He said that regarding one particular game that performs better on AMD hardware than NVIDIA on PC and he clarifies this very specific point in said video.
Yeah, imagine your friends come over and they see a keyboard on the table in the living room, what an embarrassment.
lol I've got one right here in my living room that I paid $399 for.
And this post is hilarious for people who actually own that console. I'm pretty sure they manufactured more DEs than Nvidia did with 3xxx FE cards. So they don't exist too, right?
Uhh people who hook up their PC's to TVs are very much in the minorities despite what many people try to claim. I personally have my PS5 hooked up to my 4K TV in the living room and my PC(intel i9 10850k and a 3080) hooked up to a 1440/144 monitor(which ironically cost more than the TV) in the bedroom. I actually don't know anyone who hooks their PC to their TV, it makes using it as a PC so very impractical.
If a similar performance differential was shown would you care? Games people actually play, give me a break. These results aren't shitting on the PS5, it's showing the games were not well optimized based on what we know about the hardware! And inform purchases lol. You mean inform someone's purchase of Fortnite?
Its honestly blowing my mind right now, like I'm living in alternate reality with my DE.
Sorry, I meant that Alex clarifies in his video that Valhalla runs better on AMD hardware than NVIDIA on PC, thus potentially making the performance differential greater than other games when comparing Valhalla's PS5 performance to PC. Steve does not reference any DF material in OPs video.
You went really hard on one line which is accurate (The DE is taking a bigger hit to be cheaper). I'm not concerned about Sony's bottom line, I'm recognizing which model Sony actually produces more of by a substantial margin because the tech of the PS5 is worth $499
This was patched but it also has nothing to do with the internal resolution the game renders at and that they're benchmarking against, only the output display resolution. DMC5:SE renders at a reconstructed 3840x2160 when raytracing is disabled and the high frame rate mode (120 Hz) is enabled. Steve I guess considers this a negligible increase in resolution when benchmarking against PC at 1080p.Isn't it possible that DMC's 120hz mode is displaying at 1440p for PS5 ?
Steve is likely using a monitor that can output 1440 like the NU8000
No, what they are saying is that the Samsung NU8000 only supports a maximum of 1440p @ 120hz. Devil May Cry drops to 1080p but forces the 120hz refresh rate thus lowering the output resolution of the display to 1440p @ 120hz.Isn't it possible that DMC's 120hz mode is displaying at 1440p for PS5 ?
Steve is likely using a monitor that can output 1440 like the NU8000
What even is this post. You guys planning to just run everyone off this board who isn't Sony or Die?
While I kinda agree with the greater point of this, it's pretty disingenuous to say the console is the cost of the console alone while the PC HAS to include a desk, monitor, speakers, headset, etc. The only periphs you NEED for a PC are a mouse and keyboard, which you can get for $20-30 if you don't care for fancy stuff. I read your earlier arguments about not everybody having a monitor and TVs not being normal, but by that metric a very small portion of PS5 users don't have a PS+ subscription and I'd argue half or less don't have a headset, so those would have to be accounted for.
Y'all are starting to sound like trump. Like it or not the ps5 starts at $400.
