Like 1080p before too.
What people expexted when during E3 2014 MS said that MCC collection will be 1080p? Dynamic, recostructed....? Nothing else other than native. And in then end collection is in native 1080p. Same crap when you say "4k"
So now 4k isn't actually 4k unless you state native.
What a joke this resolution shite has become.
Some multiplayer screens focusing on environment and lighting.
Don't understand people saying it doesn't look impressive.
Some multiplayer screens focusing on environment and lighting.
Now these are great! Some of these look like concept art.
OP
OP
Well this TR and really started to become more of a thing for games with the 4k consoles. So its not really the same as the 1080p story.
Halo 5 was also marketed as 1080p but used a dynamic res also at the end.
So it uses reconstruction and a dynamic res base to construct from?
It can hit "native 4K" but when it fails to maintain it will drop and start reconstructing?
If it maintains 60 locked then im sold.
As for the graphics not being impressive.
For MP to look this good im honestly a little taken aback that people would say that?
It can hit "native 4K" but when it fails to maintain it will drop and start reconstructing?
If it maintains 60 locked then im sold.
As for the graphics not being impressive.
For MP to look this good im honestly a little taken aback that people would say that?