Fucking disgusting. Republicans are the worst, and DeathSantis and his regime in Florida are below the bottom of the barrel.
Right-wingers continually feel the need to use the full power of the state to enforce some imagined social hierarchy, one where they believe they have a God-given right to be at the top, and to that end they will put considerable effort into marginalizing, oppressing, or even killing anyone that they've deemed part of an out-group (i.e., anyone that's not a straight white cis Christian). They've lost the legal ability to do that time and again, but they simply regroup and keep doing everything they think they can legally get away with, targeting still legally marginalized groups in the most overt ways (e.g, this anti-trans bullshit), and continuing to look for ever more subtle means of stripping nominally protected groups of their rights (e.g., trying to find ways to disenfranchise black voters or prevent marriage licenses from being issued to same-sex couples).
Trans people's only federal legal protection is a recent Supreme Court decision (Bostock v. Clayton County) and only protects them from employment discrimination, so conservatives feel this gives them carte blanche to treat trans people like second-class citizens by passing shitty laws and regulations. If conservatives had their way, civil and political rights in the U.S. would be rolled back to where they were 200 years ago. This is why we need federal protection for trans people, but Congress is simply sitting on the issue. The Dems have less than nine months to do something, because control of Congress is likely to go back to the GOP for at least a few years after the midterms.
Conservatives might say "Oh, but look! The Florida DoH cited their sources!", but three cherry-picked studies, including one from a biased source (the Catholic Medical Association) does not a scientific consensus make. Every major medical organization and every meta-analysis I've seen affirms the opposite of what the transphobes in Florida's government say. If you dig enough, you can always find a paper that expresses a conclusion contrary to the consensus, something cranks like to do to support their denial of the consensus. Even if the paper doesn't explicitly make the point the crank is trying to make, the latter will try to misrepresent it to make it fit their preconceived notions.
To use a case I'm familiar with from another field, noted (and now deceased) astronomer Halton Arp got papers published in scientific journals even if his conclusions were the exact opposite of the consensus (he believed the universe was not expanding), but that doesn't mean the conclusions he reached in his research were correct. But that didn't stop cranks from latching on to his papers as if they were ironclad evidence that the consensus view in cosmology was wrong.
The thing is, most fields of science and their pseudoscience counterparts don't have an obvious political dimension to them. Nobody in government is going to take the claims of contrarians and cranks like Arp or Velikovsky or von Daniken and use them as a basis for crafting policy. But when science touches on things like economics, race, or sex, you can damn well bet your life that every right-winger with an axe to grind will deny the consensus and latch on to some random junk science, because they don't like how science keeps undermining their worldview.
The modern conservative movement is the most vile and dangerous political movement in decades, though honestly they're just an extension of the same bigoted bullshit that's been pervasive in this country since its founding. They never went away. They regrouped, passed their bullshit from generation to generation, and now they've cranked up the cruelty to eleven.