• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Uzupedro

Banned
May 16, 2020
12,234
Rio de Janeiro
On the GameInformer show they addresed the Crunch subject at CD Projekt Red, and one of the hosts said that people at CD didn't agreed with the way the story was spread and they choose to do the overtime work.
Honestly I don't know what to think about this, it could be true, but this is a sensitive topic and I trust Jason's work so...I will wait for the next episodes.
The clip:


Full livestream(timestamped with the time where they start to talk about it):

 

bluexy

Comics Enabler & Freelance Games Journalist
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
14,517
Uhh, choosing to crunch is still crunch and the argument that workers are doing crunch out of their own passion and excitement for their work is a big part of what enables crunch culture to continue. Of course you're going to hear that crunch is overblown, because only workers who are comfortable with crunch are freely able to speak about it aloud.
 

lostconst

Member
Oct 27, 2017
634
I mean, if you typically ask someone:

A) delay a project, continue to get paid, see your families

Or

B) work extra long hours for no personal reward

It seems like they'd typically choose A
 

STGHMAAV

Member
Oct 26, 2017
285
Which kind of support? "Supported crunch" or "if we don't support it we're going to be fired"¿
 

tulpa

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
3,878
gotta love all the "again i'd never support crunch, but..." and the "i'd never defend crunch, but..."
 
Oct 27, 2017
20,761
Uhh, choosing to crunch is still crunch and the argument that workers are doing crunch out of their own passion and excitement for their work is a big part of what enables crunch culture to continue. Of course you're going to hear that crunch is overblown, because only workers who are comfortable with crunch are freely able to speak about it aloud.
I agree and couldn't have said it better.
 
OP
OP
Uzupedro

Uzupedro

Banned
May 16, 2020
12,234
Rio de Janeiro
Uhh, choosing to crunch is still crunch and the argument that workers are doing crunch out of their own passion and excitement for their work is a big part of what enables crunch culture to continue. Of course you're going to hear that crunch is overblown, because only workers who are comfortable with crunch are freely able to speak about it aloud.
Isn't choosing to do overtime work... part of crunch culture?

Like... what?
I don't disagree, just repeating what she said.
 

platocplx

2020 Member Elect
Member
Oct 30, 2017
36,072
Honestly I think its more in the middle. Some people still were upset with it and others were probably okay with it. This is typically how it goes usually in those kind of situations, But overall crunch is still bad And it does take a toll over time if its something that happens for months and months. It sounds like this was more of a typical project scenario where there was some crunch needed at the end to help finish the work and typically most people can be okay with a couple weeks of OT especially when it sounds like they are compensated.
 

Yerffej

Prophet of Regret
Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,536
What a nonsense story. I CHOSE to hit my thumb with a hammer.
 

Domino

Member
Oct 25, 2017
511
The employees should never have been put into the position where they would feel the need to "choose crunch".
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,606
I didn't read Jason's article because of the Bloomberg paywall, but I assume the difference is she talked to people who don't view it as crunch and Jason spoke to people who view it as harmful.

But peer pressure is a real thing that happens since people feel obligated to work in order to look good and not lose their jobs.
 

Kalor

Resettlement Advisor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,629
Choosing to crunch is still crunch. I'm sure there were varying feeling within the company since it's not like everyone feels the same but doing it for the "passion" is still bad.
 
Aug 23, 2018
2,376
It's a complicated issue compounded by the fact that this is not a US-based country that Jason typically covers. Different culture around work, and more importantly different regulations.

Good that the employees get the extra compensation for their extra hours of work, though.
 

Deleted member 13077

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,513
Sounds like a second batch of the CDPR Kool Aid just got delivered.

Lots of influencers are going to be doing everything they can to play this shit down because they have a game to hype and click to get, so I'm not massively surprised we're seeing this now.
 

Deleted member 50232

User requested account closure
Banned
Dec 3, 2018
2,509
Did Jason speak to multiple people at cd projekt for his article? I got the impression reading it that he only spoke to like one employee regarding the matter.
 

AuthenticM

Son Altesse Sérénissime
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
30,079
Uhh, choosing to crunch is still crunch and the argument that workers are doing crunch out of their own passion and excitement for their work is a big part of what enables crunch culture to continue. Of course you're going to hear that crunch is overblown, because only workers who are comfortable with crunch are freely able to speak about it aloud.
seriously. That the devs agreed to this is irrelevant.
 

VG Aficionado

Member
Nov 6, 2017
1,385
But they're getting paid for the extra hours, right?

I wish the best for the developers, but crunch in huge games such as these is simply inevitable. Can you say that a title of this caliber has never undergone crunch?
 
Oct 27, 2017
12,238
I remember Jason's article where he interviewed some Rockstar's employee...with an HR person on the room. I mean, what they're supposed to say?
 

Ra

Rap Genius
Moderator
Oct 27, 2017
12,207
Dark Space
Yes I'm sure there was no pressure from CDPR management to not delay the game.

"Polish people like to work hard" is not an excuse.
 

ket

Member
Jul 27, 2018
12,969
Yeah I listened to this segment yesterday and it was odd. I get what she's saying but the idea that crunch is truly optional for employees seems unrealistic to me.
 

Deleted member 5491

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,249
You will always have people to be okay to do some overtime, ceuase it's still a passion project for them.
Doesn't mean, that they lacking in solidarity towards their coworkers, who can't do overtime for whatever reasons.
And shit like peer pressure exists, too just like Kanzodielocke said
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,742
Isn't choosing to do overtime work... part of crunch culture?

Like... what?
Yes. And like years ago when there was another controversy about working conditions at CDPR and the long hours, they literally made a statement of you can't stand the height get out of the kitchen, we already know there are devs that defend the hell out of crunch, they are the workaholics that get promoted and keep the crunch culture while their colleagues get burned out and leave.
 

Chuck795

Member
May 7, 2020
738
User Warned: Downplaying Concerns Around Abusive Work Practices (3 Day Threadban)
Uhh, choosing to crunch is still crunch and the argument that workers are doing crunch out of their own passion and excitement for their work is a big part of what enables crunch culture to continue. Of course you're going to hear that crunch is overblown, because only workers who are comfortable with crunch are freely able to speak about it aloud.
Okay, but they're also being paid this extra day and revenue splitting 10% of the profits. Quit it with this woe is me stuff. I'm from Poland, my whole family is, the average wage there is like $8,000/year while working 6-7 days a week.

These devs are millionaires compared to the average Polish person. They CHOSE to get paid these extra days to push the game out. If they didn't like it, they could vote another way, or leave! I'm a teacher and often work 50-60 hours a week and only get paid for 40 of them, that is life.
 
Oct 30, 2017
272
If CDPR came to them with two options: 1) Delay the game again or 2) Work an extra day for 6 weeks and the devs all agreed to do the extra day to get the game out on time then more power to them. I am not going to tell someone else what is best for them. There is plenty of information out there and they know there own situations better than any one of us could ever know.

That being said, this all hinges on if it was an actual choice. If it was, then I am fine with it. If not, or it was an illusion of choice, then I am not. Simple as that.
 

Leeway

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,415
Vancouver, BC
I don't doubt there's a culture within the company that are fine with it. But I guarantee not everyone there feels the same. Speaking from experience in an adjacent industry, it usually boils down to guilt and peer pressure and that should never be a thing.
 

Micerider

Member
Nov 11, 2017
1,180
Well, of course, this is the point about crunch culture : it's accepted as something « we oughta do ». This is extremely weird take as even CDPR boss admited to it and said he never wanted to reach this situation.
 

Admiral Woofington

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
14,892
As long as their paid hourly and get incentives for working extra that are solely monetary then yeah there'd be a sizable group happy to do it. I work in an industry where 6 days at 10 hours each is not unheard of and fairly normal. The happiest people to work it are those that are paid hourly.
 

Fiery Phoenix

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,838
Sounds completely believable to me. At some point someone has to make a decision, and it won't always be a pleasant one.
 

Gentlemen

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,524
"They chose to crunch"

"Cultural differences!"

These are the same tired arguments we already heard and don't warrant a demand for answers from Schreier. It's incredibly stupid to accuse him of being deliberately misleading/inflammatory.

She's on some bullshit here. CDPR isn't special for how it crunches vs other companies.
 

Jamrock User

Member
Jan 24, 2018
3,163
I imagine if you said "I hate doing crunch and hate crunching"

You'd be fired on spot or giving treatment that made you want to be fired.
 

Xando

Member
Oct 28, 2017
27,314
Don't expect ERA to understand but as someone working in consulting this is pretty much the general attitude in huge multinational projects
 

tulpa

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
3,878



also just gonna say. this person in the video was defending crunch. straight up. do not say "i don't support crunch but..." and then proceed to repeatedly defend crunch
 

Cliff Steele

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
4,477
Seems like normal european workculture. You see this stuff all the time in germany. If it's paid I see no problem.
 

Amnixia

▲ Legend ▲
The Fallen
Jan 25, 2018
10,424
I mean, if you typically ask someone:

A) delay a project, continue to get paid, see your families

Or

B) work extra long hours for no personal reward

It seems like they'd typically choose A

Crunch sucks and I admit I know nothing of Polish labour laws but how certain are we of "no personal reward"?
 

metalslimer

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,565
Okay, but they're also being paid this extra day and revenue splitting 10% of the profits. Quit it with this woe is me stuff. I'm from Poland, my whole family is, the average wage there is like $8,000/year while working 6-7 days a week.

These devs are millionaires compared to the average Polish person. They CHOSE to get paid these extra days to push the game out. If they didn't like it, they could vote another way, or leave! I'm a teacher and often work 50-60 hours a week and only get paid for 40 of them, that is life.

This is one salty ass post
 

Zeneric

Banned
Aug 29, 2019
262
Some people don't mind crunching 'cause they enjoy. Crunching is not always a bad thing.
Passion sees crunching as nothing.
Some modders crunch "endlessly" for free.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.