There is something profoundly depressing about this. The revelation that something that was once thought of as an institution revealed to be vulnerable and impermanent. It's difficult not to draw a connection to our current times.
Firefighters aren't sure they can save the north bell tower. It might collapse eventually
Source: BFMTV
Firefighters aren't sure they can save the north bell tower. It might collapse eventually
Source: BFMTV
Glad to hear the artifacts and art were saved. The building can be replaced and will be, but those are priceless.
Yes. It'll take time though.
856 years old.
Built during the end of the late-Roman Empire.
Before North and South America were known to even exist.
When flat-earthers ruled the world and the sun revolved around the Earth.
Is the whole thing burning down or is it isolated to a section or 2?
Sucks this happened but at the end of the day it's just a building. Seems like this is nature's way of saying it's time for an update.
The Parthenon and the Pyramids and the Great Wall of China and Petra are all "just buildings". That's not the point, and not everything needs "updated".Sucks this happened but at the end of the day it's just a building. Seems like this is nature's way of saying it's time for an update.
We probably won't be able to see the completely rebuilt cathedral in our lifetime though.I'm curious. Are there any depictions of what the cathedral's state was like in the time preceding Victor Hugo's book when the cathedral was, by most accounts, dilapidated? It's certainly not the first time they've done a mass renovation of the cathedral, and by the standards of some of the posters in the thread the building might well be thought of as only a couple hundred years old, not pushing on a millenium.
(incidentally you'll never guess what caused the cathedral to be in such a pitiful state at the start of the 19th century /s)
Yeah they can. It's not the whole of Notre Dame that is destroyed as the stonework won't catch fire. The frame has been the primary concern since that could spread further into the interior where there are (was) flammable artwork.
Yes. Like every building ever created by man.It's not just a building. It's a part of the cultural and emotional heart of France. Human lives have passed through that place for 856 years.
idiot.
It will take decades. Rebuilding the Dresden Frauenkirche took over ten years:
It's kinda crazy to think it's so old. We usually think of "Romans/Greek/Celts/Germanic Tribes" when we start mentioning "milleniums" in Europe.I'm curious. Are there any depictions of what the cathedral's state was like in the time preceding Victor Hugo's book when the cathedral was, by most accounts, dilapidated? It's certainly not the first time they've done a mass renovation of the cathedral, and by the standards of some of the posters in the thread the building might well be thought of as only a couple hundred years old, not pushing on a millenium.
(incidentally you'll never guess what caused the cathedral to be in such a pitiful state at the start of the 19th century /s)
It wasn't nature, it was likely a construction accident/oversight.Sucks this happened but at the end of the day it's just a building. Seems like this is nature's way of saying it's time for an update.
That's shocking to me since I can't see a single flame coming from it. Must be really bad inside it then.
A lot of it was apparently off site or in the vault due to cleaning/repairs/restoration.Oh my God, this is so saddening.
I don't want to be pessimistic, but how is that even possible? Much of the art in churches is actually built into the structure. There is no way they could've have brought all that to safety. They literally would have to break things out of the walls or cut painting out of altars. Well, maybe that's what they did, but I doubt they had the time to do that to the hundreds of pieces of art in the entire church.
That's crazy. A lot of work must go into restoring it to its original lookIt will take decades. Rebuilding the Dresden Frauenkirche took over ten years:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dresden_Frauenkirche
I don't want to be pessimistic, but how is that even possible? Much of the art in churches is actually built into the structure. There is no way they could've have brought all that to safety. They literally would have to break things out of the walls or cut painting out of altars. Well, maybe that's what they did, but I doubt they had the time to do that to the hundreds of pieces of art in the entire church.
I think they've been gradually moving people back over the evening so hopefully most people are out of the way. Firefighters are most at risk. Saw a shot of licks of flame in what I assume is the north tower, I really hope it doesn't engulf it.Damn. If the firefighters are warning like that about the north tower, then it must be really bad inside.
I hope they start evacuating anyone from the perimeter of the cathedral, as a precaution in face of an eventual collapse.
Yes but it will be a monumental (heh) effort and it won't be the same thing 100%
They will all be gone one day. Some just faster than others. That's human existence. Destruction is an inevitable consequence in a finite universe and a massive fire is just one of those signals to rebuild or make something different but maybe better.The Parthenon and the Pyramids and the Great Wall of China and Petra are all "just buildings". That's not the point, and not everything needs "updated".
If the fire burned long and hot enough, couldn't there be a risk of the mortar weakening?Yeah they can. It's not the whole of Notre Dame that is destroyed as the stonework won't catch fire. The frame has been the primary concern since that could spread further into the interior where there are (was) flammable artwork.