• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Azuran

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,563
Look at his fans. His fans helped him. All he had to do was sing and dance. Remember when he danced at his court appearance and mutha fuckas were just cheering like he wasnt an accused pedophile. Just imagine.

Or that thread when word of the doc first came out and the first few pages were just people defending him with all they had.
People come with these ideas of celebrities based on their music and the blanks they fill in with their imagination.
Like honestly, if the neighborhood creep said and did the shit MJ was known to do before all this he wouldve been gone. We gotta stop giving these celebrities power to hurt kids and get away with it.


Fucking disgusting. Michael Jackson stans are truly the scum of this planet.

That fact that he didn't go down after the accusations first came out says everything you need to know.
 

Deleted member 12790

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
24,537
We now have people referring to borderline child porn with full frontal nudity as "pretty nice art".

Fucking hell.

Bro, earlier in this topic someone said:

And the best excuse we can come up with for this is that "he was groomed/fucked up in the head"? Fuck that shit.

regarding why Wade didn't come forward as a kid. Same postered made it very clear, multiple times, that he considered the victims liars and fruads.

We've entered the twilight zone.
 

Deleted member 20892

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,958
It amazes (and enrages) me how this topic is being handled. Why is this topic, this ONE topic, so hands-off by moderators? It took over a thousand posts for a moderator to appear in the documentary thread, and even then he was just a participant. How is this thread not a graveyard for all the disgusting posts calling the accusers liars? Mods are very pro-active at disciplining any poster who questions race, gender or trans issues, so why is it allowed in this case? Because he made Thriller? There's no mod edit in the first post, there's no thread marks, there's no guidance at all on what is acceptable to say here. Disgusting.
.

I dont think MJ showed the porn to the kids, he probably had it in his nightstand and the kids rummaged and found them. If thats a crime then my parents are criminals. The other stuff, MJ isn't your average person, he had no childhood and wanted to see what it was like through these "child porn" books. "boys will be boys" has pretty nice art depicting the joys of growing up as a child, from what I can sample online.

I get the point of "if this was anyone else, you'd call them a pedo" argument, and I would call this person a pedo absolutely in that case, but I don't think its because we're blind since we love MJ so much. It's because its MJ was one messed up dude and to me its believable he actually wanted to do all of this weird stuff innocently.
...................
 

Andrew-Ryan

Banned
Dec 4, 2018
645
User Banned (2 weeks): Bad faith argumentation: claiming to have no opinion but then repeatedly providing justifications for Jackson's behavior; inflammatory false equivalence and obfuscation regarding child grooming allegations
so, your contention is that Safechuck is lying.
No, like I said I have no opinion on this matter. I can't prove/don't know which of MJ or Safechuck is lying or telling the truth. I can see either situation being true.
Do you understand how context works? You don't befriend children, groom them, hang out with them, sleep with them, and characterize it as friendship.
I don't see an issue with befriending kids or hanging out with them, again that's perfectly normal. The "groom them" is a point of contention that the MJ camp denies, so I don't know why you're stating it as a matter of objective fact. Sleeping with kids is insanely weird, but then MJ was a very, very weird person. Don't think anyone would dispute that. As others kids have stated they slept with MJ and state he never sexually abused them, so it's clear that MJ sleeping with kids it's not a slam dunk for him abusing them.
Gee why do people assume the worst about a guy who sleeps with children and buys them jewelry?
I never said people shouldn't assume the worse in MJ, I think that's a plausible opinion. I also think thinking that MJ was just a very very strange guy that didn't abuse kids is also a plausible opinion.
My point about being friends with kids was irrespective of this MJ case, I outright stated that in my statement incase you missed it.
 

NinjaScooter

Member
Oct 25, 2017
54,057
If people said the shit being said here about Cosby or R Kelly or Kavanaugh's accusers, they'd be nuked. At least be consistent.
 
Rules of engagement

aerie

wonky
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
8,023
It amazes (and enrages) me how this topic is being handled. Why is this topic, this ONE topic, so hands-off by moderators? It took over a thousand posts for a moderator to appear in the documentary thread, and even then he was just a participant. How is this thread not a graveyard for all the disgusting posts calling the accusers liars? Mods are very pro-active at disciplining any poster who questions race, gender or trans issues, so why is it allowed in this case? Because he made Thriller? There's no mod edit in the first post, there's no thread marks, there's no guidance at all on what is acceptable to say here. Disgusting.
Here is our statement from the previous thread, which has now been included in the OP
Official Staff Communication
This topic is especially hard to adjudicate given the long and tortured history of the cases, the outcome of previous trials, and the fact that Michael Jackson is deceased. That said, we've been actioning members who attacked the accusers as liars etc. A number of posts are still being reviewed to ensure consistency.

For future Michael Jackson threads please observe these rules of engagement:
  • You are free to presume MJ's guilt and address him accordingly.
  • You can reference inconsistencies in testimony and past acquittals.
  • You cannot label the accusers as liars or frauds or similar.
  • If you can't observe these rules or can't accept them, do not participate. Metacommentary derails will be banned.
We've been working hard to stay as active as we can on this subject, but as a kind reminder, please do report any posts you see that you feel warrant review from the staff. Thank you.
 

Messi

I am leaving this community!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,610
There are plenty of regular people out there that didn't experience a childhood...they aren't sleeping in beds with children and other such shit. I hate that excuse.
 
Oct 25, 2017
7,501
I dont think MJ showed the porn to the kids, he probably had it in his nightstand and the kids rummaged and found them. If thats a crime then my parents are criminals. The other stuff, MJ isn't your average person, he had no childhood and wanted to see what it was like through these "child porn" books. "boys will be boys" has pretty nice art depicting the joys of growing up as a child, from what I can sample online.

I get the point of "if this was anyone else, you'd call them a pedo" argument, and I would call this person a pedo absolutely in that case, but I don't think its because we're blind since we love MJ so much. It's because its MJ was one messed up dude and to me its believable he actually wanted to do all of this weird stuff innocently.

Your post is disgusting, and yeah fuck Michael Jackson.
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
No, like I said I have no opinion on this matter. I can't prove/don't know which of MJ or Safechuck is lying or telling the truth. I can see either situation being true.

I don't see an issue with befriending kids or hanging out with them, again that's perfectly normal. The "groom them" is a point of contention that the MJ camp denies, so I don't know why you're stating it as a matter of objective fact. Sleeping with kids is insanely weird, but then MJ was a very, very weird person. Don't think anyone would dispute that. As others kids have stated they slept with MJ and state he never sexually abused them, so it's clear that MJ sleeping with kids it's not a slam dunk for him abusing them.
Stop this. Fucking stop. Sleeping alone with strange children is psychological abuse, especially accompanied with the grooming process he used to get there.

This thread is disgusting.
 

Lone_Prodigy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,412
I feel like this thread is a good opportunity to educate others on the kind of person MJ was, but it's getting lost because people seem to be unable or unwilling to accept alternate perspectives.

Also I think the name calling and strong language is uncalled for, unnecessary, and not helpful for proving one's point.
 

Deleted member 12790

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
24,537
No, like I said I have no opinion on this matter. I can't prove/don't know which of MJ or Safechuck is lying or telling the truth. I can see either situation being true.


This is some disingenous bullshit. You say you have no opinion in the matter, yet all you post is outlandish justifications for why Safechuck could be lying. Look at all your posts ITT, you have not yet once questioned why MJ's defense would lie in this situation.

You're not nearly as clever as you think you are.

I don't see an issue with befriending kids or hanging out with them, again that's perfectly normal. The "groom them" is a point of contention that the MJ camp denies, so I don't know why you're stating it as a matter of objective fact.

No they fucking don't. They readily corroborate most of MJ's action. They just see it as innocous. They do not "deny" the actions at all.

As others kids have stated they slept with MJ and state he never sexually abused them, so it's clear that MJ sleeping with kids it's not a slam dunk for him abusing them.

People like you are disgusting. You love to use these kids as evidence, but never quote them. So let's do that, here's a quote from a kid that MJ's camp loves to promote around about how he never sexually abused him, who isn't suing MJ, who wasn't in the documentary, on this completely non-sexual sleep over:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/michael-jackson-called-rubba-rubba-13912812

"When I slept in his bed, we wore just boxer shorts and he would put his arm around me and push his body to my body, like you would with a girlfriend.

"He would put our bodies on each other and kiss me on the head and cheek. I woke many times and his hands were on me... one hand on the top of my legs and one hand around me.

"When he was high on his medication he would get closer in the same way as when a man gets drunk. It disinhibited him.

"He'd pull me closer and be grabbing me more and kissing me more on the head and on the cheek, He would also stroke my hair.

"He never carried out an explicit sexual act on me, but there were sexual intentions.

"He must have been getting something out of it sexually. I feel now like he was testing me, seeing how far he could go."


this is the VERY person you just fucking brought up. This is the evidence you yourself use to justify that MJ isn't a pedophile.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,898
I don't see an issue with befriending kids or hanging out with them, again that's perfectly normal. The "groom them" is a point of contention that the MJ camp denies, so I don't know why you're stating it as a matter of objective fact. Sleeping with kids is insanely weird, but then MJ was a very, very weird person. Don't think anyone would dispute that. As others kids have stated they slept with MJ and state he never sexually abused them, so it's clear that MJ sleeping with kids it's not a slam dunk for him abusing them.
Twilight zone indeed.
 

Sapiens

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,044
I dont think MJ showed the porn to the kids, he probably had it in his nightstand and the kids rummaged and found them. If thats a crime then my parents are criminals. The other stuff, MJ isn't your average person, he had no childhood and wanted to see what it was like through these "child porn" books. "boys will be boys" has pretty nice art depicting the joys of growing up as a child, from what I can sample online.

I get the point of "if this was anyone else, you'd call them a pedo" argument, and I would call this person a pedo absolutely in that case, but I don't think its because we're blind since we love MJ so much. It's because its MJ was one messed up dude and to me its believable he actually wanted to do all of this weird stuff innocently.
What's it like just parroting the same thing MJ defenders have been saying for years?
 

Bakercat

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,153
'merica
Little off topic, but i'm a little over an hour into the documentary and i want to vomit from sickness watching this. Jesus...
 

Andrew-Ryan

Banned
Dec 4, 2018
645
Stop this. Fucking stop. Sleeping alone with strange children is psychological abuse, especially accompanied with the grooming process he used to get there.

This thread is disgusting.
This is some disingenous bullshit. You say you have no opinion in the matter, yet all you post is outlandish justifications for why Safechuck could be lying. Look at all your posts ITT, you have not yet once questioned why MJ's defense would lie in this situation.

You're not nearly as clever as you think you are.



No they fucking don't. They readily corroborate most of MJ's action. They just see it as innocous. They do not "deny" the actions at all.



People like you are disgusting. You love to use these kids as evidence, but never quote them. So let's do that, here's a quote from a kid that MJ's camp loves to promote around about how he never sexually abused him, who isn't suing MJ, who wasn't in the documentary, on this completely non-sexual sleep over:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/michael-jackson-called-rubba-rubba-13912812

"When I slept in his bed, we wore just boxer shorts and he would put his arm around me and push his body to my body, like you would with a girlfriend.

"He would put our bodies on each other and kiss me on the head and cheek. I woke many times and his hands were on me... one hand on the top of my legs and one hand around me.

"When he was high on his medication he would get closer in the same way as when a man gets drunk. It disinhibited him.

"He'd pull me closer and be grabbing me more and kissing me more on the head and on the cheek, He would also stroke my hair.

"He never carried out an explicit sexual act on me, but there were sexual intentions.

"He must have been getting something out of it sexually. I feel now like he was testing me, seeing how far he could go."

this is the VERY person you just fucking brought up. This is the evidence you yourself use to justify that MJ isn't a pedophile.
Twilight zone indeed.
Having a discussion about video games is at time almost impossible on here so I'm not sure why I keep forgetting that having discussions about other topics is many many levels beyond impossible.

If any of you seriously want to have a rational and civil discussion then I'm more than happy to have one. But I'm not going to have what's already starting to descend into a mindnumbing arguments strewn with petty insults, stupid accusations, completely mischaracterizations of points and just outright strawmen. If that's what you want to have then well done you've succeed in shutting down another discussion just like you wanted to from the start.
 

impingu1984

Member
Oct 31, 2017
3,413
UK
This thread is fucking wild.... Some shameful opinions and hero defence forcing in here.

Sorry your favourite singer was a pedo...

Stop shaming victims please....
 

Deleted member 12790

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
24,537
Having a discussion about video games is at time almost impossible on here so I'm not sure why I keep forgetting that having discussions about other topics is many many levels beyond impossible.

If any of you seriously want to have a rational and civil discussion then I'm more than happy to have one. But I'm not going to have what's already starting to descend into a mindnumbing arguments strewn with petty insults, stupid accusations, completely mischaracterizations of points and just outright strawmen. If that's what you want to have then well done you've succeed in shutting down another discussion just like you wanted to from the start.

If only we were as rational is you, mr "There is nothing wrong with a grown man sleeping with children, because that grown man is literally peter pan"
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
Having a discussion about video games is at time almost impossible on here so I'm not sure why I keep forgetting that having discussions about other topics is many many levels beyond impossible.

If any of you seriously want to have a rational and civil discussion then I'm more than happy to have one. But I'm not going to have what's already starting to descend into a mindnumbing arguments strewn with petty insults, stupid accusations, completely mischaracterizations of points and just outright strawmen. If that's what you want to have then well done you've succeed in shutting down another discussion just like you wanted to from the start.
You claim to want a rational discussion white simultaneously defending a grown man sleeping with strange children.

If you can't see that grooming and sleeping with children is abuse, don't get hurt when people call your posts disgusting.

Because that's what they are.
 

Ketkat

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,727
It's too bad you can't discuss this in the official thread. That one is closed for some reason. *shrugs*

Yeah, I'm really not sure why that thread was perma-closed. The documentary had only been out for a week, and there's still a lot of people only getting around to watching it just now.
 

mjc

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
5,879
I don't see an issue with befriending kids or hanging out with them, again that's perfectly normal. The "groom them" is a point of contention that the MJ camp denies, so I don't know why you're stating it as a matter of objective fact. Sleeping with kids is insanely weird, but then MJ was a very, very weird person. Don't think anyone would dispute that. As others kids have stated they slept with MJ and state he never sexually abused them, so it's clear that MJ sleeping with kids it's not a slam dunk for him abusing them.

If a bunch of kids played around a wasp's nest and only a couple got stung, those other kids would consider themselves lucky would they not? Doesn't change that fact that a couple of them did get stung, though.
 

Andrew-Ryan

Banned
Dec 4, 2018
645
You claim to want a rational discussion white simultaneously defend a grown man sleeping with strange children.

If you can't see that grooming and sleeping with children is abuse, don't get hurt when people call your posts disgusting.
If honestly do want to have a good faith and civil discussion then can you quote to me the exact comments I made that said it was Ok from MJ to "groom kids" and that it was ok for him to sleep with them.

I can throw strawman arguments back at you, but notice how I'm genuinely interested in having a good faith discussion so I don't. Unlike you.
 

Oligarchenemy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,332
Having a discussion about video games is at time almost impossible on here so I'm not sure why I keep forgetting that having discussions about other topics is many many levels beyond impossible.

If any of you seriously want to have a rational and civil discussion then I'm more than happy to have one. But I'm not going to have what's already starting to descend into a mindnumbing arguments strewn with petty insults, stupid accusations, completely mischaracterizations of points and just outright strawmen. If that's what you want to have then well done you've succeed in shutting down another discussion just like you wanted to from the start.

The discussion you're attempting to have is one where you try to justify a grown man sleeping naked in a bed with children.

I think I'm perfectly ok with you not having the ability to discuss that.
 

Deleted member 283

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,288
Yeah, I'm really not sure why that thread was perma-closed. The documentary had only been out for a week, and there's still a lot of people only getting around to watching it just now.
It's too bad you can't discuss this in the official thread. That one is closed for some reason. *shrugs*
Yeah, when I saw that thread was closed, I thought it was only being closed temporarily to review reported posts or something, which would have been completely understandable and I know the mods need that time every now and then. Very disappointed that it's just permanently locked.
 

Deleted member 20892

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,958
I don't see an issue with befriending kids or hanging out with them, again that's perfectly normal. The "groom them" is a point of contention that the MJ camp denies, so I don't know why you're stating it as a matter of objective fact. Sleeping with kids is insanely weird, but then MJ was a very, very weird person. Don't think anyone would dispute that. As others kids have stated they slept with MJ and state he never sexually abused them, so it's clear that MJ sleeping with kids it's not a slam dunk for him abusing them.
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
I don't see an issue with befriending kids or hanging out with them, again that's perfectly normal. The "groom them" is a point of contention that the MJ camp denies, so I don't know why you're stating it as a matter of objective fact. Sleeping with kids is insanely weird, but then MJ was a very, very weird person. Don't think anyone would dispute that. As others kids have stated they slept with MJ and state he never sexually abused them, so it's clear that MJ sleeping with kids it's not a slam dunk for him abusing them.
He groomed them, fact. He befriended them and built a fucking theme park to isolate them and admitted to sleeping with them alone. This is before we even get to the accusations. All of this was out in the open.

Second bolded. You just claimed that sleeping, alone, with strange children isn't clear abuse as long as there was no sexual abuse. This is wrong.

I didn't strawman shit, these are your own words.
 
Mod Post - On metacommentary

Volimar

volunteer forum janitor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,236
Official Staff Communication
The other threads were locked because they weren't being used to discuss the documentary or Michael Jackson so much as they were being used to take shots at members across threads or try to rile up trouble for the staff. We are looking at rebooting the main thread. We have been working tirelessly under high stress to moderate these topics and have actioned many posters who violated our policies.

If this thread proves unmanageable it'll go the same way as the others, and that serves no one in the end. Get back on topic.
 

kyoya

Member
Dec 26, 2017
117
I wonder how many other news outlets have staff scouring their archives looking for all Michael Jackson footage of him shopping with young boys?
Surprised Inside Edition and ET didn't re-air those segments.
 

vestan

#REFANTAZIO SWEEP
Member
Dec 28, 2017
24,604
Look at his fans. His fans helped him. All he had to do was sing and dance. Remember when he danced at his court appearance and mutha fuckas were just cheering like he wasnt an accused pedophile. Just imagine.

Or that thread when word of the doc first came out and the first few pages were just people defending him with all they had.
People come with these ideas of celebrities based on their music and the blanks they fill in with their imagination.
Like honestly, if the neighborhood creep said and did the shit MJ was known to do before all this he wouldve been gone. We gotta stop giving these celebrities power to hurt kids and get away with it.

The comments on that video are fucking disgusting, holy shit. All these people are fucking suckers, man.

KOoDJME.png
 

Ketkat

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,727
Official Staff Communication

The other threads were locked because they weren't being used to discuss the documentary or Michael Jackson so much as they were being used to take shots at members across threads or try to rile up anger against the staff. We have been working tirelessly under high stress to moderate these topics and have actioned many posters who violated our policies.

If this thread proves unmanageable it'll go the same way as the others, and that serves no one in the end. Get back on topic.

Well, that just isn't true. That documentary thread is 3500 posts long, and the vast majority of it was about the documentary on hand. It does suck that people were taking potshots at other people in the end, but talking about the way that our society allows abuse to run rampant, especially when it's in the limelight for so long like Michael Jackson is an incredibly important topic. It's vital that people understand and see the lengths that people will go to defend abuse, look the other way, or put the blame on the victims so that we can all grow and do better as a society. That isn't going to happen by threatening to shut down every topic when it starts to get slightly derailed. We can't just "get back on topic" because those topics are shut down completely and we lose our chance to discuss these topics with the care and focus that they need when this happens.

This documentary is still new, it's a little over a week old, and we just can't have a thread on it to discuss it while the rest of the world and media is because of a couple of people? That's backwards and doesn't make any sense.
 

Volimar

volunteer forum janitor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,236
Well, that just isn't true. That documentary thread is 3500 posts long, and the vast majority of it was about the documentary on hand. It does suck that people were taking potshots at other people in the end, but talking about the way that our society allows abuse to run rampant, especially when it's in the limelight for so long like Michael Jackson is an incredibly important topic. It's vital that people understand and see the lengths that people will go to defend abuse, look the other way, or put the blame on the victims so that we can all grow and do better as a society. That isn't going to happen by threatening to shut down every topic when it starts to get slightly derailed. We can't just "get back on topic" because those topics are shut down completely and we lose our chance to discuss these topics with the care and focus that they need when this happens.

This documentary is still new, it's a little over a week old, and we just can't have a thread on it to discuss it while the rest of the world and media is because of a couple of people? That's backwards and doesn't make any sense.


We're working on rebooting the documentary topic. Discussion will be able to continue.
 

Sutton Dagger

Member
Oct 27, 2017
741
I haven't watched the documentary myself but I've read about what it contains so I'll just say this. I've been a massive fan of his music my whole life, have all his CD's/dvds and always request his music to come on whenever I get the chance.

But.... I can't in good conscience actively listen to him anymore or support him in any way. I don't know how people are continuing to support him when it seems by all accounts he groomed and very likely molested these kids. I understand having idols or whatever but fuck, I can't even fathom being ok with someone who did these things...
 

hombremalo

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,959
More people will come forward both abused men and people surrounding him that didn't speak up at it's time. He will be remembered as the monster he was and not for his music.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,898
We can't just "get back on topic" because those topics are shut down completely and we lose our chance to discuss these topics with the care and focus that they need when this happens.
Agree with the whole post, but this is particularly true of the issue. With the original thread permanently locked we lose out on all the discussion as a reference from release until time of lock. You can't even reply/quote posts to reference as the option isn't there when locked.

The thread was massively important and also a huge boost to any potential victims of child abuse to see the ongoing rebuke against disgusting and/or wholly ignorant posts.

The main thread should have been where supplementary articles like this video, and that the UK have removed all the 'MJ innocent' bus ads. So that it can be discussed with the relevant context to hand and mind.
 

Ciao

Member
Jun 14, 2018
4,829
Will watch the documentary this week end, as it's 4h long I heard? I just looked at 4/5 pages here and in the DmC5 topic and it looks like some really serious shit surfaced.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,898
We're working on rebooting the documentary topic. Discussion will be able to continue.
Thank you, but please try to do so where all existing discussion isn't wiped clean. There's a lot of historic posts in it that are useful to reference and a lot of rebuttals made to common ignorance and rebuked points.

It would be a shame to lose that context in the ongoing discussion.
 

Deleted member 12790

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
24,537
Will watch the documentary this week end, as it's 4h long I heard? I just looked at 4/5 pages here and in the DmC5 topic and it looks like some really serious shit surfaced.

5 hours actually, there is a 1 hour long epilogue called "After Neverland" hosted by Oprah where she interviews the two people and the director of the film, giving a slightly more recent update. It lets them, for example, talk about how they've dealt with the backlash and even directly take on some of the MJ Defender's talking points.

More than anything else, that epilogue is most damning because you see James Safechuck, who was the more emotional of the two, without any editing at all, and the guy looks like a complete wreck on stage. It's really heart breaking.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,898
Thank you, but please try to do so where all existing discussion isn't wiped clean. There's a lot of historic posts in it that are useful to reference and a lot of rebuttals made to common ignorance and rebuked points.

It would be a shame to lose that context in the ongoing discussion.
The documentary thread has been rebooted. Please take note of the guidelines in the OP.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/le...rrently-94-on-rotten-tomatoes-read-op.105393/
Ah, ouch lol.
Thank you for opening a focal topic up all the same. It's needed for such an important issue and release.
 

Embedded

Member
Oct 27, 2017
616
I'm never gonna listen to his music again. Didn't know most of these things and it's pretty clear to me now that he was a monster. A well hidden monster who created interesting little stories about his past to cover up his crimes.

To those who are still skeptical, i hope you approach all matters in your life with that amount of skepticism, because if you don't, you are the kind of people i wouldn't help get up.