I mean, ok? This is misleading,I guess, because I don't think that they are on equal ground and this hardly is indicative of actual computing power.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
"Fortnite: 120FPS now on iPad Pro, something consoles can't do yet "
- Thread starter ApeEscaper
- Start date
120fps Sure must feel nice
could someone with an iPad Pro Provider an ingame Screenshot? Would be really interesting to see (resolution & assets)
could someone with an iPad Pro Provider an ingame Screenshot? Would be really interesting to see (resolution & assets)
what I really want on it is Disco Elysium since I'm that would work well on a tablet and Switch probably isn't getting that.
Well with the hardware next-gen consoles have, they can do 240 FPS at 4K.
I hope they consider it and uodate the fame especially that it is a store game so universal at does need only an update.
I hope they consider it and uodate the fame especially that it is a store game so universal at does need only an update.
I'd say 120 FPS @ Medium settings on a mobile device that isn't dedicated to gaming and isn't cooled by a fan is nice no matter which way you look at it. There are other games that support 120 FPS as well. Always nice to see more.
You were the one that made the comparison lol
The Apple TV 4K happened to release early than the A12X. They have pretty much the same SoC size.
I thought high frame rate fans didn't mind lower quality graphics to achieve those frame rates?
I have an iPad pro brand new model. I might test this.
Fucking thing cost my company a fortune so it being this capable isn't surprising, what else can it do like this?
Fucking thing cost my company a fortune so it being this capable isn't surprising, what else can it do like this?
The consoles could so easily do this running the iPad spec version of the game. The visuals are cut down significantly from the main version.
The big issue with consoles and high frame-rates is that very few consumer TVs even support higher than 60fps.
The big issue with consoles and high frame-rates is that very few consumer TVs even support higher than 60fps.
I'm pretty sure this game looks much better on Xbox and PS4. If they downgrade it to iOS level graphics they'd also run with 120 fps.
Edit: just saw dark1x' comment
Edit: just saw dark1x' comment
Yeah in performance mode on the 2018 model. Looks decent but it's definitely blurrier with some missing effects.
The most impressive thing is the screen itself. It's even crazier to think that the 2017 model basically had the same one.
Poor attempt at trolling. There's such a thing as a middle ground.
True. Looking forward to my Galaxy 20 Ultra with 120hz Display 🤤
'super ultra mega low' doesn't sound like a middle ground either
... that's what I'm saying. If the iPad pro runs at an unstable 120 FPS with super low settings then it's not the same as running at a consistent 120 FPS with decent settings.
For those excited that this can run at 120fps, Moonlight game streaming (Nvidia only) can stream games at 120fps on capable iPads as well. I played a bit of Fortnite at 120fps on my iPad months ago with it and it's pretty nice. I've got a 2017 Pro so I can't try this version out.
When I set to 120fps it changes the graphic quality to medium. I've not really played Fortnite before so not sure how it compares. There is also high (60fps) and epic (30fps) graphics settings.
This trend benefits everyone. The more demand there is for very high fps the more games will at least aim for 60 rather than 30 on mid-range devices such as consoles.
ooh nice. Only have a 1080 but that should still be decent for some games. Never tried 120hz as my monitor doesn't support it, but going to try grid and fortnite (never played fortnite)
On closed boxes it makes sense to sqeeze as much as devs can out of the hardware. As long as its not a fighting game i have no issues with 30fps. If devs want to make a game 60fps from the start of development thats fine. But i have no interest in mandating res or fps in favor of other things related to games. Just my opinion.
Looks awful compared to the console versions of the game. Streaming in level of detail at like 5 feet from the player, including shadows. A very compromised way to play the game.
I suppose it would be more work on the developers part, but it would make more sense to me to use the increased performance to push for better detail as opposed to a higher framerate.
I think users should be given the ability to choose between settings whenever possible.
Only on the second and third generation iPad Pros. It dynamically changes depending on what app/content you're using so the battery life is still very good. It's by far the best feature of the Pro and ruins 60hz devices once you go back, even for basic stuff like scrolling a web page.
iPhone should be getting it this year I assume.
Looks fine to me. For reference, Switch version is only 30fps. Is fortnite a CPU bound game?
It's been years waiting for TV standards to move forwards. HDMI 2.1 is a wonderful blessing and will be a huge step forward for next-gen consoles and gaming in the living room. And thankfully we have LG with their OLED C9+ products that's pushing forward and getting this technology out in the markets in time (epic fail from Sony's TV division in contrast, I wonder how their meetings with PlayStation went down).
I'm guessing Fortnite might be one of the first 120hz experiences we will see on the next-gen consoles. But for most experiences, just for developers to dare aim for 60hz would be an enormous upgrade (pushing past 60 and we're seeing diminishing returns, 30->60 is equivalent leap to 60->165+).
I'm guessing Fortnite might be one of the first 120hz experiences we will see on the next-gen consoles. But for most experiences, just for developers to dare aim for 60hz would be an enormous upgrade (pushing past 60 and we're seeing diminishing returns, 30->60 is equivalent leap to 60->165+).
Yeah, they're getting there at least. Even some mid ranges have 120Hz panels like some Vizio models. Just wonder how consumer upgrade patterns will actually make it even somewhat commonplace though.
Fortunately, running PC games at 1440p 120Hz on my LG C9 is such a lovely experience. Roll on 3080ti or Big Navi with HDMI 2.1.
I think the main obstacle for that would be software, not hardware. They need to adapt OSX for arm, and achieve a large degree of software compatibility. I'm sure they are working on it though. Battery capacity on MacBooks are going through the roof once it's achieved.
120 fps is fine, but the game looks veeeery cut down from even the switch version ( yes I'm aware it runs at 30fps but still)
I don't think I would enjoy playing in this mode
I don't think I would enjoy playing in this mode
I only own a monitor so I haven't really encountered this, but don't a lot of tvs still cap out at 60fps?
This could be a big problem if some next gen games are going higher than 60fps.
This could be a big problem if some next gen games are going higher than 60fps.
GPU matters the most in pushing out frames.
Bro.
The Jaguar is bad because the frame latency will be atrocious.
iPhones might be getting a version more aggressive with switching between 60/120 than the Pros which are 99% battery and charge off 12W power warts
