-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
FootyEra 19/20 Season |OT| CrowdNoise.mp3
- Thread starter Syder
- Start date
- Status
I think that's also the best pick, but UEFA might just pull a.... UEFA on all of us and do something extremely dumb.
Some impressive CL moments. Too bad football is getting cancelled for a while with Rugani starting a chain reaction that stops CL and EL, probably championships too.
The European Club Association would burn down UEFA's headquarters if UEFA decided to hold the Euros in December/January.
Qatar is a one off imo, not going to happen again, it's not like other confederations are pushing for a late year WC and the money is in Europe anyway.
The next time an african nation gets the world cup it will probably have to be played in the winter too like the ANC
Hope it happens. It would potentially solve the calendar these suspensions are causing.
Won't most leagues / championships / teams have some sort of insurance to help cover them financially for the losses all this rescheduling and cancelling will cause? I'm asking because that news about UEFA asking govts to let the Euros happen since most cities will have medical facilities to deal with the virus spread skeezes me out so much. Just shift the thing to 2021!
PSG said that playing behind closed doors cost them 6 million euros tonight. I doubt any insurance plan covers this
Win the title at Anfield and not be allowed to witness the crowd go mental. Fuck sake. Please don't let this be implemented yet. Just let us get to April.
Yeah, I figured it wouldn't cover most of the costs. Would be especially harmful to the lower tier teams I'm sure. Still, most sensible situation if the spread continues to escalate would be to move the Euros to free up some calendar space and postpone the league games.
It is unfortunate that pool lost, but does anyone else think away away goals should be scrapped after going into extra time? Doesn't that give the team playing away second a disadvantage since hypothetically the team playing away from home second gets more time to get an away goal? Firmino finally got his Anfield goal too haha
They only have more time if the other team doesn't do their job.
It would be hilarious if this happened ngl
Obviously not gonna happen in the epl but it might happen in serie a. Lazio would be pissed if Juve are crowned champions before the competition is over. They still need to play against each other too.
They both scored one goal. Which team wasnt doing their job?
Then the argument would be whoever is home the second leg has the "advantage" since they have extra time at home.
TFW UEFA holds the Euros during standard international breaks during the season.
Yea they did their job as much as Atleti in the first leg tho? I am defo a pool fan and I'm pointing it out now specifically 'cause of the situation, but I've always felt it was silly. But that's always been the case, whaddya gonna do right?
I guess but there's no quantifiable home advantage you know? But I get it.
Liverpool. They didn't come away with anything from the first leg (error) and had double the time to wrap it up in the second and didn't.
After baiting Atlético with "Wait till you play in Anfield" the salt mount must be higher than the Queen Victoria monument
He is salty, but I kinda agree. They have the talent to play some decent football, hell I bet they could even become a proper attacking force if they wanted to. Alas, with Simeone it's not to be... and to be fair, it has worked for them.
This really can be turned around, too. Liverpool has such great players and plays such a spectacular football, only to fumble the most important matches in the span of a few weeks losing their unbeatable run and getting eliminated from every cup by early March.
Atletico is what it is. I don't like their football personally, it's ugly to watch. It works, however.
Liverpool would have needed 2 other goals even if there was no difference between home and away goals. I don't think this rule affected the result that much.
insurances usually cover incurred damages and would explicitly carve out loss of profit
he did say that he is a "sore looser".
funny because these two are probably the most insane coaches out there. klopp became tame in liverpool thoughGet fucked Liverpool
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-infobae.s3.amazonaws.com/public/LTRC4YC4CNE4BELHYZFBSKWNAU.jpg)
Changes a lot. They would have been tied when it went to 2-1. Changes the whole climate of the game. But like I said I get it, it is what it is. I still feel once a game enters extra time it should just go back to a normal match.
Allison was sorely missed and Adrian was immense the other times he stepped in for him, feel bad for him on the first goal especially.
I kinda agree and disagree with this. It makes sense for each team to get 90 mins of being able to score away goals and 90 mins to try and prevent away goals. The problem is the extra time is still played at the home team's stadium and so they still have home advantage for it. Last night Liverpool had the entirety of Anfield not only cheering for them but booing Atletico every chance they got.
Yeah, he was salty but literally prefaced it with "I recognize what a sore loser I am".
He ain't wrong either, Atletico is hard to watch but if it works it works I guess. Liverpool should have won with that performance though.
- Status