Being mounted counts for a lot.
Kyle and Forde are still easily the worst Cavaliers in the entire series outside of pure Jeigens
The heck's a pure Jeigen?
Being mounted counts for a lot.
Kyle and Forde are still easily the worst Cavaliers in the entire series outside of pure Jeigens
Jeigans that are actual Jeigans and dont remain good for all or most of the game.
Jeigans that are actual Jeigans and dont remain good for all or most of the game.
Really depends on the game. For the localized games that's certainly true, sure.The vast majority of them are good and contribute more than the vast majority of units in their respective games
I always bench Jeigens so as not to have them sponge up all the experience. I'm sure if I had the patience for Lunatic+ they'd be more useful but I don't so...
Really depends on the game. For the localized games that's certainly true, sure.
It's true for the vast majority of FE games. Base stats > growths, always, and contributions > endgame potential.
Sure, never said otherwise. "All the localized entries" IS the majority of FE entries. I never said 'Jeigans suck' or anything of the sort.
Kyle and Forde are still easily the worst Cavaliers in the entire series outside of pure Jeigens
That is one of the reasons why i don't like using kids much, even if they are considered broken in awakening
Again, yeah you could argue that and make a case for it. I'd probably even agree with you. When I say, "they are worse than every cavalier outside of a few Jeigans", that doesnt mean that I'm saying for sure that they are better than any Jeigan in the series. I'm just saying it's possible that they might be, whereas they are definitely worse than any other red/green cavalier pair.I don't think "or the localized games that's certainly true, sure." is a necessary qualifier. It's true for every FE game.
As for Kyle and Forde.
You're basically saying they're the worst cavalier cavaliers outside of pure Jeigans, but that isn't true either. I'd wager that every Jeigan is better than those two.
The kids units in Awakening (outside of a select few) are garbage
Amelia isn't a fair comparison, she's a trainee unit that doesnt even start mounted.Excluding jeigans (who are good) Forde and Kyle are both better than Alec, Noish, Treck, and Amelia off the top of my head.
Already seen this video and disagree with its conclusion given how selective it is with its "Jeigen" example (let's use arguably the best unit relative to the game's overall difficulty in the entire series who boasts decent growth rates for a pre-promoted unit as an example). Your typical Jeigen is nowhere near as useful as the likes of Titania or Seth outside of the early game, nor do they have the same ability to stay relevant as anything but a meat shield (which is what they tend to end up being in most of my playthroughs, frankly. That or early game item storage depending on the entry).
Finn is not a JeiganIt doesn't matter if you disagree, your premise is faulty.
EXP is never "wasted" on Jeigans for a number of reasons, such as your return on EXP not being that huge to due how leveling up works in FE. Avoiding using Jeigans to not soak up EXP" is an inefficient way of playing, and not even in an "omg i'm doing a LTC." You are literally saying "I don't want to use the best unit at my disposal at their peak in order to make shitty units better down the line, despite the fact that the returns are rarely worth it." Good units will keep up regardless, in spite of Jeigans "wasting" EXP. Meanwhile, the units who tend to be bad need EXP baby fed to them.
Also "Your typical Jeigen" tend to remain useful for the majority of the game. Jeigan himself, who is extremely dominant in both FE1 and FE11 due to his bases and starting loadup (and reclass options in FE11). FE7 Marcus is literally usable from beginning to end. I haven't played FE5 but I've heard Finn is busted, Seth is obviously OP, Titania is OP, Jakob is stupidly busted etc.
FE6 Marcus on Hard Mode, FE10 Sothe and Frederick (Lunatic) are pretty much the only Jeigan I can think of that are being hard benched after a certain point, and even then, they never "wastes" EXP because their combat contributions far outweigh giving a crappy unit more EXP.
They're pretty bad, but they're both definitely better than Fiona.Being mounted counts for a lot.
Kyle and Forde are still easily the worst Cavaliers in the entire series outside of pure Jeigens
Arran in the higher difficulties of New Mystery.
Idk, on harder difficulties, early game tends to be the hardest part of the game. Like:I don't see what's the point of saying certain units are better in early maps when aside from FE6 Hard mode, you can do just fine without them since those maps generally are small and simple anyway.
earlygame is usually harder than lategame due to the fact that lategame you've trained up enough juggernauts to curbstomp everything, with the exception of FE12 and to a lesser extent FE6I don't see what's the point of saying certain units are better in early maps when aside from FE6 Hard mode, you can do just fine without them since those maps generally are small and simple anyway.
FE5 also mitigates this to an extent, thought mostly by making it more difficult to train up a select few units courtesy of the stamina system.earlygame is usually harder than lategame due to the fact that lategame you've trained up enough juggernauts to curbstomp everything, with the exception of FE12 and to a lesser extent FE6
Idk, on harder difficulties, early game tends to be the hardest part of the game. Like:
FE6: it's when the hit rates are worst. Your units are very weak and often 2 or 3 hit koed.
FE7: your starting units are really weak. They all have notable flaws. Lowen's offense is awful, Matthew has no attack, Rebecca is lol, Oswin can't double, Eliwood is frail AND also struggles to double, Guy is frail. Like, the only unit other than Marcus that has good offense and defense before noble lady of caelin is Hector.
FE8: ez game yeah
FE9: western version is quite easy. While Maniac mode is also easy, enemies are like 6HKOed by anyone that's not Titania on the early game lol. You legitimately can't beat earlygame chapters on maniac without Titania because you will run out of weapons.
FE10: We all know earlygame is by far the hardest part of this game
FE11: Good luck beating the bosses of the early chapters of this game without Jeigan on H5
FE12: Prologue does make your starting army strong.
FE13: Frederick is like the only unit not 2HKOed at base on Lunatic. Though Robin can catch up by chapter 1, that's requires heavy babying, which makes Fred absolutey essential
FE14 and 15: Yeah, Jeigans aren't that helpful, though Paladin Jakob can be really busted.
So yeah, this doesn't apply to FE4, 5, 8, 12, 14 or 15, but applies to 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 13.
I'll admit that my knowledge of the fanbase is limited.Maybe I just don't search out fandoms a whole lot online, but the general idea that anyone has to "defend Fates" from the great wave of people who really love Echoes is strange to me.
I don't see a lot of super huge fans of Echoes, it's mainly just people going "ah, that game was refreshing". Fates has had plenty of fans and defenders and is, to my knowledge, the best selling FE game.
Kyle and Forde have some of the absolute best red/green cavalier designs in the series, IMO. Compare them to the mechanically superior Kent and Sain, and they look worlds more creative and colorful. Kent and Sain are about as vanilla as you can get, aesthetically.
I'll admit that my knowledge of the fanbase is limited.
I feel I see Fates' issues get used often to make Echoes look better, but maybe that's not as common as it seems to me.
It's not enough that they like Echoes, they need to prove that anyone who enjoyed Fates was a disgusting pedophile otaku.
...You talk about dishonesty in the same breath as that sentence? Fates is certainly derided a lot in the fanbase, but I've never seen that level of hyperbole—definitely never on this forum.
There's a lot of criticism of Awakening and Fates' sexualization of minors visually and mechanically, but that isn't the same thing as equating any esteem for the game with pedophilia. Christ. There are a lot of reasons to enjoy each 3DS game, depending on one's preferences. There are also very noteworthy flaws in all three, that I hope are improved upon in the future.
I would say this forum and its predecessor were much worse at it then other forums, but I haven't read SF or Reddit it in a while, so that would be disingenuous. I do know a couple of posters, who don't post anymore due to the negativity here though.
Maybe I just don't search out fandoms a whole lot online, but the general idea that anyone has to "defend Fates" from the great wave of people who really love Echoes is strange to me.
I don't see a lot of super huge fans of Echoes, it's mainly just people going "ah, that game was refreshing". Fates has had plenty of fans and defenders and is, to my knowledge, the best selling FE game.
I'm sorry Lunar, that's what I read your post as (but seriously that topic has died on a while ago wonder why you brought it back up).
I would say this forum and its predecessor were much worse at it then other forums, but I haven't read SF or Reddit it in a while, so that would be disingenuous. I do know a couple of posters, who don't post anymore due to the negativity here though.
Dude, the negativity towards Fates is literally everywhere. In this very thread, on this very forum, on GAF, on Gamefaqs, on Reddit, twitter, etc. It's not necessarily the Echoes fans who are doing this either, but FE fans in general seem to take issue with everything Fates.
The general idea is that Fates is bad or was a huge disappointment in contrast to Echoes which is considered very good or a return to form.
Obviously there are a growing amount of people who defend Fates (Conquest) and more and more people are calling out Echoes for its gameplay flaws, but yeah, it's a thing.
This ignores the rather sizable contingent of "I was (re)introduced to the series through Awakening (and liked it) but found Fates disappointing" fans though.Dude, the negativity towards Fates is literally everywhere. In this very thread, on this very forum, on GAF, on Gamefaqs, on Reddit, twitter, etc. It's not necessarily the Echoes fans who are doing this either, but FE fans in general seem to take issue with everything Fates.
The general idea is that Fates is bad or was a huge disappointment in contrast to Echoes which is considered very good or a return to form.
Obviously there are a growing amount of people who defend Fates (Conquest) and more and more people are calling out Echoes for its gameplay flaws, but yeah, it's a thing.
I loved the non generic medieval armor/setting for once though. Wished they could have backed it up with a better story and world building.
There was kind of a weird discussion going down in a Smash Bros thread of all places, so it was more an attempt to take the conversation that was happening there to here, along with some general confusion about strange bouts of animosity. I probably deserve some Jorts-based punishment for that, though.
Yeah, I know a lot of people dislike Fates, myself chief among them, but I just haven't seen a lot of rah-rah super fans of echoes that leverage echoes to say why Fates was so bad. I see it here and there, but even in this thread I feel like most people were lukewarm on the game at best. But Fates has an enormous fanbase and is pretty well loved, it's always weird to me that people who love the game a lot tend to lash out more than people who want to deride it, at least when it comes to Echoes. But this thread is pretty much my only exposure to any FE fandom, and aside from some weird arguments here and there, it's been largely civil and straightforward.
Fates definitely had the better first trailer. Coming out of nowhere probably helped that though, and the dialogue for Three Houses was kind of distracting.